Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 111–119

Factors impacting volumetric white matter changes following whole brain radiation therapy

  • Nicholas Szerlip
  • Charles Rutter
  • Nilam Ram
  • Susannah Yovino
  • Young Kwok
  • William Maggio
  • William F. Regine
Clinical Study – Patient Study
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is one of the most effective modalities for treatment of brain metastases. With increasing cancer control there is growing concern regarding the long-term effects of treatment. These effects are seen as white matter change (WMC) on brain MRI. Severity of WMC is implicated in cognitive and functional decline in many patient groups. Our objective was to identify clinical factors associated with greater accumulation of WMC following WBRT. Through retrospective review of serial MRIs obtained from 30 patients surviving greater than 1 year after WBRT, treated at a single institution between 2002 and 2007, we calculated volumetric WMC over time using segmentation software. Changes related to tumor, secondary effects, surgery or radiosurgery were excluded. Factors that influenced the rate of WMC accumulation were identified through multivariate analysis. Following WBRT, patients accumulated WMC at an average rate of 0.07% of total brain volume per month. In multivariate analyses, greater rates of accumulation were independently associated with older age (β = 0.004, p < .0001), poor levels of glycemic control (β = 0.048, p < .0001) and hypertension diagnosis (β = 0.084, p < .0001). Long-term survivors of cancer allow assessment of late effects of treatment modalities. Radiation injury appears to be related to a steady rate of white matter damage over time, as indicated by progressive accumulation of WMC. Our results suggest that rate of WMC accumulation is enhanced by parameters such as hyperglycemia and hypertension. This has significant clinical impact by clearly identifying hyperglycemia, steroid-induced hyperglycemia, and other vascular risk factors as targets for intervention to decrease WMC in patients receiving WBRT.

Keywords

Radiation Longitudinal change 

References

  1. 1.
    Fujii O et al (2006) White matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging following whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases. Radiat Med 24(5):345–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johannesen TB et al (2003) Radiological and clinical assessment of long-term brain tumour survivors after radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 69(2):169–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong CL et al (2004) A critical review of the clinical effects of therapeutic irradiation damage to the brain: the roots of controversy. Neuropsychol Rev 14(1):65–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bazin PL et al (2007) Volumetric neuroimage analysis extensions for the MIPAV software package. J Neurosci Methods 165(1):111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breteler MM et al (1994) Cognitive correlates of ventricular enlargement and cerebral white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. The Rotterdam study. Stroke 25(6):1109–1115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deary IJ et al (2006) White matter integrity and cognition in childhood and old age. Neurology 66(4):505–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deary IJ et al (2003) Cerebral white matter abnormalities and lifetime cognitive change: a 67-year follow-up of the Scottish mental survey of 1932. Psychol Aging 18(1):140–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leaper SA et al (2001) Neuropsychologic correlates of brain white matter lesions depicted on MR images: 1921 Aberdeen Birth Cohort. Radiology 221(1):51–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emami B et al (1991) Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21(1):109–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Connor MM, Mayberg MR (2000) Effects of radiation on cerebral vasculature: a review. Neurosurgery 46(1):138–149 (discussion 150–1)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schultheiss TE et al (1995) Radiation response of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1093–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Armstrong CL et al (2002) Late cognitive and radiographic changes related to radiotherapy: initial prospective findings. Neurology 59(1):40–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pantoni L et al (2002) Visual rating scales for age-related white matter changes (leukoaraiosis): can the heterogeneity be reduced? Stroke 33(12):2827–2833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Correa DD et al (2004) Cognitive functions in survivors of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Neurology 62(4):548–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neuwelt EA et al (2005) Imaging changes and cognitive outcome in primary CNS lymphoma after enhanced chemotherapy delivery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(2):258–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shan ZY et al (2006) Quantitative morphologic evaluation of white matter in survivors of childhood medulloblastoma. Magn Reson Imaging 24(8):1015–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van den Heuvel DM et al (2006) Measuring longitudinal white matter changes: comparison of a visual rating scale with a volumetric measurement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(4):875–878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bastin ME et al (2009) Diffusion tensor and magnetization transfer MRI measurements of periventricular white matter hyperintensities in old age. Neurobiol Aging 30(1):125–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu M et al (2006) A fully automated method for quantifying and localizing white matter hyperintensities on MR images. Psychiatry Res 148(2–3):133–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Starr JM et al (2003) Brain white matter lesions detected by magnetic resonance [correction of resonance] imaging are associated with balance and gait speed. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(1):94–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shenkin SD et al (2005) Cognitive correlates of cerebral white matter lesions and water diffusion tensor parameters in community-dwelling older people. Cerebrovasc Dis 20(5):310–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reddick WE et al (2006) Smaller white-matter volumes are associated with larger deficits in attention and learning among long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 106(4):941–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Sullivan M et al (2001) Evidence for cortical “disconnection” as a mechanism of age-related cognitive decline. Neurology 57(4):632–638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duckworth W et al (2009) Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 360(2):129–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murray AD et al (2005) Brain white matter hyperintensities: relative importance of vascular risk factors in nondemented elderly people. Radiology 237(1):251–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Welzel T et al (2008) Diffusion tensor imaging screening of radiation-induced changes in the white matter after prophylactic cranial irradiation of patients with small cell lung cancer: first results of a prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(2):379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martini SR, Kent TA (2007) Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: a vascular perspective. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27(3):435–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gallagher KA et al (2006) Hyperbaric oxygen and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells in diabetic wound healing. Vascular 14(6):328–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Szerlip
    • 1
  • Charles Rutter
    • 2
  • Nilam Ram
    • 3
  • Susannah Yovino
    • 2
  • Young Kwok
    • 2
  • William Maggio
    • 1
  • William F. Regine
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Maryland Medical CenterBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland Medical CenterBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations