Advertisement

Neophilologus

, 91:487 | Cite as

“The Partridge” is a phoenix: revising the Exeter Book Physiologus

  • Michael D. C. DroutEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The poem about a bird on folios 97v to 98r of the Exeter Book that has been traditionally called “The Partridge” is unlikely to be about that particular bird and more likely to be about the phoenix. The case for the phoenix is supported by the structure of the Anglo-Saxon Physiologus as a whole, with the “The Panther” representing Christ, or Christ’s death, “The Whale,” the devil or the descent into hell, and the bird poem, Christ’s or man’s resurrection. The appearance of a marvelous odor in the other two Physiologus poems suggests that such an odor would have appeared in the third, also supporting the phoenix as the identity of the bird. If the lines on 97v and 98r are indeed part of the same poem, the presence of the words hweorfan and cyrran in the homiletic passage also supports the link with the phoenix. The use of animal exempla for didactic purposes also links the Physiologus poems to other poems in the Exeter Book (such as the riddles) and to the cultural concerns of the 10th-century Benedictine Reform.

Keywords

Anglo-Saxon Physiologus Exeter Book Partridge Charadrius Benedictine reform Phoenix 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank John Miles Foley, Martin Camargo, Allen J. Frantzen, Patrick Conner, Beatrice Lafarge and most of all Mercedes Salvador for assistance and encouragement.

References

  1. Baxter, R. (1998). Bestiaries and their users in the middle ages. Phoenix Mill: Sutton.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, F. M. (1989). The eschatological conclusion of the old English Physiologus. Medium Aevum, 58, 286–297.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, A., & Frantzen, A. J. (1976). The integrity of Resignation. Review of English Studies, New Series 27, 385–402.Google Scholar
  4. Bosworth, J. (Ed.). (1882). Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, T. (1978). Thematic unity in the old English Physiologus. Archive fur das Studium der neueren Sprachen and Literaturen, 215, 73–79.Google Scholar
  6. Carmody, F. J. (Ed.). (1933–1934). Physiologus Latinus Versio Y. University of California Publications in Classical Philology, 12, 95–134.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, W. B. (Ed. and Trans.) (1992). The medieval book of birds: Hugh of Fouilloy’s Aviarium. Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, W. B., & McMunn, M. T. (Eds.). (1989). Beasts and birds of the middle ages: The bestiary and its legacy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  9. Conner, P. (1986). The structure of the Exeter book codex (Exeter, Cathedral Library, MS. 3501). Scriptorium, 40, 233–242.Google Scholar
  10. Conner, P. (1993). Anglo-Saxon Exeter: A tenth-century cultural history. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, A. S. (Ed.). (1921). The old English Physiologus. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cordasco, F. (1949). The old English Physiologus: Its problems. Modern Language Quarterly, 10, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drout, M. D. C. (2006). How tradition works: A Meme-Based cultural poetics of the Anglo-Saxon tenth century. Tempe: Arizona Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Ebert, K. W. A. (1883). Der angelsachsische Physiologus. Anglia, 6, 241–247.Google Scholar
  15. Fitzpatrick, M. C. (1933). Lactanti de ave Phoenice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  16. Greenfield, S. (1986). A new critical history of old English literature. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hoek, M. C. (1997). Anglo-Saxon innovation and the uses of the senses in the old English Physiologus poems. Studia Neophilologica, 69, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klaeber, Fr. (Ed.). (1950). Beowulf and the fight at Finnsburg (3rd ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  19. Krapp, G. P. (Ed.). (1936). The Junius manuscript vol. I. The Anglo-Saxon poetic records. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Krapp, G. P., & van Kirk Dobbie, E. (Eds.) (1936). The Exeter book, vol. III, The Anglo-Saxon poetic records. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lapidge, M. (1985). Surviving booklists from Anglo-Saxon England. In M. Lapidge & H. Gneuss (Eds.), Learning and literature in Anglo-Saxon England: Studies presented to Peter Clemoes on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (pp. 33–90). Cambridge: Cambridge, UP.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, C. S. 1992 (1961). An experiment in criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Letson, D. R. (1979). The old English Physiologus and the homiletic tradition. Florilegium, 1, 15–41.Google Scholar
  24. Mann, M. F. (1900). Review of Eduard Sokoll “Zum angelsachsischen Physiologus. Beiblatt zur Anglia, 11, 332–336.Google Scholar
  25. Marchand, J. W. (1991). The partridge? An old English Multiquote. Neophilologus, 75, 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, R. (1967[1874]). The Blickling Homilies. Oxford: Early English Text society (o.s. 58)Google Scholar
  27. Napier, A. S. (Ed.) (1916). The old English version, with the Latin Original, of the Enlarged Rule of Chrodegang; An Old English Version, with the Latin Original, of the Capitula of Theodulf; An Interlinear Old English Rendering of the Epitome of Benedict of Aniane. Oxford: Early English Text society (o.s. 150).Google Scholar
  28. Peebles, R. J. (1910–1911). The Anglo-Saxon Physiologus. Modern Philology, 8, 571–579.Google Scholar
  29. Rossi-Reder, A. (1999). Beasts and Baptism: A new perspective on the old English Physiologus. Neophilologus, 83(3), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross, B. (1983). The old English Physiologus. Explicator, 42(Fall), 4–6.Google Scholar
  31. Rowland, B. (1978). Birds with human souls: A guide to bird symbolism. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rowland, B. (1989). The art of memory and the Bestiary. In W. B. Clark & M. T. McMunn (Eds.), Beasts and birds of the middle ages (pp. 12–25). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  33. Salvador Bello, M. (1998). Direct and indirect clues: Exeter Riddle no. 74 reconsidered. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 99, 17–29.Google Scholar
  34. Salvador, M. (2004). The oyster and the crab: A Riddle Duo (nos. 77 and 78) in the Exeter book. Modern Philology, 101, 400–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sisam, K. (1953). The Exeter book. In K. Sisam (Ed.), Studies in the history of old English literature (pp. 97–108). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sokoll, E. (1896/1897). Zum angelsachsischen Physiologus (XXVII. Jahresbericht d. K. K. Staats-Oberrealschule in Marburg 1896/97 Verlag der K. K. Oberrealschule).Google Scholar
  37. Toller, T. N. (Ed.) (1966). An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Supplement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tupper, F. (1912). Notes on old English poems, II: The Physiologus of the Exeter book. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 11, 89–91.Google Scholar
  39. White, T. H. (1954). The book of beasts. London: W.S. Cowell.Google Scholar
  40. Wülker, R. (1885). Grundriss zur Geschichte der angelsächs. Litteratur. Leipzig: Von Veit.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wheaton CollegeNortonUSA

Personalised recommendations