Neophilologus

, 94:33

Defective Memories, Deception, and the Writing Process: Montaigne’s Attempt at Truth in Essay I: 9

Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Montaigne expresses strong doubt in the Essais about intrusions of memory. For Montaigne scholars, essay I: 9, “Des Menteurs,” provides a particularly fascinating study, as the essayist ties the act of lying with that of remembering and proposes a solution to the problem of his own defective memory in the dialectical nature of the writing process. While deviating from the initial subject of his essay, “Of Liars,” Montaigne joins the Renaissance debate concerning natural vs. artificial memory, inviting us to consider the wisdom of his ancient predecessors Aristotle, Cicero and Quintilian. A consideration of the elaborate visual systems and mnemonic devices of his contemporaries Giulio Camillo and Giordano Bruno sheds yet another perspective on the value of memory in the search for truth. The historical anecdotes Montaigne chooses to include in essay I: 9 underscore the modernity of his writing, as they describe memory defects not unlike those identified by contemporary neuroscientists and cognitive psychologists. Finally, through his own writing process in essay I: 9, Montaigne displays a preference for the power of human judgment and the exercise of our intellects over that of our memories as a more certain way of getting at the truth.

Keywords

Montaigne Essais Memory Liars Menteurs 

References

  1. Ad C. Herennium de Ratione Dicendi (1954) (H. Caplan, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library Series, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, III, xvii, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1984). De Memoria in the complete works of Aristotle. (J. Barnes, Ed. Vol. I Series, 451b, 16–20; 453a, 5–13). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cicero. (1964). Pro. Q. Ligario in Cicero, The Speeche. (N. H. Watts, Trans. Vol. XII, pp. 35–36). Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. de Montaigne, M. (1962). Oeuvres complètes. (Ed. Albert Thibaudet et Maurice Rat), Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  5. de Montaigne, M. (1965). Les Essais. (V.-L. Saulnier, Ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  6. Friedrich, H. (1991). Montaigne. (P. Desan, Ed., Eng. Dawn, Trans.). (p. 338). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Holyoake, S. J. (1995). Montaigne’s attitude to memory. In D. Berven (Ed.), Montaigne: A collection of essays (Vol. 3, p. 111). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Book I, pp. 261–262Google Scholar
  9. Luthy, H. (1995). Montaigne, or the art of being truthful. In D. Berven (Ed.), Montaigne: A collection of essays (Vol. 1, p. 34). New York: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Ong, W. J. (1958). Ramus: Method and decay of dialogue (pp. 171–195). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Quintilian. (1958). Institutio Oratoria. (H. E. Butler, Trans. Vol. 4. XI. ii. pp. 1–3; 49–50). Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rose, S. (1992). The making of memory. From molecules to mind (p. 67). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, N. (2006). Collective Memory before and after Halbwachs. In The French Review, Vol. 79. n. 4.Google Scholar
  14. Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers (p. 4). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  15. Yates, F. (1966). The art of memory (pp. 42–92; 135–163). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages, Literatures and CulturesGallaudet UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations