Neophilologus

, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 123–144

The Opus Geminatum and Anglo-Saxon Literature

Article
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

This article traces the development of the opus geminatum (a twinned pair of texts, one in verse, one in prose, treating the same subject) as this grows out of late antique literary practices surrounding the conversio (paraphrase) and as it is adopted by Anglo-Saxon authors, becoming one of their most distinctive literary forms.

Keywords

Opus geminatum Anglo-Saxon Latin Bede Rhetoric Genre 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barquist, C. R. (1987). Phonological patterning in Beowulf. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 2, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett, C. (1966). The larger rhetorical patterns in Anglo-Saxon poetry. New York: AMS.Google Scholar
  3. Berendsohn, W. (1935). Zur Vorgeschichte des Beowulf. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  4. Brandt, S. (Ed.). (1890). Divinae Institutiones. CSEL 19. Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  5. Bredehoft, T. (2006). Early English metre (pp. 81–90). Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, H. E. (Ed. & Trans.). (1980). The Institutio Oratoria of Quntilian. Loeb Series 4. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Colgrave, B., & Mynors, R. (Eds. & Trans.). (1985). Two lives of Saint Cuthbert: A life by an anonymous monk of Lindisfarne and Bede’s prose life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Colgrave, B., & Mynors, R. (Eds. & Trans.). (1991). Historia ecclesiastica gentis anglorum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Corsaro, F. (Ed.). (1956). Tristicha and Carmen de Iesu Christi beneficiis. Catania: Edigraph.Google Scholar
  10. Creed, R. (1957). The Andswarode-System in Old English poetry. Speculum, 32, 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, M. (Ed.). (1966). Carmina. CCSL 126. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  13. Curtius, E. (1990). European literature and the Latin Middle-Ages (W. Trask, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Daur, K. D., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (1958). Augustine, De doctrina Christiana. CCSL 32. Turnholt: Brepols.Google Scholar
  15. Doane, A. N. (1991). Influence and intertextuality in literary history. In J. Clayton & E. Rothstein (Eds.), Oral texts, intertexts, and intratexts: Editing Old English (pp. 75–117). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dümmler, E. (Ed.). (1881). De vita sancti Willibrordi episcope. MGH Antiquitates PL 1 (pp. 207–227). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
  17. Ehwald, R. (Ed.). (1891). Aldhelmi Opera. MGH AA 15. Berlin: Weidmann, prose 228–323; verse 350–471.Google Scholar
  18. Fredborg, K. M. (2000). Ciceronean rhetoric and the schools. In J. Van Engen (Ed.), Learning institutionalized: Teaching in the Medieval University 9. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  19. Friedrich, L. (Ed.). (1881). Opere poetica. MGH AA 4(1). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
  20. Godman, P. (1981). The Anglo-Latin Opus Geminatum: From Aldhelm to Alcuin. Medium Ævum, 50(2), 215–229.Google Scholar
  21. Godman, P. (Ed. & Trans.). (1982). The Bishops, Kings and Saints of York. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Green, R. P. (1995). Proba’s Cento: Its date, purpose and reception. Classical Quarterly, 45, 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagendahl, H. (1958). Latin fathers and the classics: A study on the Apologists, Jerome and other Christian Writers. Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 6, Göteborg: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  24. Harbus, A. (2007). Anglo-Saxon mentalities and Old English literary studies. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 55, 13–22.Google Scholar
  25. Hartel, W. V. (Ed.). (1894). Sancti Pontii Meropii Paulini Nolani Carmina. CSEL 30(2). Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  26. Hilberg, I (Ed.). (1918). Epistulae, Pars IIII. CSEL 54. Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  27. Hovingh, P. (Ed.). (1960). Alethia. CCSL 128. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  28. Huemer, J. (Ed.). (1885). Sedulii opera omnia. CSEL 10. Vienna: Gerould.Google Scholar
  29. Huemer, J. (Ed.). (1891). Evangeliorum Libri Quattuor. CSEL 24. Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  30. Jaager, W. (Ed.). (1935). Bedas Metrische Vita Sancti Cuthberti. Leipzig: Mayer & Müller.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, S. (2005). As I once did with Grendel: Boasting and nostalgia in ‘Beowulf’. Modern Philology, 103(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamont, B. (2005). First impressions. Edinburgh: Penbury.Google Scholar
  33. Lapidge, M., & Herren, M. (Trans.). (1979). Aldhelm: The prose works. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
  34. Lapidge, M. (1993). Bede as poet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lapidge, M. (2003). The earliest manuscript of Bede’s metrical Vita S. Cudbercti. Anglo-Saxon England, 32, 43–54.Google Scholar
  36. Lapidge, M. (2006). The Anglo-Saxon library. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Leclercq, J. (1963). L’amour des lettres et le désir de Dieu: Initiation aux auteurs monastiques du Moyen age (2nd ed.). Paris: Le Cerf.Google Scholar
  38. Levison, W. (Ed.). (1919). Vita Willibrordi archiepiscopi Traiectensis auctore Alcuino. MGH SRM 7 (pp. 81–141). Hanover: Weidmann.Google Scholar
  39. Manitius, M. (1881). Geschichte der christlich-lateinischen Poesie bis zur Mitte des 8. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  40. McKeon, R. (Ed.). (1941). Aristotle, the basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. McKinlay, A. (Ed.). (1951). De actibus apostolorum. CSEL 72. Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  42. Migne, J (Ed.). (1846). Epigrammata: Prosperi Aquitani opera. PL 51. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
  43. Migne, J. (Ed.). (1861). Beati S. Felicis Confessoris Vita. PL 94. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
  44. Niles, J. D. (1981). Compound diction and style of Beowulf. English Studies, 62, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Brien O’Keeffe, K. (1997). Diction, variation and the formula. In R. E. Bjork & J. D. Niles (Eds.), A Beowulf handbook (pp. 85–104). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  46. Orchard, A. (1994). The poetic art of Aldhelm. Cambridge studies in Anglo-Saxon England 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Peiper, R. (Ed.). (1883). Poemata. MGH AA 6(2) (pp. 203–94). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
  48. Petschenig, M. (Ed.). (1888). Carmina. CSEL 16. Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  49. Poncelet, A. (1903). La vie de saint Willibrord par le prêtre Egbert. Analecta Bollandiana, 22, 419–422.Google Scholar
  50. Roberts, M. (1985). Biblical epic and rhetorical paraphrase in late antiquity. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
  51. Robinson, F. C. (1973). Syntactical glosses in Latin manuscripts of Anglo-Saxon England. Speculum, 48, 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinson, F. C. (1985). Beowulf and the appositive style. Knoxville: Tennessee University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ruff, C. (2005). The place of metrics in Anglo-Saxon Latin education: Aldhelm and Bede. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 104(2), 149–170.Google Scholar
  54. Schenkl, K. (Ed.).(1887). Carmen sacrum. CSEL 16. Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
  55. Scragg, D. G. (1991). The nature of Old English verse. In M. Godden & M. Lapidge (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Old English literature (pp. 54–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Spengel, L. (Ed.). (1856). Rhetores Graeci (Vol. 3). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  57. Springer, C. (1988). The gospel as epic in late antiquity: The Paschale Carmen of Sedulius. New York: Brill.Google Scholar
  58. Stanley, E. G. (2006). Aesthetic evaluations of the sound of Old English: ‘About the Anglo-Saxon tongue there was the strength of iron, with the sparkling and beauty of burnished steel. Leeds Studies in English, 37, 451–472.Google Scholar
  59. Townsend, D. (1993). Alcuin’s Willibrord, Wilhelm Levison, and the MGH. In R. Frank (Ed.), The politics of editing medieval texts (pp. 109–130). New York: AMS.Google Scholar
  60. Vollmer, F. (Ed.). (1905). Carmina. MGH, AA 14. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
  61. White, C. (2000). Early Christian Latin poets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. White, H. (2003). Anomalies of genre: The utility of theory and history for the study of literary genres. New Literary History, 34(3), 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wieland, G. (1981). Geminus Stilus: Studies in Anglo-Latin Hagiography. In M. Herren (Ed.), Insular Latin studies: Papers on Latin texts and manuscripts of the British Isles, 5501066 (pp. 113–133). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
  64. Wilkins, A. (Ed.). (1892). Cicero, De oratore. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  65. Williams, J. (2007). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (9th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  66. Winterbottom, M. (Ed.). (1970). Institutio oratoria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Woll, D. (1988). übersetzungstheorie bei Cicero. In A. Jörn (Ed.), Energeia und Ergon: sprachliche Variation–Sprachgeschichte–Sprachtypologie: Studia in honorem Eugenio Coseriu 3. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
  68. Wood, I. (2001). The missionary life: Saints and the evangelization of Europe 400–1050. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  69. Wright, N. (1995). History and literature in late antiquity and the Early Medieval West: Studies in intertextuality. Aldershot: Variorum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tyndale University CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations