Advertisement

Fertility treatment is associated with multiple meningiomas and younger age at diagnosis

  • Maryam N. Shahin
  • Stephen T. MagillEmail author
  • Cecilia L. Dalle Ore
  • Jennifer A. Viner
  • Pamela N. Peters
  • David A. Solomon
  • Michael W. McDermott
Clinical Study

Abstract

Purpose

Meningiomas are more common in females and 70–80% express the progesterone receptor, raising the possibility that high­dose exogenous estrogen/progesterone exposure, such as occurs during fertility treatments, may increase the risk of developing a meningioma. The goal of this study was to report the incidence of prior fertility treatment in a consecutive series of female meningioma patients.

Methods

A retrospective review (2015–2018) was performed of female patients with meningioma, and those with prior fertility treatment were compared to those without fertility treatment using standard statistical methods.

Results

Of 206 female patients with meningioma, 26 (12.6%) had a history of fertility treatments. Patients underwent various forms of assisted reproductive technology including: in vitro fertilization (50.0%), clomiphene with or without intrauterine insemination (34.6%), and unspecified (19.2%). Median follow up was 1.8 years. Tumors were WHO grade I (78.6%) or grade II (21.4%). Patients who underwent fertility treatments presented at significantly younger mean age compared to those who had not (51.8 vs. 57.3 years, p = 0.0135, 2­tailed T­test), and on multivariate analysis were more likely to have multiple meningiomas (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.4–18.1, p = 0.0154) and convexity/falx meningiomas (OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.7–11.5, p = 0.0021).

Conclusions

Patients in this cohort with a history of fertility treatment were more likely to present at a younger age and have multiple and convexity/falx meningiomas, emphasizing the importance of taking estrogen/progesterone exposure history when evaluating patients with meningioma. Future clinical studies at other centers in larger populations and laboratory investigations are needed to determine the role of fertility treatment in meningioma development.

Keywords

Fertility Fertility treatment Meningioma Estrogen Progesterone Risk factor 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the Linda Wolfe Meningioma Research Program Project and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (1F32CA213944-01) to S.T.M.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests related to this study.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board at the author’s institution (IRB#13-12587). After reviewing the study, the institutional review board deemed the study minimal risk and waived the need for informed consent by each subject.

References

  1. 1.
    Dolecek TA, Dressler EVM, Thakkar JP et al (2015) Epidemiology of meningiomas post-public law 107–206: the benign brain tumor cancer registries amendment act. Cancer 121:2400–2410.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB (2010) Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 99:307–314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML et al (2013) Exogenous hormone use, reproductive factors, and risk of intracranial meningioma in females. J Neurosurg 118:649–656.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.JNS12811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cahill D, Bashirelahi N, Solomon L et al (1984) Estrogen and progesterone receptors in meningiomas and gliomas. J Neurosurg 60:985–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horsfall DJ, Goldsmith KG, Ricciardelli C et al (1989) Steroid hormone and epidermal growth factor receptors in meningiomas. Aust N Z J Surg 59:881–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Commins DL, Atkinson RD, Burnett ME (2007) Review of meningioma histopathology. Neurosurg Focus 23:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC-07/10/E3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lusis EA, Scheithauer BW, Yachnis AT et al (2012) Meningiomas in pregnancy: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Neurosurgery 71:951–961.  https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826adf65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buttrick S, Shah AH, Komotar RJ, Ivan ME (2016) Management of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 27:239–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2015.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chakravarthy V, Kaplan B, Gospodarev V et al (2018) Houdini tumor: case report and literature review of pregnancy-associated meningioma. World Neurosurg 114:e1261–e1265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Korhonen K, Raitanen J, Isola J et al (2010) Exogenous sex hormone use and risk of meningioma: a population-based case–control study in Finland. Cancer Causes Control 21:2149–2156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9634-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motegi H, Kobayashi H, Terasaka S et al (2012) Hemorrhagic onset of rhabdoid meningioma after initiating treatment for infertility. Brain Tumor Pathol 29:240–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-012-0088-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patterson A, Elashaal A (2016) Case report fast-growing meningioma in a woman undergoing fertility treatments. Case Rep Neurol Med 2016:3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3287381 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frassanito P, de Bonis P, Mattogno PP et al (2012) Hormonal therapy for fertility and huge meningioma: a purely random association? Acta Neurol Belg 112:299–301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-012-0046-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ter Wengel PV, Martin E, Gooren L et al (2016) Meningiomas in three male-to-female transgender subjects using oestrogens/progestogens and review of the literature. Andrologia 48:1130–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chargari C, Védrine L, Bauduceau O et al (2008) Reapprasial of the role of endocrine therapy in meningioma management. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:931–941.  https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-08-0083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grunberg SM, Weiss MH, Spitz IM et al (1991) Treatment of unresectable meningiomas with the antiprogesterone agent mifepristone. J Neurosurg 74:861–866.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.6.0861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olson JJ, Beck DW, Schlechte J, Loh PM (1986) Hormonal manipulation of meningiomas in vitro. J Neurosurg 65:99–107.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.65.1.0099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE (2014) First births to older women continue to rise. NCHS Data Brief 152:1–8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller CC (2018) The U. S. fertility rate is down, yet more women are mothers. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    CDC/ASRT 2012 (2014) Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith DH, Picker RH, Sinosich M, Saunders DM (1980) Assessment of ovulation by ultrasound and estradiol levels during spontaneous and induced cycles. Fertil Steril 33:387–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44654-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suneeta M, Prerna G, Neena M, Neeta S (2014) Serum estradiol as a predictor of success of in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynecol India 64:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0470-7 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nardulli AM, Greene GL, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS (1988) Regulation of progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein levels in MCF-7 cells by estradiol: analysis of estrogen’s effect on progesterone receptor synthesis and degradation. Endocrinology 122:935–944.  https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-122-3-935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Committee TP, Society A, Medicine R (2008) Progesterone supplementation during the luteal phase and in early pregnancy in the treatment of infertility: an educational bulletin. Fertil Steril 89:789–792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beltsos A, Robinson A, Martin-Johnston MK et al (2008) Serum progesterone levels with endometrin compared to progesterone in oil and associated pregnancy outcomes in a large IVF center. Fertil Steril 90:S366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaspard UJ, Romus MA, Gillain D et al (1983) Plasma hormone levels in women receiving new oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol plus levonorgestrel or desogestrel. Contraception 27:577–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(83)90023-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mishell D, Thorneycroft I, Nakamura R et al (1972) Serum estradiol in women ingesting combination oral contraceptive steroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114:923–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reigstad MM, Storeng R, Myklebust TA et al (2017) Cancer risk in women treated with fertility drugs according to parity status—a registry-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26:953–962.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hsu DW, Efird JT, Hedley-Whyte ET (1997) Progesterone and estrogen receptors in meningiomas: prognostic considerations. J Neurosurg 86:113–120.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peyre M, Gaillard S, de Marcellus C et al (2018) Progestin-associated shift of meningioma mutational landscape. Ann Oncol 29:681–686.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Unger CA (2016) Hormone therapy for transgender patients. Transl Androl Urol 5:877–884.  https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.09.04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harland TA, Freeman JL, Davern M et al (2018) Progesterone-only contraception is associated with a shorter progression-free survival in premenopausal women with WHO Grade I meningioma. J Neurooncol 136:327–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2656-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Owens MA, Craig BM, Egan KM, Reed DR (2015) Birth desires and intentions of women diagnosed with a meningioma. J Neurosurg 122:1151–1156.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.JNS14522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parada CA, Osbun J, Kaur S et al (2018) Kinome and phosphoproteome of high-grade meningiomas reveal AKAP12 as a central regulator of aggressiveness and its possible role in progression. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19308-y Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Clark VE, Erson-Omay EZ, Serin A et al (2013) Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 339:1077–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1233009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PathologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations