Trends in childhood brain tumor incidence, 1973–2009
In the mid-1980s, there was a rise in incidence rates of childhood brain tumors (CBT) in the United States that appeared to stabilize at a higher rate in the early 1990s. An updated analysis of the pattern of CBT over the past 2 decades, with commentary on whether the elevated incidence rate has continued, is past due. We used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data to examine trends in incidence of CBT from 1973 through 2009. We examined age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIRs) and secular trends for all malignant brain tumors combined (SEER classification) by histologic tumor type and anatomic site. The incidence of CBT remained stable from 1987 to 2009 [annual percent change (APC) = 0.10; 95 % confidence intervals (CI) −0.39 to 0.61] with an AAIR for all CBT of 3.32 (95 % CI 3.22–3.42). The stability of rates in these two decades contrast the change that occurred in the mid-1980s (1983–1986), when the incidence of CBT increased by 53 % (APC = 14.06; 95 % CI 4.05–25.0). From 1983 to 1986, statistically significant rate increases were observed for pilocytic astrocytoma, PNET/medulloblastoma, and mixed glioma. Further, the rate of increase in pilocytic astrocytoma was similar to the rate of decrease for astrocytomas NOS from 1981 to 2009, suggesting a change from a more general to more specific classification. After the increase in rates in the mid-1980s, rates of CBT over the past two decades have stabilized. Changes in incidence rates of subtypes of tumors over this time period reflect changes both in classification of CBT and in diagnostic techniques.
KeywordsChildhood brain tumors Gender Histology Incidence rates Pediatric cancer Secular trends SEER
Funding for this research was provided by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01 CA116724]; the American Cancer Society [PTAPM-02-074-01]; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [2 T32 ES 013678-06]; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center, Grant #5P30ES07048; and the Ronald Ross, MD, Cancer Research Fund at the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 8.Fritz AG (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kohler BA, Ward E, McCarthy BJ, Schymura MJ, Ries LA, Eheman C, Jemal A, Anderson RN, Ajani UA, Edwards BK (2011) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:714–736. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr077 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Zulch K (1979) Histological typing of tumors of the central nervous system. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 17.McNeil DE, Cote TR, Clegg L, Mauer A (2002) SEER update of incidence and trends in pediatric malignancies: acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Med Pediatr Oncol 39:554–557; discussion 552–553Google Scholar
- 18.Kool M, Koster J, Bunt J, Hasselt NE, Lakeman A, van Sluis P, Troost D, Meeteren NS, Caron HN, Cloos J, Mrsić A, Ylstra B, Grajkowska W, Hartmann W, Pietsch T, Ellison D, Clifford SC, Versteeg R (2008) Integrated genomics identifies five medulloblastoma subtypes with distinct genetic profiles, pathway signatures and clinicopathological features. PLoS One 3:e3088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003088 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Thompson MC, Fuller C, Hogg TL, Dalton J, Finkelstein D, Lau CC, Chintagumpala M, Adesina A, Ashley DM, Kellie SJ, Taylor MD, Curran T, Gajjar A, Gilbertson RJ (2006) Genomics identifies medulloblastoma subgroups that are enriched for specific genetic alterations. J Clin Oncol 24:1924–1931. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4974 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Parsons DW, Li M, Zhang X, Jones S, Leary RJ, Lin JC, Boca SM, Carter H, Samayoa J, Bettegowda C, Gallia GL, Jallo GI, Binder ZA, Nikolsky Y, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Gerhard DS, Fults DW, VandenBerg S, Berger MS, Marie SK, Shinjo SM, Clara C, Phillips PC, Minturn JE, Biegel JA, Judkins AR, Resnick AC, Storm PB, Curran T, He Y, Rasheed BA, Friedman HS, Keir ST, McLendon R, Northcott PA, Taylor MD, Burger PC, Riggins GJ, Karchin R, Parmigiani G, Bigner DD, Yan H, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE (2011) The genetic landscape of the childhood cancer medulloblastoma. Science 331:435–439. doi: 10.1126/science.1198056 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kleihues P, Cavenee WK (eds) (2000) World Health Organisation classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 24.Pomeroy SL, Tamayo P, Gaasenbeek M, Sturla LM, Angelo M, McLaughlin ME, Kim JY, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Lau C, Allen JC, Zagzag D, Olson JM, Curran T, Wetmore C, Biegel JA, Poggio T, Mukherjee S, Rifkin R, Califano A, Stolovitzky G, Louis DN, Mesirov JP, Lander ES, Golub TR (2002) Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 415:436–442. doi: 10.1038/415436a415436a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Louis DNOH, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) (2007) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 28.U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008) Medicare part B imaging services: rapid spending growth and shift to physician offices indicate need for CMS to consider additional management practices (GAO-08-452). Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 5–13Google Scholar
- 29.Davis FG, Malmer BS, Aldape K, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bondy ML, Brannstrom T, Bruner JM, Burger PC, Collins VP, Inskip PD, Kruchko C, McCarthy BJ, McLendon RE, Sadetzki S, Tihan T, Wrensch MR, Buffler PA (2008) Issues of diagnostic review in brain tumor studies: from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:484–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kazner E, Wende S, Grumme T, Stochdorph FR, Claussen C (eds) (1989) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography of intracranial tumors—a clinical perspective. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar