Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 113, Issue 3, pp 495–503 | Cite as

Stereotactic laser induced thermotherapy (LITT): a novel treatment for brain lesions regrowing after radiosurgery

  • Juan Torres-Reveron
  • Hilarie C. Tomasiewicz
  • Anil Shetty
  • Nduka M. Amankulor
  • Veronica L. Chiang
Clinical Study


Since the inception of radiosurgery, the management of brain metastases has become a common problem for neurosurgeons. Although the use of stereotactic radiosurgery and/or whole brain radiation therapy serves to control the majority of disease burden, patients who survive longer than 6–8 months sometimes face the problem of symptomatic radiographically regrowing lesions with few treatment options. Here we investigate the feasibility of use of MRI-guided stereotactic laser induced thermotherapy (LITT) as a novel treatment option for these lesions. Six patients who had previously undergone gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases were selected. All patients had an initial favorable response to radiosurgery but subsequently developed regrowth of at least one lesion associated with recurrent edema and progressive neurological symptoms requiring ongoing steroids for symptom control. All lesions were evaluated for craniotomy, but were deemed unresectable due to deep location or patient’s comorbidities. Stereotactic biopsies were performed prior to the thermotherapy procedure in all cases. LITT was performed using the Visualase system and follow-up MRI imaging was used to determine treatment response. In all six patients biopsy results were negative for tumor and consistent with adverse radiation effects also known as radiation necrosis. Patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged from the hospital within 48 h of the procedure. In 4/6 cases there was durable improvement of neurological symptoms until death. In all cases steroids were weaned off within 2 months. One patient died from systemic causes related to his cancer a month after the procedure. One patient had regrowth of the lesion 3 months after the procedure and required re-initiation of steroids and standard craniotomy for surgical resection. There were no complications directly related to the thermocoagulation procedure. Stereotactic laser induced thermotherapy is a feasible alternative for the treatment of symptomatic regrowing metastatic lesions after radiosurgery. The procedure carries minimal morbidity and, in this small series, shows some effectiveness in the symptomatic relief of edema and neurological symptoms paralleled by radiographic lesional control. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the safety of this technology.


Radiation necrosis Thermocoagulation Thermotherapy Metastases 


Conflict of interest

A.S. is an employee of Visualase Inc. and equity holder of the company. The rest of the authors declare that they have no financial conflicts.

Supplementary material

11060_2013_1142_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (572 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 571 kb)


  1. 1.
    Grimm SA (2012) Treatment of brain metastases: chemotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 14:85–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown SG (1983) Phototherapy of tumors. World J Surg 7:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sugiyama K, Sakai T, Fujishima I, Ryu H, Uemura K, Yokoyama T (1990) Stereotactic interstitial laser-hyperthermia using Nd:YAG laser. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 54–55:501–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ascher PW, Justich E, Schrottner O (1991) Interstitial thermotherapy of central brain tumors with the Nd:YAG laser under real-time monitoring by MRI. J Clin Laser Med Surg 9:79–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fan M, Ascher PW, Schrottner O, Ebner F, Germann RH, Kleinert R (1992) Interstitial 1.06 Nd:YAG laser thermotherapy for brain tumors under real-time monitoring of MRI: experimental study and phase 1 clinical trial. J Clin Laser Med Surg 10:355–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakai T, Fujishima I, Sugiyama K, Ryu H, Uemura K (1992) Interstitial laserthermia in neurosurgery. J Clin Laser Med Surg 10:37–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahn T, Bettag M, Ulrich F, Schwarzmaier H-J, Schober R, Furst G, Modder U (1994) MRI-guided laser induced interstitial thermotherapy of cerebral neoplasms. J Comp Assist Tomog 18:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menovsky T, Beek JF, van Gemert MJC, Roux FX, Bown SG (1996) Interstitial laser thermotherapy in neurosurgery: a review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138:1019–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kangasniemi M, McNichols RJ, Bankson JA, Gowda A, Price RE, Hazle JD (2004) Thermal therapy of canine cerebral tumor using a 980 nm diode laser with MR temperature sensitive imaging feedback. Lasers Surg Med 35:41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNichols RJ, Kangasniemi M, Gowda A, Bankson JA, Price RE, Hazle JD (2004) Technical developments for cerebral thermal treatment water-cooled diffusing laser fiber tips and temperature-sensitive MRI using intersecting image planes. Int J Hyperthermia 20:45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McNichols RJ, Gowda A, Kangasniemi M, Bankson JA, Price RE, Hazle JD (2004) MR thermometry-based feedback control of laser interstitial thermal therapy at 980 nm. Lasers SurgMed 34:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svaasand L (1995) Physics of laser-induced hyperthermia. In: Welch AJ, van Gemert MJC (eds) Optical–thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue. Plenum Press, New York, pp 765–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel TR, McHugh BJ, Bi WL, Minja FJ, Knisely JP, Chiang VL (2011) A comprehensive review of MR imaging changes following radiosurgery to 500 brain metastases. AJNR 32:1885–1892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rauch PJ, Park HS, Knisely JPS, Chiang VL, Vortmeyer AO (2012) Delayed radiation-induced vasculitic leukoencephalopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:369–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patel SH, Robbins JR, Gore EM, Bradley JD, Gaspar LE, Germano I et al (2012) ACR appropriateness criteria follow-up and retreatment of brain metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 35:302–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kwon K-Y, Kong D-S, Lee J-I, Nam D-H, Park K, Kim JH (2007) Outcome of repeated radiosurgery for recurrent metastatic brain tumors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:132–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gofton TE, Graber J, Carver A (2012) Identifying the palliative care needs of patients living with cerebral tumors and metastases: a retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 108:527–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bindal RK, Sawaya R, Leavens ME, Hess KR, Taylor SH (1995) Reoperation for recurrent metastatic brain tumors. J Neurosurg 83:600–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levin VA, Bidaut L, Hou P, Kumar AJ, Wefel JS, Bekele N, Prabhu S, Loghin M, Gilbert MR, Jackson EF (2011) Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:1487–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rahmathulla G, Recinos PF, Valerio JE, Chao S, Barnett GH (2012) Laser interstitial thermal therapy for focal cerebral radiation necrosis: a case report and literature review. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 90:192–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schulze CP, Kahn T, Harth T, Schwarzmaier H-J, Schober R (1998) Correlation of neuropathologic findings and phase-based MRI temperature maps in experimental laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy. JMRI 8:115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kahn T, Harth T, Kiwit JC, Schwarzmaier H-J, Wald C, Modder U (1998) In vivo MRI thermometry using a phase-sensitive sequence: preliminary experience during MRI guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy of brain tumors. JMRI 8:160–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwarzmaier H-J, Yaroslavsky IV, Yaroslavsky AN, Fiedler V, Ulrich F, Kahn T (1998) Treatment planning for MRI-guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy of brain tumors—the role of blood perfusion. JMRI 8:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang SC, Zhang XX (2005) Effect of dynamic changes of tissue properties during laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT). Laser Med Sci 19:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puccini S, Bär N-K, Bublat M, Kahn T, Busse H (2003) Simulations of thermal tissue coagulation and their value for the planning and monitoring of laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT). Magn Reson Med 49:351–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matsumoto R, Mulkern RV, Hushek SG, Jolesz FA (1994) Tissue temperature monitoring for thermal interventional therapy: comparison of T1-weighted MR sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:65–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Atsumi H, Matsumae M, Kaneda M, Muro I, Mamata Y, Komiya T, Tsugu A, Tsugane R (2001) Novel laser system and laser irradiation method reduced the risk of carbonization during laser interstitial thermotherapy: assessed by MR temperature measurement. Laser Surg Med 29:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carpentier A, McNichols RJ, Stafford RJ, Itzcovitz J, Guichard J-P, Reizine D, Delaloge S, Vicaut E, Prayen D, Gowda A, George B (2008) Real-time magnetic resonance-guided laser thermal therapy for focal metastatic brain tumors. Neurosurgery 63(ONS Suppl 1):ONS 21–ONS 29Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schwabe B, Kahn T, Harth T, Ulrich F, Schwarzmaier H-J (1997) Laser induced thermal lesions in the human brain: short and long-term appearance on MRI. J Comp Assist Tomogr 21:818–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Torres-Reveron
    • 1
  • Hilarie C. Tomasiewicz
    • 2
  • Anil Shetty
    • 3
  • Nduka M. Amankulor
    • 1
    • 4
  • Veronica L. Chiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuroscienceMount Sinai School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Visualase Inc.HoustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations