Temporal stability of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients undergoing STUPP protocol
Epigenetic silencing of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter via methylation in a glioblastoma (GBM), has been correlated with a more favourable response to alkylating chemotherapeutic agents such as temozolomide. The use of global methylation surrogates such as Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element 1 (LINE1) may also be valuable in order to fully understand these highly heterogeneous tumours. In this study, we analysed both original and recurrent GBMs in 22 patients (i.e. 44 tumours), for both MGMT and LINE1 methylation status. In the 22 patients: 14 (63.6%) displayed MGMT methylation stability in the recurrent GBM versus 8 (36.4%), with instability of methylation status. No significant differences in overall and progression free survival was evident between these two groups. LINE1 methylation status remained stable for 12 (54.5%) of recurrent GBM patients versus 9 (41%) of the patients with instability in LINE1 methylation status (p = 0.02), resulting in an increase in overall survival of the stable LINE1 group (p = 0.04). The results obtained demonstrated major epigenetic instability of GBMs treated with temozolomide as part of the STUPP protocol. GBMs appear to undergo selective evolution post-treatment, and have the ability to recur with a newly reprogrammed epigenetic status. Selective targeting of the altered epigenomes in recurrent GBMs may facilitate the future development of both prognostic biomarkers and enhanced therapeutic strategies.
KeywordsGlioblastoma MGMT Temzolamide Methylation Epigenetics
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflict of interest in relation to this work.
- 5.Dunn J, Baborie A, Alam F, Joyce K, Moxham M, Sibson R, Crooks D, Husband D, Shenoy A, Brodbelt A, Wong H, Liloglou T, Haylock B, Walker C (2009) Extent of MGMT promoter methylation correlates with outcome in glioblastomas given temozolomide and radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 101(1):124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wang J, Cazzato E, Ladewig E, Frattini V, Rosenbloom DI, Zairis S, Abate F, Liu Z, Elliott O, Shin YJ, Lee JK, Lee IH, Park WY, Eoli M, Blumberg AJ, Lasorella A, Nam DH, Finocchiaro G, Iavarone A, Rabadan R (2016) Clonal evolution of glioblastoma under therapy. Nat Genet 48(7):768–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Dang L, White DW, Gross S, Bennett BD, Bittinger MA, Driggers EM, Fantin VR, Jang HG, Jin S, Keenan MC, Marks KM, Prins RM, Ward PS, Yen KE, Liau LM, Rabinowitz JD, Cantley LC, Thompson CB, Vander Heiden MG, Su SM (2010) Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 465(7300):966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ohka F, Natsume A, Motomura K, Kishida Y, Kondo Y, Abe T, Nakasu Y, Namba H, Wakai K, Fukui T, Momota H, Iwami K, Kinjo S, Ito M, Fujii M, Wakabayashi T (2011) The global DNA methylation surrogate LINE-1 methylation is correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and is a better prognostic factor for glioma. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lee EJ, Rath P, Liu J, Ryu D, Pei L, Noonepalle SK, Shull AY, Feng Q, Litofsky NS, Miller DC, Anthony DC, Kirk MD, Laterra J, Deng L, Xin HB, Wang X, Choi JH, Shi H (2015) Identification of global DNA methylation signatures in glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells. J Genet Genomics 42(7):355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Pession A, Tallini G, Bertorelle R, Bartolini S, Calbucci F, Andreoli A, Frezza G, Leonardi M, Spagnolli F, Ermani M (2008) MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol 26(13):2192–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Bacci A, Agati R, Ghimenton C, Turazzi S, Talacchi A, Skrap M, Marucci G, Volpin L, Morandi L, Pizzolitto S, Gardiman M, Andreoli A, Calbucci F, Ermani M (2010) O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase methylation status can change between first surgery for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and second surgery for recurrence: clinical implications. Neuro Oncol 12(3):283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ma DJ, Galanis E, Anderson SK, Schiff D, Kaufmann TJ, Peller PJ, Giannini C, Brown PD, Uhm JH, McGraw S, Jaeckle KA, Flynn PJ, Ligon KL, Buckner JC, Sarkaria JN (2015) A phase II trial of everolimus, temozolomide, and radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: NCCTG N057K. Neuro Oncol 17(9):1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Molenaar RJ, Verbaan D, Lamba S, Zanon C, Jeuken JW, Boots-Sprenger SH, Wesseling P, Hulsebos TJ, Troost D, van Tilborg AA, Leenstra S, Vandertop WP, Bardelli A, van Noorden CJ, Bleeker FE (2014) The combination of IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status predicts survival in glioblastoma better than either IDH1 or MGMT alone. Neuro Oncol 16(9):1263–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar