Advertisement

Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 139, Issue 3, pp 643–649 | Cite as

Outcomes of an electronic social network intervention with neuro-oncology patient family caregivers

  • Maija Reblin
  • Dana Ketcher
  • Peter Forsyth
  • Eduardo Mendivil
  • Lauren Kane
  • Justin Pok
  • Miriah Meyer
  • Yelena P. Wu
  • Jim Agutter
Clinical Study

Abstract

Introduction

Informal family caregivers (FCG) are an integral and crucial human component in the cancer care continuum. However, research and interventions to help alleviate documented anxiety and burden on this group is lacking. To address the absence of effective interventions, we developed the electronic Support Network Assessment Program (eSNAP) which aims to automate the capture and visualization of social support, an important target for overall FCG support. This study seeks to describe the preliminary efficacy and outcomes of the eSNAP intervention.

Methods

Forty FCGs were enrolled into a longitudinal, two-group randomized design to compare the eSNAP intervention in caregivers of patients with primary brain tumors against controls who did not receive the intervention. Participants were followed for six weeks with questionnaires to assess demographics, caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, and social support. Questionnaires given at baseline (T1) and then 3-weeks (T2), and 6-weeks (T3) post baseline questionnaire.

Results

FCGs reported high caregiver burden and distress at baseline, with burden remaining stable over the course of the study. The intervention group was significantly less depressed, but anxiety remained stable across groups.

Conclusions

With the lessons learned and feedback obtained from FCGs, this study is the first step to developing an effective social support intervention to support FCGs and healthcare providers in improving cancer care.

Keywords

Social network Family caregivers Social support Intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this publication was supported by the American Cancer Society under Award Number ACS MRSG 13-234-01-PCSM (PI Reblin), the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R03CA201684-01 (PI Reblin) and K07CA196985 (PI Wu). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding institutions. The authors would like to thank the participants who made this research possible.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Rodakowski J et al (2012) Role of social support in predicting caregiver burden. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit 93(12):2229–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sherwood PR, Cwiklik M, Donovan HS (2016) Neuro-oncology family caregiving: review and directions for future research. CNS Oncol 5(1):41 – 8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schubart JR, Kinzie MB, Farace E (2008) Caring for the brain tumor patient: family caregiver burden and unmet needs. Neuro Oncol 10(1):61–72CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hricik A et al (2011) Changes in caregiver perceptions over time in response to providing care for a loved one with a primary malignant brain tumor. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(2):149 – 55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burns CM et al (2013) Uncovering an invisible network of direct caregivers at the end of life: a population study. Palliat Med 27(7):608–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robison J et al (2009) A broader view of family caregiving: effects of caregiving and caregiver conditions on depressive symptoms, health, work, and social isolation. J Gerontol Ser 64(6):788–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sherwood PR et al (2006) Predictors of distress in caregivers of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor. Res Nurs Health 29(2):105–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmer C et al (2008) When a family member has a malignant brain tumor: the caregiver perspective. J Neurosci Nurs 40(2):78–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keating N, Eales J (2017) Social consequences of family care of adults: a scoping review. Int J Care Caring 1(2):153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Applebaum AJ, Breitbart W (2012) Care for the cancer caregiver: a systematic review. Palliat Support Care 11(3):231–252CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baron RS et al (1990) Social support and immune function among spouses of cancer patients. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(2):344 – 52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newberry A et al (2012) Identifying family members who are likely to perceive benefits from providing care to a person with a primary malignant brain tumor. Oncol Nurs Forum 39(3):E226-32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nabors N, Seacat J, Rosenthal M (2002) Predictors of caregiver burden following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 16(12):1039–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Northouse LL et al (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rempel GR, Neufeld A, Kushner KE (2007) Interactive use of genograms and ecomaps in family caregiving research. J Family Nurs 13(4):403–419Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ray RA, Street AF (2005) Ecomapping: an innovative research tool for nurses. J Adv Nurs 50(5):545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boele FW et al (2017) Neuro-oncology family caregivers’ view on keeping track of care issues using eHealth systems: it’s a question of time. J Neuro-Oncol 134(1):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carr D et al (2001) Psychological adjustment to sudden and anticipated spousal loss among older widowed persons. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 56(4):S237–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flynn FJ, Lake VK (2008) If you need help, just ask: underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. J Personal Soc Psychol 95(1):128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zebrack B et al (2016) Institutional capacity to provide psychosocial oncology support services: a report from the Association of Oncology Social Work. Cancer 122(12):1937–1945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montgomery R et al (2002) Profiles of respite use. Home Health Care Serv Q 21(3–4):33–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cannuscio CC et al (2004) Employment status, social ties, and caregivers’ mental health. Soc Sci Med 58(7):1247–1256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reblin M et al (2017) Development of the Electronic Social Network Assessment Program Using the Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research Roadmap. JMIR Human Factors 4(3):e23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fekete J-D et al (2008) The value of information visualization. In: Kerren A et al, (eds) Information visualization: human-centered issues and perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reblin M et al (in press) Feasibility of implementing an electronic social support and resource visualization tool for caregivers in a neuro-oncology clinic. Suppor Care CancerGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J (1980) Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist 20(6):649–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bédard M et al (2001) The Zarit Burden Interview: A New Short Version and Screening Version. The Gerontologist 41(5):652–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Higginson IJ et al (2010) Short-form Zarit Caregiver Burden Interviews were valid in advanced conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 63(5):535–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gaugler JE et al (2010) Clinically significant changes in burden and depression among dementia caregivers following nursing home admission. BMC Med 8:85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grunfeld E et al (2004) Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J 170(12):1795–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schulz R, Beach SR (1999) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. JAMA 282(23):2215–2219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bjelland I et al (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52(2):69–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hinz A,. Psychotherapie (2009) et al Measurement of change with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): sensitivity and reliability of change. Psychosom Med Psychol 59(11):394–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reblin M et al (2017) Mediating burden and stress over time: caregivers of patients with primary brain tumor. Psychooncology 27(2):607–612Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Northouse LL et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psycho-oncology 22(3):555–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Northouse LL et al (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA: A Cancer J Clin 60(5): 317–339Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matcham F et al (2014) Self-help interventions for symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 34(2):141–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Beatty LJ et al (2010) A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a self-help workbook intervention on distress, coping and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust 193(5):S68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Allison PJ et al (2004) Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology 13(7):482–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McMillan SC et al (2006) Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer 106(1):214–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Whelan J et al (2014) Cochrane update: predicting sustainability of intervention effects in public health evidence: identifying key elements to provide guidance. J Public Health 36(2):347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Marteau TM et al (2011) Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? BMJ: Br Med J (Online) 342:d228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ownsworth T, Goadby E, Chambers SK (2015) Support after brain tumor means different things: family caregivers’ experiences of support and relationship changes. Front Oncol 5:33PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cornwell P et al (2012) Care and support needs of patients and carers early post-discharge following treatment for non-malignant brain tumour: establishing a new reality. Support Care Cancer 20(10):2595–2610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Halkett G et al (2017) Do carer’s levels of unmet needs change over time when caring for patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and how are these needs correlated with distress? Support Care Cancer 26(1):275–286Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Halkett G et al (2010) The information and support needs of patients diagnosed with High Grade Glioma. Patient Educ Couns 79(1):112–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Helgeson VS (2003) Social support and quality of life. Qual Life Res 12:25–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Applebaum AJ et al (2016) Existential distress among caregivers of patients with brain tumors: a review of the literature. Neuro-Oncol Pract 3(4):232–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Talley A et al (2010) The influence of breast cancer survivors’ perceived partner social support and need satisfaction on depressive symptoms: a longitudinal analysis. Psychol Health 25(4):433–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaUSA
  2. 2.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Hunstman Cancer InstituteSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations