Neophilologus

, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp 177–193

In Search of Vitality. Herman Bang’s Hopeless Generations in the Context of Contemporary Bio-political Movements

  • Louise Ebbesen Nielsen
  • Jens Lohfert Jørgensen
Article
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

This article draws attention to the paradigmatic shift in the use of the concept of ‘life’, which can be observed at the end of the nineteenth century. With Michel Foucault’s notion of bio-power as a foil, the article aims firstly to discuss how influential aesthetic, biological and political concepts such as vitalism (Hans Driesch) and degeneration (Max Nordau) can be conceived as different reactions to Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of the Species in the light of bio-power. Even though both Driesch and Nordau use Darwin’s theories to produce positive ideas about respectively the strong and healthy body and the strong and healthy society, it is important to note that they do not converge. Secondly, the article aims to discuss how a controversy between these concepts is given literary form in the Danish author Herman Bang’s novel Hopeless Generations (1880), perceived as one of the first ‘decadent’ works in Scandinavia. The reading demonstrates that Bang makes use of a rhetorical strategy of ambivalence in order to bring the concepts into productive play.

Keywords

Vitalism Decadence The Reception of Darwin Herman Bang Bio-politics ‘Hopeless Generations’ 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, P. T. (1992). Dekadense i nordisk litteratur 1880–1900. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
  2. Aschheim, S. A. (1993). Max Nordau, Friedrich Nietzsche and degeneration. Journal of Contemporary History 28. Google Scholar
  3. Bang, H. (1965). Haabløse Slægter. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  4. Behne, A., et al. (1988). DAS NEUE BERLIN. Grossstadtprobleme, Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Breidbach, O. (1998). Kurze Anleitung zum Bildgebrauch. In E. Haeckel (Ed.), Kunstformen der Natur. Munich: Prestel-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Buvik, P. (2001). Dekadense. Oslo: Pax Forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Dam, A. E. (2006). Den vitalistiske strømning i dansk litteratur omkring år 1900. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Aarhus: Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  8. Darwin, F. (Ed.). (1887). The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C. (2006). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, INC.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, vol. 59.Google Scholar
  11. Driesch, H. (1922). Geschichte des Vitalismus. Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
  12. Driesch, H. (1979a). The science and philosophy of the organism, Vol. I. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
  13. Driesch, H. (1979b). The science and philosophy of organism, Vol. II. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, H. (1932). Views and reviews. A selection of uncollected articles 1884–1932. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1998). The will to knowledge. The history of sexuality. Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Jünger, E. (1980). Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis in Sämtliche Werke VII. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  17. Lazzarato, M. (2006). From biopower to biopolitics. Tailoring Biotechnologies 2(2).Google Scholar
  18. Ledger, S., & Luckhurst, R. (Eds.) (2000). The Fin de Siècle. A reader in cultural history, c. 1880–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nietzsche, F. (1911). The case of Wagner. Edinburgh/London: T.N. Foulis. http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/2/5/0/1/25012/25012-h/25012-h.html (visited 06.08. 2009).
  20. Nordau, M. (1993). Degeneration. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ridge, G. R. (1961). The hero in French decadent literature. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sendlinger, A. (1994). Lebenspathos und Decadence um 1900. Studien zur Dialektik der décadence und der Lebensphilosophie am Beispiel Eduard von Kaiserlings und Georg Simmels. Frank-furt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Simmel, G. (1921). Der Konflikt der modernen Kultur. Munich/Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  24. Sonntag, M. (1989). ‘Lebenskraft’. Die Biologie vor 1859. In J. Clair et al. (Eds.) WUNDERBLOCK. Eine Geschichte der modernen Seele. Vienna: Löcker Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Sørensen, V. (1972). Indledning til Haabløse Slægter. In Winge (Ed.).Google Scholar
  26. Winge, M. (Ed.). (1972). Omkring Haabløse Slægter. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel Forlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Ebbesen Nielsen
    • 1
  • Jens Lohfert Jørgensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Language, Literature and Culture/GermanUniversity of AarhusÅrhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Aesthetic Studies/Comparative LiteratureUniversity of AarhusÅrhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations