Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 277–280 | Cite as

Vinorelbine combined with a protracted course of temozolomide for recurrent brain Metastases: a phase I trial

  • A.M. Omuro
  • J.J. Raizer
  • A. Demopoulos
  • M.G. Malkin
  • L.E. Abrey
Clinical–patient studies

Summary

Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown modest efficacy in the treatment of recurrent brain metastasis (BM). We designed a new regimen utilizing dose-intensified, protracted course of TMZ in combination with vinorelbine, a lipophilic large-spectrum agent, in an attempt to improve the efficacy of TMZ. This phase I study was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine for this combination. Patients with recurrent or progressive BM were eligible. Chemotherapy consisted of 28-day cycles with TMZ (150 mg/m2, days 1–7 and 15–21) and vinorelbine (days one and eight at escalating doses). The starting dose was 15 mg/m2, with increments of 5 mg/m2 for each cohort of 3–6 patients, until MTD was reached (30 mg/m2). A total of 21 patients were enrolled; the median age was 59 (41–77). The primary tumor was lung cancer in 13 patients (NSCLC in 10, SCLC in 3), breast in 6, renal in 1 and endometrial in 1. Vinorelbine dose was 15 mg/m2 in seven patients, 20 mg/m2 in five, 25 mg/m2 in four and 30 mg/m2 in six. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia developed in six patients, lymphopenia in nine, and thrombocytopenia in six; other toxicities were rare. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen. Out of 18 evaluable patients 2 had a radiographic response (one partial and one minor). Disease was stable in 6 of 18 patients and the median survival was 27 weeks. This regimen was well tolerated and a phase II trial using a dose of 30 mg/m2 of vinorelbine is warranted.

Keywords

Brain metastasis breast cancer chemotherapy clinical trial lung cancer temozolomide vinorelbine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Dr. Abrey has received honoraria and grant support from Schering Plough, Inc. This study was supported in part by an unrestricted educational grant from Schering Plough, Inc.

References

  1. 1.
    Omuro AM, Abrey LE, 2004 Brain metastases Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 4: 205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrey LE, Olson JD, Raizer JJ, et al., 2001 A phase II trial of temozolomide for patients with recurrent or progressive brain metastases J Neurooncol 53:259–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christodoulou C, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, et al., 2001 Phase II study of temozolomide in heavily pretreated cancer patients with brain metastases Ann Oncol 12: 249–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verger E, Gil M, Yaya R, et al., 2005 Temozolomide and concomitant whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a phase II randomized trial Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61: 185–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonadou D, Paraskevaidis M, Sarris G, et al., 2002 Phase II randomized trial of temozolomide and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases J Clin Oncol 20: 3644–3650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dziadziuszko R, Ardizzoni A, Postmus PE, et al., 2003 Temozolomide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group (08965) Eur J Cancer 39: 1271–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bafaloukos D, Gogas H, Georgoulias V, et al., 2002 Temozolomide in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group J Clin Oncol 20: 420–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van den Bent MJ, 2003 The role of chemotherapy in brain metastases Eur J Cancer 39: 2114–2120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wick W, Steinbach JP, Kuker WM, Dichgans J, Bamberg M, Weller M, 2004 One week on/one week off: A novel active regimen of temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma Neurology 62: 2113–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG, 1990 Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma J Clin Oncol 21:3547–3549Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al., 2003 Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules Br J Cancer 88: 1004–1011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enting RH, Demopoulos A, DeAngelis LM, Abrey LE, 2004 Salvage therapy for primary CNS lymphoma with a combination of rituximab and temozolomide Neurology 63: 901–903PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregory RK, Smith IE, 2000 Vinorelbine – a clinical review Br J Cancer 82: 1907–1913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobayashi S, Sakai T, Dalrymple PD, Wood SG, Chasseaud LF, 1993 Disposition of the novel anticancer agent vinorelbine ditartrate following intravenous administration in mice, rats and dogs Arzneimittelforschung 43: 1367–1377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mouchard-Delmas C, Gourdier B, Vistelle R, Wiczewski M, 1996 Modification of the blood–brain barrier permeability by vinorelbine: effect of intracarotid infusion compared with intravenous infusion Anticancer Drugs 7: 213–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donadio M, Ardine M, Berruti A, et al., 2003 Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52: 147–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colleoni M, Graiff C, Nelli P, et al., 1997 Activity of combination chemotherapy in brain metastases from breast and lung adenocarcinoma Am J Clin Oncol 20: 303–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bernardo G, Cuzzoni Q, Strada MR, et al., 2002 First-line chemotherapy with vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and carboplatin in the treatment of brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study Cancer Invest 20: 293–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quantin X, Khial F, Reme-Saumon M, Michel FB, Pujol JL, 1999 Concomitant brain radiotherapy and vinorelbine–ifosfamide–cisplatin chemotherapy in brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer Lung Cancer 26: 35–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cortes J, Rodriguez J, Aramendia JM, et al., 2003 Front-line paclitaxel/cisplatin-based chemotherapy in brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer Oncology 64: 28–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robinet G, Thomas P, Breton JL, et al., 2001 Results of a phase III study of early versus delayed whole brain radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and vinorelbine combination in inoperable brain metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer: Groupe Francais de Pneumo-Cancerologie (GFPC) Protocol 95–1 Ann Oncol 12: 59–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurzrock R, Benjamin RS, 2005 Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, revisited N Engl J Med 352: 930–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horstmann E, McCabe MS, Grochow L, et al., 2005 Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002 N Engl J Med 352: 895–904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.M. Omuro
    • 1
  • J.J. Raizer
    • 1
  • A. Demopoulos
    • 1
  • M.G. Malkin
    • 1
  • L.E. Abrey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations