Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 107, Issue 1, pp 183–189 | Cite as

Predictors of survival among older adults with ependymoma

  • E. Susan Amirian
  • Terri S. Armstrong
  • Mark R. Gilbert
  • Michael E. Scheurer
Clinical Study – Patient Study

Abstract

The biological process of aging encompasses a multitude of complex physiological and lifestyle changes that may alter the way typical prognostic factors affect survival among older ependymoma patients. Because very little is known about the clinical significance of traditional prognostic factors and the magnitude of their effects among older individuals, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between survival and demographic and tumor characteristics among patients with ependymoma who were 60 years of age or older. Using the 1973–2007 dataset from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program, we evaluated the impact of several factors on both overall and ependymoma-specific survival, utilizing multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. We identified 367 ependymoma cases who were 60 years of age or older at diagnosis and had complete data from SEER. Of these, 19 (5.2%) had anaplastic tumors; all others were low-grade tumors. Age, tumor site, extent of surgery, and tumor histology were found to be significant predictors of ependymoma prognosis. The strongest predictor of poor outcome was supratentorial tumor location (adjusted HR: 6.94, 95% CI: 3.19–15.08, compared to spinal cord tumors). Our study suggests that tumor location, tumor histology, and surgical margin may be key predictors of survival among older ependymoma patients. We believe our study is one of the first to assess the prognostic value of these factors for ependymoma survival exclusively in an older patient population.

Keywords

Ependymoma Survival SEER program Prognosis Older adults 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Collaborative Ependymoma Research Network for their support. This work was partially funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (K07CA131505 to MES).

Disclosure

M.R. Gilbert served on advisory boards for Genentech and Schering-Plough, from which he has also received research support. No other conflicts of interest relevant to these analyses were declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller RA (1991) Gerontology as oncology. Research on aging as the key to the understanding of cancer. Cancer 68(11):2496–2501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rowland JH, Yancik R (2006) Cancer survivorship: the interface of aging, comorbidity, and quality care. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(8):504–505. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj154 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller RA (1991) Aging and immune function. Int Rev Cytol 124:187–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bureau USC General Demographic Characteristics (2008) Population Estimates. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 25 January 2011
  5. 5.
    Avis NE, Deimling GT (2008) Cancer survivorship and aging. Cancer 113(12):3519–3529. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23941 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellizzi KM, Mustian KM, Palesh OG, Diefenbach M (2008) Cancer survivorship and aging : moving the science forward. Cancer 113(12):3530–3539. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23942 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilbert MR, Ruda R, Soffietti R (2010) Ependymomas in adults. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 10(3):240–247. doi: 10.1007/s11910-010-0109-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reni M, Gatta G, Mazza E, Vecht C (2007) Ependymoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 63(1):81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.03.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG (2009) Incidence patterns for ependymoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. J Neurosurg 110(4):725–729. doi: 10.3171/2008.9.JNS08117 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armstrong TS, Vera-Bolanos E, Bekele BN, Aldape K, Gilbert MR (2010) Adult ependymal tumors: prognosis and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Neuro Oncol 12(8):862–870. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reni M, Brandes AA, Vavassori V, Cavallo G, Casagrande F, Vastola F, Magli A, Franzin A, Basso U, Villa E (2004) A multicenter study of the prognosis and treatment of adult brain ependymal tumors. Cancer 100(6):1221–1229. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20074 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodriguez D, Cheung MC, Housri N, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Camphausen K, Koniaris LG (2009) Outcomes of malignant CNS ependymomas: an examination of 2408 cases through the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database (1973–2005). J Surg Res 156(2):340–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metellus P, Figarella-Branger D, Guyotat J, Barrie M, Giorgi R, Jouvet A, Chinot O (2008) Supratentorial ependymomas: prognostic factors and outcome analysis in a retrospective series of 46 adult patients. Cancer 113(1):175–185. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23530 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boss GR, Seegmiller JE (1981) Age-related physiological changes and their clinical significance. West J Med 135(6):434–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muss HB, Woolf S, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Weiss RB, Budman D, Wood WC, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Winer E, Cohen H, Wheeler J, Norton L (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy in older and younger women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. JAMA 293(9):1073–1081. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1073 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS (2003) Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: a retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer 97(11):2869–2879. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11407 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Metellus P, Guyotat J, Chinot O, Durand A, Barrie M, Giorgi R, Jouvet A, Figarella-Branger D (2010) Adult intracranial WHO grade II ependymomas: long-term outcome and prognostic factor analysis in a series of 114 patients. Neuro Oncol 12(9):976–984. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq047 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaw EG, Evans RG, Scheithauer BW, Ilstrup DM, Earle JD (1987) Postoperative radiotherapy of intracranial ependymoma in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13(10):1457–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kovalic JJ, Flaris N, Grigsby PW, Pirkowski M, Simpson JR, Roth KA (1993) Intracranial ependymoma long term outcome, patterns of failure. J Neurooncol 15(2):125–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldwein JW, Leahy JM, Packer RJ, Sutton LN, Curran WJ, Rorke LB, Schut L, Littman PS, D’Angio GJ (1990) Intracranial ependymomas in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19(6):1497–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Metellus P, Barrie M, Figarella-Branger D, Chinot O, Giorgi R, Gouvernet J, Jouvet A, Guyotat J (2007) Multicentric French study on adult intracranial ependymomas: prognostic factors analysis and therapeutic considerations from a cohort of 152 patients. Brain 130(Pt 5):1338–1349. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm046 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rousseau P, Habrand JL, Sarrazin D, Kalifa C, Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Rekacewicz C, Rey A (1994) Treatment of intracranial ependymomas of children: review of a 15-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 28(2):381–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crivellari D, Aapro M, Leonard R, von Minckwitz G, Brain E, Goldhirsch A, Veronesi A, Muss H (2007) Breast cancer in the elderly. J Clin Oncol 25(14):1882–1890. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2079 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vitanovics D, Balint K, Hanzely Z, Banczerowski P, Afra D (2010) Ependymoma in adults: surgery, reoperation and radiotherapy for survival. Pathol Oncol Res 16(1):93–99. doi: 10.1007/s12253-009-9194-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Susan Amirian
    • 1
  • Terri S. Armstrong
    • 3
  • Mark R. Gilbert
    • 4
  • Michael E. Scheurer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dan L Duncan Cancer CenterBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Integrative Nursing CareUTHSC-SONHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Neuro-OncologyUT-MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations