The neurofibromatoses (NF) are incurable genetic disorders that can cause nerve sheath tumors, chronic pain, and disfiguration. Patients with NF report lower quality of life and greater distress, and may benefit from programs that promote resiliency. To test effects of an 8-week mind–body program (Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for NF [3RP-NF]) on resiliency, using data derived from a larger randomized controlled trial of the 3RP-NF versus attention placebo control (Vranceanu et al. in Neurology 87:806–814, 2016). Participants (N = 63; 46 female; 52 White) were randomized to 3RP-NF (n = 32, Mage = 42.86) or control (n = 31, Mage = 39.90), completed intervention sessions via group videoconferencing, and provided self-report measures of resiliency (i.e., perceived coping abilities, perceived social support, gratitude, optimism, spiritual well-being, mindfulness) at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up. All participants attended at least 6/8 sessions and 83% (N = 52) provided 6-month follow-up data. The 3RP-NF (vs. control) produced greater improvements from pre- to post-intervention in perceived coping abilities (Mdifference = 6.68; p = .008), perceived social support (Mdifference = 9.16; p = .032), and mindfulness (Mdifference = 2.23; p = .035), which were maintained at 6-month follow up. We did not observe group differences in spiritual well-being, optimism, or gratitude. The 3RP-NF produced sustained increases in multiple dimensions of resiliency (perceived coping abilities, perceived social support, and mindfulness). Promoting resiliency may be particularly important for a population that is underserved and living with a chronic, incurable illness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study was fully funded by the Children’s Tumor Foundation through a clinical research grant awarded to Ana-Maria Vranceanu.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Emily L. Zale declares that she has no conflict of interest. Catherine Pierre-Louis declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eric A. Macklin declares that he has no conflict of interest. Eric Riklin declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ana-Maria Vranceanu declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Antinheimo J, Sankila R, Carpén O, Pukkala E, Sainio M, Jääskeläinen J (2000) Population-based analysis of sporadic and type 2 neurofibromatosis-associated meningiomas and schwannomas. Neurology 54:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolkenstein P, Zeller J, Revuz J, Ecosse E, Leplège A (2001) Quality-of-life impairment in neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study of 128 cases. Arch Dermatol 137:1421–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D (2002) Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med 24:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheier MF, Carver CS (1985) Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc 4:219–247Google Scholar
Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ (2005) Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B (2001) The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev 71:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower JE, Moskowitz JT, Epel E (2009) Is benefit finding good for your health? Pathways linking positive life changes after stress and physical health outcomes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar