Neophilologus

, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp 353–362 | Cite as

Cain’s Marke: N-Town’s Noah and the Lamech Interlude Reconsidered

Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The placement of Cain’s death into the middle of the N-Town Noah pageant has long intrigued readers of this English mystery cycle. Scholars have often focused on the role played by Cain’s murderer Lamech, though, instead of the slain villain himself, and these researchers have used the figure of Lamech to argue for the scene’s significance. This essay contends that we should once again place Cain at the center of the play’s meaning by exploring his role in several of the N-Town pageants. Following Martin Stevens’s theories about the cycle, this paper claims that Cain’s various appearances help to construct a commentary on repentance that is essential for developing a holistic reading of the N-Town cycle.

Keywords

Cain Lamech Martin Stevens N-Town cycle Noah pageant 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augustine (trans., 1948). The City of God. In Whitney J. Oates (Ed.), Basic Writings of Saint Augustine (Vol. 2). M. Dods, G. Wilson, & J.J. Smith (Trans.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose. (1844-55 edition). De Cain et Abel. In J.P. Migne (Ed.), Patrologia Cursus Completus, Series Latina (Vol. 14). Paris. http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/18151875,Migne,_Patrologia_Latina_01.
  3. Beadle, R. (Ed.). (1982). The York plays. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  4. Cawley, A.C. & Stevens M. (Eds.). (1994). The Towneley Plays (Vols. 1–2) EETS s.s. 13 and 14. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, R. T. (Ed.). (1972). The Corpus Christi play of the english middle ages. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Guilfoyle, C. M. (1987). Cain, Lamech, and the “Quarell Hede”. English Language Notes, 25(2), 13–18.Google Scholar
  7. Kelly, E. M. (1972). “Ludus Coventriae” Play 4 and the Egerton “Genesis”. Notes and Queries, 19, 443–444.Google Scholar
  8. Lumiansky, R. M. & Mills, D. (Eds.). (1974). The Chester mystery cycle (Vols. 1–2). EETS s.s. 3 and 9. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  9. Melinkoff, R. (1981). The Mark of Cain. Berkeley: U of California P.Google Scholar
  10. Meredith, P. (1997). The Mary play. Exeter: U of Exeter P.Google Scholar
  11. Meredith, P. & Kahrl, S.J. (Eds.). (1977). The N-Town Plays: A Facsimile of British Library MS Cotton Vespasian D VIII. Medieval Drama Facsimiles IV. Leeds: U of Leeds.Google Scholar
  12. Nitecki, A. K. (1979). The N-Town Lamech and the Convention of Maximainus’ [sic] First Elegy. American Notes and Queries, 17, 122–123.Google Scholar
  13. Poteet, D. P. II. (1975). Symbolic character and form in the Ludus Coventriae “Play of Noah”. American Benedictine Review, 26, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reiss, E. (1975). The Story of Lamech and its Place in Medieval Drama. The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2, 35–48.Google Scholar
  15. Schell, E. (1991). The Limits of Typology and the Towneley Master’s Processus Noe. Comparative Drama, 25, 168–189.Google Scholar
  16. Spector, S. (Ed.). (1991). The N-Town Play: Cotton MS Vespasian D.8 (Vols. 1–2). EETS s.s. 11 and 12. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  17. Stevens, M. (1987). Four middle english mystery cycles: Textual, contextual, and critical interpretations. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
  18. Sugano, D. (1994). “This game wel pleyd in good a-ray”: The N-Town Playbooks and East Anglian Games. Comparative Drama, 28, 221–234.Google Scholar
  19. Weber, R., et al. (Eds.). (1994). Biblia Sacra iuxta vulgatam versionem (editionem quartem). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  20. Woolf, R. (1972). The English mystery plays. Berkeley: U of California P.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishColumbus State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations