, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 509–522

Burh and Beam, Burning Bright: A Study in the Poetic Imagination of the Old English Exodus



The Old English Exodus, a vigorous poetic retelling of the most exciting parts of the eponymous book, stands out from its immediate context, Junius 11, a manuscript of Biblical verse, and, indeed, from the rest of the Anglo-Saxon literature. One of the distinct features of its poetics is its self-conscious handling of two unexpected evocative objects to explore the larger themes of connection and disruption, tradition and innovation. The first, surprising for a poem taking place in and around the desert and the sea, is the burh, “city, fortification, enclosure,” that emerges, on a horizontal axis, in various permutations throughout the epic voyage of the Israelites, and shows continuity within discontinuity. The second crucial artifact, the shape-shifting pillar separates Moses’ troop from their surroundings while connecting them vertically to the biblical past and the Christian and eschatological future. Through my investigation of these two evocative objects I hope not only to illuminate a new aspect of an Old English poetics, but also to make an early-medievalist contribution to recent discussions of fusions between the human and the artifactual in “thing theory.”


The Old English Exodus Poetics Evocative objects Thing theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astill, G. (2006). Community, identity, and the later anglo-saxon town: The case of Southern England. In W. Davies, D. Halsall, & A. Reynolds (Eds.), People and space in the middle ages 300–1300 (pp. 233–254). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. (1988). Air and dreams: An essay on the imagination of movement (E. R. Farrell & C. F. Farrell, Trans.). Dallas: The Dallas Institute of Humanities & Culture.Google Scholar
  3. Biggam, C. P. (1998). Grey in Old English: An interdisciplinary semantic study. London: Runetree Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bright, J. W. (1912). The relation of the Cædmonian exodus to the liturgy. Modern Language Notes, 27, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, B. (1994). The pattern of Old English burh in early Lindsey. Anglo-Saxon England, 23, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csikoszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Curtius, E. R. (1953). European literature and the Latin middle ages (W. R. Trask, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Festa, L. (2009). A skin, a shoe, a pair of somethings (Description, Detail, Defoe). Unpublished paper presented at Yale.Google Scholar
  9. Frank, R. (1988). What kind of poetry is Exodus? In D. G. Calder & T. C. Christy (Eds.), Germania: Comparative studies in the Old Germanic languages and literatures (pp. 191–205). Wolfeboro: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  10. Green, B. (1981). The mode and meaning of the Old English “Exodus”. English Studies in Africa, 24, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, J. R. C. (1960). A concise anglo-saxon dictionary: Fourth edition with a supplement by Herbert D. Merritt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, T. N. (1991). The cross as green tree in the Vindicta Salvatoris and the green rod of Moses in Exodus. English Studies, 24, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helder, W. (1975). Etham and the Ethiopians in the Old English Exodus. Annuale Mediaevale, 16, 5–24.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, T. D. (1980). The virga of Moses and the Old English Exodus. In J. D. Niles (Ed.), Old English literature in context: Ten essays (pp. 57–65). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  15. Hume, K. (1974). The concept of the hall. Anglo-Saxon England, 3, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irving, E. B., Jr. (1953). The Old English exodus. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Krapp, G. P. (1931). The junius manuscript: Anglo-Saxon poetic records 1. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (2000). The Berlin key or how to do words with thing. In P. M. Graves-Brown (Ed.), Matter, materiality, and modern culture (pp. 10–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Lucas, P. J. (1976). Old English Christian poetry: The cross in Exodus. In Gerald Bonner (Ed.), Famulus Christi: Essays in commemoration of the thirteenth centenary of the birth of the venerable Bede (pp. 193–209). London: S.P.C.K.Google Scholar
  21. Lucas, P. J. (1994). Exodus (2nd ed.). Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, E. E. (1982). Allegory and the African woman in the Old English Exodus. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 81, 1–15.Google Scholar
  23. Portnoy, P. (2001). Ring composition and the digressions of Exodus: The “legacy” of the “remnant”. English Studies, 4, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, F. C. (1979). Two aspects of variation. In D. G. Calder (Ed.), Old English poetry: Essays on style (pp. 127–145). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sidebottom, P. (2000). Viking age stone monuments and social identity in Derbyshire. In D. M. Hadley & J. D. Richards (Eds.), Cultures in contact: Scandinavian settlement in England in the ninth and tenth centuries (pp. 213–235). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  26. Tolkien, J. R. R. (1934). Sigelwara land. Medium Ævum, 3(2), 95–111.Google Scholar
  27. Turkle, S. (2007). What makes an object evocative. In S. Turkle (Ed.), Evocative objects: Things we think with (pp. 307–326). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vickrey, J. F. (1973). “Exodus” and the tenth plague. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, 210, 41–52.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, J. H. (1974). Christian theology and Old English poetry. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.English DepartmentYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations