Natural history, clinical course and predictors of interval time from initial diagnosis to development of subsequent NSCLC brain metastases
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. During recent years, accompanying dramatic improvements in systemic disease control, NSCLC brain metastases have emerged as an increasingly relevant clinical problem. However, optimal surveillance practices remain poorly defined. This purpose of this study was to further characterize the natural history, clinical course and risk factors associated with earlier development of subsequent NSCLC brain metastases to better inform clinical practice and help guide survivorship care.
We retrospectively reviewed all institutional NSCLC brain metastasis cases treated with radiotherapy between 1997 and 2015. Exclusion criteria included presence of brain metastases at initial NSCLC diagnosis and incomplete staging information. Interval time to brain metastases and subsequent survival were characterized using Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
Among 105 patients within this cohort, median interval time to development of brain metastases was 16 months. Median interval times were 29, 19, 16 and 13 months for Stage I–IV patients, respectively (P = 0.016). Additional independent predictors for earlier development of NSCLC brain metastases included non-adenocarcinomatous histopathology (HR 3.036, P < 0.001), no prior surgical resection (HR 1.609, P = 0.036) and no prior systemic therapy (HR 3.560, P = 0.004). Median survival following intracranial progression was 16 months. Delayed development of brain metastases was associated with better prognosis (HR 0.970, P < 0.001) but not survival following intracranial disease onset.
Collectively, our results provide valuable insights into the natural history of NSCLC brain metastases. NSCLC stage, histology, prior surgical resection and prior systemic therapy emerged as independent predictors for interval time to brain metastases.
KeywordsLung cancer NSCLC Brain metastases Neurooncology Radiation oncology
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Wang reports personal fees and non-financial support from AbbVie, non-financial support from Merck, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Doximity, personal fees and non-financial support from Novocure, personal fees and non-financial support from Elekta and personal fees from Wolters Kluwer, outside the submitted work.
- 1.Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE (2014) Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the metropolitan detroit cancer surveillance system. J Clin Oncol 22(14):2865–2872. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Wen PY, Loeffler JS (1999) Management of brain metastases. Oncol (willist Park 13(7):941–961Google Scholar
- 4.Ostrom QT, Wright CH, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2018) Brain metastases: epidemiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00002-5 Google Scholar
- 8.Gomez DR Jr, Lee GRB, et al (2016) Local consolidative therapy versus maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without progression after first-line systemic therapy: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 17(12):1672–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30532-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Chang EL, Wefel JS, Ph D, Ph D, Allen PK, Ph D (2007) A pilot study of neurocognitive function in patients with one to three brain metastases initially treated with stereotactic radiosurgery alone. Neurosurgery 60(2):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000249272.64439.B1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Cordes M, Scherwath A, Ahmad T et al (2014) Distress, anxiety and depression in patients with brain metastases before and after radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 14(731):1–11Google Scholar
- 34.Ding X, Dai H, Hui Z et al (2012) Risk factors of brain metastases in completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 7(119):1–10Google Scholar
- 35.Chang W, Wu Y, Su P, Yang S, Lin C (2018) The impact of EGFR mutations on the incidence and survival of stages I to III NSCLC patients with subsequent brain metastasis. PLoS ONE 13:1–16Google Scholar
- 44.Sperduto PW, Yang TJ, Beal K et al (2016) The effect of gene alterations and tyrosine kinase inhibition on survival and cause of death in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96(2):406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Sperduto PW, Yang TJ, Beal K et al (2017) Estimating survival in patients with lung cancer and brain metastases an update of the graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA). JAMA Oncol 55387:827–831. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar