Neophilologus

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 569–584 | Cite as

The Function of the Medieval in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Nouvelle Héloïse: A Rereading of the Abélard and Héloïse Motif

Open Access
Article
  • 552 Downloads

Abstract

Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s critical rewriting in his Nouvelle Héloïse of two foundational medieval works—the letters of Abélard and Héloïse, and Petrarch’s Canzoniere—reveals the crucial role that the medieval played in his own moral vision. This article both identifies a possible eighteenth-century source for Rousseau’s retelling of the Abélard and Héloïse story, and explores the function played by the medieval in his novel. The medieval in La Nouvelle Héloïse, as in his larger thought, was not a chronological, but an ethical category. It spoke not of historical events, but of his own “pays des chimères”. Because of its position outside of the accepted classical canons, it could incarnate an alternative vision commensurate with Rousseau’s own self-image as an outsider to the morally corrupted societies of his own time. Associated with the purer language of music, the medieval finally offered access to a higher spiritual plane, exemplified by Julie’s role as a Mary-like or even Christ-like figure. As such, the medieval ultimately served as an epistemological counter-model, an imaginary point of origin within a larger history of human virtue.

Keywords

Rousseau Abélard and Héloïse Petrarch La Nouvelle Héloïse Medievalism 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Alembert, J. Le Rond d’, & Diderot, D. (1751–1765). Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers (Vol. 17). Paris: Briasson, David l’aîné, Le Breton, Durand.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. L. (1971). Abélard and Héloïse: Eighteenth-century motif. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 84, 7–51.Google Scholar
  3. Bayle, P. (1740). Heloïse. In P. Brunel, P. Humbert et al. (Eds.), Dictionnaire historique et critique (Vol. 2, pp. 712–717). Amsterdam, Leiden: The Hague, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Challandes, L. (2002). D’Abélard à Julie: un héritage renversé. Annales Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 44, 55–80.Google Scholar
  5. Charrier, C. (1933). Héloïse dans l’histoire et dans la légende. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
  6. Duperray, E. (1997). L’or des mots. Une lecture de Pétrarque et du mythe littéraire de Vaucluse des origines à l’orée du XXe siècle. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  7. Feilla, C. (2004). From “sainted maid” to “wife in all her grandeur”: Translations of Heloise, 1687–1817. Eighteenth-Century Life, 28(2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gervaise, F. A. (1720). La vie de Pierre Abeillard, abbé de S. Gildas de Ruis, Ordre de S. Benoist, et celle d’Heloïse son epouse, premiere abbesse du Paraclet. Paris: Jean Musier, François Barois.Google Scholar
  9. Gervaise, F. A. (1723). Les veritables lettres d’Abeillard et d’Heloise, tirées d’un ancien manuscrit Latin trouvé dans la Bibliotheque de François Amboise Conseiller d’Etat. Paris: Jean Musier.Google Scholar
  10. Hamman, C. (2006). La vie de Jean-Jacques Rousseau ou l’éternel retour du Tasse. Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France, 106, 4.Google Scholar
  11. Holsinger, B. (2005). The premodern condition: Medievalism and the making of theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kamuf, P. (1982). Fictions of feminine desire: Disclosures of Héloïse. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  13. Koschorke, A. (2000). Joseph, Abélard, Saint-Preux. In Die heilige Familie und ihre Folgen. Ein Versuch. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  14. L’Aminot, T. (2002). L’amour courtois dans La Nouvelle Héloïse. In C. Piau-Gillot, R. Desné, & T. L’Aminot (Eds.), Modernité et pérennité de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean-Louis Lecercle (pp. 241–257). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
  15. Leborgne, E. (2002). De Saintré à Saint-Preux: culte amoureux et vassalité dans la première partie de La Nouvelle Héloïse. Annales Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 44, 81–99.Google Scholar
  16. McDonald Vance, C. (1973). The extravagant shepherd. A study of the pastoral vision in Rousseau’s Nouvelle Héloïse. Banbury: The Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Montoya, A. C. (2010a). Naturalizing the commonplace. Two readings of Tasso during the long eighteenth century (Sévigné, Rousseau). In J. Koopmans & N. H. Petersen (Eds.), Legitimation of Authority. Leuven: Peeters (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  18. Montoya, A. C. (2010b). Medievalism and enlightenment, 1647–1750 (Jean Chapelain to Jean-Jacques Rousseau). The Romanic Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  19. Petrarca, F. (1992). R. Antonelli, G. Contini, & D. Ponchiroli (Eds.), Canzoniere. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  20. Powell, M. (2000). Listening to Heloise at the Paraclete: Of scholarly diversion and a woman’s “conversion”. In B. Wheeler (Ed.), Listening to Heloise: The voice of a twelfth-century woman (pp. 255–286). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  21. Riley, P. (2004). Character and conversion in autobiography: Augustine, Montaigne, Descartes, Rousseau, and Sartre. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rousseau, J. J. (1973). B. Gagnebin & M. Raymond (Eds.), Confessions. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  23. Rousseau, J. J. (1993). H. Coulet (Ed.), La Nouvelle Héloïse. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  24. Rousseau, J. J. (1995). Dictionnaire de musique. In B. Gagnebin & M. Raymond (Eds.), Œuvres complètes (Vol. 5). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  25. Spaas, L. (1999). Rousseau et Abélard: la structure patriarcale menacée. In T. L’Aminot (Ed.), Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la lecture (pp. 107–116). Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Stackelberg, J. (2001). Du paysage de l’amour au paysage de l’âme: Pétrarque et Rousseau. In P. Aron, S. Basch et al. (Eds.), Vérité et littérature au XVIIIe siècle. Mélanges rassemblés en l’honneur de Raymond Trousson (pp. 265–270). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
  27. Starobinski, J. (1971). Jean-Jacques Rousseau. La transparence et l’obstacle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  28. Starobinski, J. (1994). Rousseau e Tasso: lezione sapegna 1993. Turin: B. Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  29. Stewart, P. (1995). Half-Title, or Julie Beheaded. The Romanic Review, 86, 36–43.Google Scholar
  30. Walter, E. (1980). Le complexe d’Abélard ou le célibat des gens de lettres. Dix-huitième siècle, 12, 127–152.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Romance Languages and Cultures, Faculty of ArtsUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations