Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 141, Issue 1, pp 139–149 | Cite as

Survival of glioma patients in relation to mobile phone use in Denmark, Finland and Sweden

  • Ann OlssonEmail author
  • Liacine Bouaoun
  • Anssi Auvinen
  • Maria Feychting
  • Christoffer Johansen
  • Tiit Mathiesen
  • Beatrice Melin
  • Anna Lahkola
  • Suvi Larjavaara
  • Anne-Sophie Villegier
  • Graham Byrnes
  • Isabelle Deltour
  • Joachim Schüz
Clinical Study



Gliomas are the most common cancer of the brain, with a poor prognosis in particular for glioblastoma. In 2014, a study suggested reduced survival in relation to latency of mobile phone use among glioblastoma patients. A joint epidemiological/experimental project to study effects of RF-EMF on tumor development and progression was established. The current analysis relates to the epidemiological part and addresses whether pre-diagnostic mobile phone use was associated with survival among glioma patients.


Glioma cases (n = 806) previously enrolled in a collaborative population-based case–control study in Denmark, Finland and Sweden were followed up for survival. Vital status, date of death, date of emigration, or date last known to be alive was obtained based on registry linkages with a unique personal ID in each country. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) stratified by country. Covariates investigated were sex, age, education, histology, treatment, anatomic location and marital status.


No indication of reduced survival among glioblastoma patients was observed for various measures of mobile phone use (ever regular use, time since start of regular use, cumulative call time overall or in the last 12 months) relative to no or non-regular use. All significant associations suggested better survival for mobile phone users. Results were similar for high-grade and low-grade gliomas.


We found no evidence of reduced survival among glioma patients in relation to previous mobile phone use.


Glioma Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields Survival Case–control studies Mobile phones 



This work was supported by the French National Research Program for Environmental and Occupational Health of ANSES (2014/2 RF/002) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. The INTERPHONE study was supported by the European Union Fifth Framework Program “Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources” (contract number QLK4-CT-1999-01563), and The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). The UICC received funds for this purpose from the Mobile Manufacturers’ Forum and GSM Association. The provision of funds to the INTERPHONE study investigators via the UICC was governed by agreements that guaranteed INTERPHONE’s complete scientific independence. Additional support was obtained for the Swedish part from the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Cancer Society, for the Danish part from the Danish Cancer Society, and the Finnish part from the Emil Aaltonen Foundation and Academy of Finland. The treatment data were collected separately with specific funding from Cancer Foundation Norrland and the cutting edge hospital grant for Umeå University hospital in Sweden.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Anssi Auvinen has received research funding for the COSMOS cohort study from the National Technology Agency (TEKES) including contributions from Nokia and mobile network operators Elisa and Sonera and from Mobile Manufacturers’ Forum through Pirkanmaa Hospital District as a firewall. Professor Auvinen holds a part-time employment at STUK Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and is member of ICNIRP expert group on Data Gaps. Maria Feychting is vice chairman of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, an independent body setting guidelines for non-ionizing radiation protection. She serves as advisor to a number of national and international public advisory and research steering groups concerning the potential health effects of exposure to non-ionizing radiation. Professor Feychting is co-investigator of the COSMOS cohort study, funded by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, AFA Insurance (, and VINNOVA (The Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems, VINNOVA received funds for this purpose from TeliaSonera, Ericsson AB, and Telenor. The provision of funds to the COSMOS study investigators via VINNOVA is governed by agreements that guarantees COSMOS’ complete scientific independence. Remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approvals for the original case-control studies were obtained in accordance with legislation in each country, and the ethical approval for the current study was obtained from the IARC Ethics Committee (Project 15-09).

Supplementary material

11060_2018_3019_MOESM1_ESM.docx (188 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 291 KB)


  1. 1.
    Ervik M, Lam F, Ferley J, Mery L, Soerjomataram I, Bray F (2016) Cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Today., Accessed 28 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG, Deltour I, Fisher JL, Langer CE, Pekmezci M, Schwartzbaum JA, Turner MC, Walsh KM, Wrensch MR, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2014) The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a “state of the science” review. Neuro Oncol 16:896–913. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ostrom QT, Cote DJ, Ascha M, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2018) Adult glioma incidence and survival by race or ethnicity in the United States from 2000 to 2014. JAMA Oncol. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodenberger ML, Jenkins RB (2012) Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet 205:613–621. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melin BS, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Wrensch MR, Johansen C, Il’yasova D, Kinnersley B, Ostrom QT, Labreche K, Chen Y, Armstrong G, Liu Y, Eckel-Passow JE, Decker PA, Labussiere M, Idbaih A, Hoang-Xuan K, Di Stefano AL, Mokhtari K, Delattre JY, Broderick P, Galan P, Gousias K, Schramm J, Schoemaker MJ, Fleming SJ, Herms S, Heilmann S, Nothen MM, Wichmann HE, Schreiber S, Swerdlow A, Lathrop M, Simon M, Sanson M, Andersson U, Rajaraman P, Chanock S, Linet M, Wang Z, Yeager M, Wiencke JK, Hansen H, McCoy L, Rice T, Kosel ML, Sicotte H, Amos CI, Bernstein JL, Davis F, Lachance D, Lau C, Merrell RT, Shildkraut J, Ali-Osman F, Sadetzki S, Scheurer M, Shete S, Lai RK, Claus EB, Olson SH, Jenkins RB, Houlston RS, Bondy ML (2017) Genome-wide association study of glioma subtypes identifies specific differences in genetic susceptibility to glioblastoma and non-glioblastoma tumors. Nat Genet 49:789–794. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linos E, Raine T, Alonso A, Michaud D (2007) Atopy and risk of brain tumors: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1544–1550. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCarthy BJ, Rankin KM, Aldape K, Bondy ML, Brannstrom T, Broholm H, Feychting M, Il’yasova D, Inskip PD, Johansen C, Melin BS, Ruder AM, Butler MA, Scheurer ME, Schuz J, Schwartzbaum JA, Wrensch MR, Davis FG (2011) Risk factors for oligodendroglial tumors: a pooled international study. Neuro Oncol 13:242–250. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bondy ML, Scheurer ME, Malmer B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davis FG, Il’yasova D, Kruchko C, McCarthy BJ, Rajaraman P, Schwartzbaum JA, Sadetzki S, Schlehofer B, Tihan T, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M, Buffler PA (2008) Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer 113:1953–1968. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frei P, Poulsen AH, Johansen C, Olsen JH, Steding-Jessen M, Schuz J (2011) Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study. BMJ 343:d6387. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benson VS, Pirie K, Schuz J, Reeves GK, Beral V, Green J (2013) Mobile phone use and risk of brain neoplasms and other cancers: prospective study. Int J Epidemiol 42:792–802. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feychting M, Schuz J (2017) 15—Electromagnetic fields. In: Thun M, Linet MS, Cerhan JR, Haiman CA, Schottenfeld D (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 4th edn. Oxford Scholarship Online, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    (2010) Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 39: 675–694
  13. 13.
    IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2011) Non-ionizing radiation, Part II: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, LyonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wrensch M, Rice T, Miike R, McMillan A, Lamborn KR, Aldape K, Prados MD (2006) Diagnostic, treatment, and demographic factors influencing survival in a population-based study of adult glioma patients in the San Francisco Bay Area. Neuro Oncol 8:12–26. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buckner JC (2003) Factors influencing survival in high-grade gliomas. Semin Oncol 30:10–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, Walsh KM, Decker PA, Sicotte H, Pekmezci M, Rice T, Kosel ML, Smirnov IV, Sarkar G, Caron AA, Kollmeyer TM, Praska CE, Chada AR, Halder C, Hansen HM, McCoy LS, Bracci PM, Marshall R, Zheng S, Reis GF, Pico AR, O’Neill BP, Buckner JC, Giannini C, Huse JT, Perry A, Tihan T, Berger MS, Chang SM, Prados MD, Wiemels J, Wiencke JK, Wrensch MR, Jenkins RB (2015) Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter mutations in tumors. N Engl J Med 372:2499–2508. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meng W, Jiang Y, Ma J (2017) Is the prognostic significance of O6-methylguanine- DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation equally important in glioblastomas of patients from different continents? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 9:411–425. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carlberg M, Hardell L (2014) Decreased survival of glioma patients with astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) associated with long-term use of mobile and cordless phones. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:10790–10805. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lahkola A, Auvinen A, Raitanen J, Schoemaker MJ, Christensen HC, Feychting M, Johansen C, Klaeboe L, Lonn S, Swerdlow AJ, Tynes T, Salminen T (2007) Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. Int J Cancer 120:1769–1775. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sjostrom S, Andersson U, Liu Y, Brannstrom T, Broholm H, Johansen C, Collatz-Laier H, Henriksson R, Bondy M, Melin B (2010) Genetic variations in EGF and EGFR and glioblastoma outcome. Neuro Oncol 12:815–821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, Heurgren M, Olausson PO (2011) External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 11:450. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sund R (2012) Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: a systematic review. Scand J Public Health 40:505–515. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cardis E, Richardson L, Deltour I, Armstrong B, Feychting M, Johansen C, Kilkenny M, McKinney P, Modan B, Sadetzki S, Schuz J, Swerdlow A, Vrijheid M, Auvinen A, Berg G, Blettner M, Bowman J, Brown J, Chetrit A, Christensen HC, Cook A, Hepworth S, Giles G, Hours M, Iavarone I, Jarus-Hakak A, Klaeboe L, Krewski D, Lagorio S, Lonn S, Mann S, McBride M, Muir K, Nadon L, Parent ME, Pearce N, Salminen T, Schoemaker M, Schlehofer B, Siemiatycki J, Taki M, Takebayashi T, Tynes T, van Tongeren M, Vecchia P, Wiart J, Woodward A, Yamaguchi N (2007) The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. Eur J Epidemiol 22:647–664. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ouadah NS, Lecomte A, Robidel F, Olsson A, Deltour I, Schüz J, Blazy K, Villégier A-N (2018) Possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on in vivo C6 brain tumors in Wistar rats. J Neuro-Oncol. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M (2013) Use of mobile and cordless phones and survival of patients with glioma. Neuroepidemiology 40:101–108. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chaichana KL, McGirt MJ, Laterra J, Olivi A, Quinones-Hinojosa A (2010) Recurrence and malignant degeneration after resection of adult hemispheric low-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg 112:10–17. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wessels PH, Weber WE, Raven G, Ramaekers FC, Hopman AH, Twijnstra A (2003) Supratentorial grade II astrocytoma: biological features and clinical course. Lancet Neurol 2:395–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wijnenga MMJ, Mattni T, French PJ, Rutten GJ, Leenstra S, Kloet F, Taphoorn MJB, van den Bent MJ, Dirven CMF, van Veelen ML, Vincent A (2017) Does early resection of presumed low-grade glioma improve survival? A clinical perspective. J Neurooncol 133:137–146. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vrijheid M, Armstrong BK, Bedard D, Brown J, Deltour I, Iavarone I, Krewski D, Lagorio S, Moore S, Richardson L, Giles GG, McBride M, Parent ME, Siemiatycki J, Cardis E (2009) Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones. J Exp Sci Environ Epidemiol 19:369–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP (2006) Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol 17:5–19. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schmidt LS, Nielsen H, Schmiedel S, Johansen C (2008) Social inequality and incidence of and survival from tumours of the central nervous system in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003. Eur J Cancer 44:2050–2057. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Olsson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liacine Bouaoun
    • 1
  • Anssi Auvinen
    • 2
  • Maria Feychting
    • 3
  • Christoffer Johansen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Tiit Mathiesen
    • 6
    • 7
  • Beatrice Melin
    • 8
  • Anna Lahkola
    • 9
  • Suvi Larjavaara
    • 10
  • Anne-Sophie Villegier
    • 11
  • Graham Byrnes
    • 1
  • Isabelle Deltour
    • 1
  • Joachim Schüz
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Environment and RadiationInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyon CEDEX 08France
  2. 2.Faculty of Social Sciences, Health SciencesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Oncology Clinic, 5073 RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  5. 5.Survivorship UnitThe Danish Cancer Society Research CenterCopenhagenDenmark
  6. 6.Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  7. 7.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  8. 8.Department of Radiation Sciences, OncologyUmeå University HospitalUmeåSweden
  9. 9.Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK)HelsinkiFinland
  10. 10.Helsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  11. 11.INERISToxicologie ExpérimentaleVerneuil-en-HalatteFrance

Personalised recommendations