Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 623–644 | Cite as

Paul Valéry’s implex, or that by which we remain contingent, conditional

  • Berkay UstunEmail author
Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

This article argues for the relevance of what Paul Valéry called the “implex”, to philosophical areas of interest like potentiality and virtuality, and scientific areas of interest like developmental psychology and theories of learning. It offers an exposition of the wider context of Valéry’s coinage, by delving into his extensive notebooks, in addition to its immediate place of introduction, Idée fixe. As a majority of Valéry’s comments and reflections on the concept are suggestive and provisional, the article attempts to piece together a background that must have been generative for it. The implex is traced to its larger context of emergence through an engagement with several anticipatory or accompanying models like organs, machines and faculties.

Keywords

Contingency Development Capacities Virtuality Reflex Habit 

Notes

References

  1. Adorno, T. (2018). Aesthetics (W. Hoban, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste, É. (1971). Subjectivity in language. In Problems in general linguistics. Miami: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
  3. Canguilhem, G. (2008). Machine and organism. In Paola Marrati & Todd Meyers (Eds.), Knowledge of life (pp. 75–98). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carlisle, C. (2013). The question of habit in theology and philosophy: From hexis to plasticity. Body & Society,19(2&3), 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. (1995). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fedrigo, G. (2007). Gladiator, l’atleta del possibile: Valéry e lo «sport della mente». Rome: Qui Edit.Google Scholar
  7. Gauchet, M. (1992). Un réflexologue inconnu: Valéry. In L’inconscient cérébral (pp. 153–170). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  8. Landy, J. (2014). How to do things with fictions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Malabou, C. (2008). Addiction and grace: Preface to Félix Ravaisson’s Of habit. In F. Ravaisson, Of habit (C. Carlisle & M. Sinclair, Trans.) (pp. VII–XX). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  10. Malabou, C. (2016). Before tomorrow: Epigenesis and rationality. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Child Psychology and pedagogy: The Sorbonne lectures 1949–1952. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nietzsche, Friedrich. (2001). Beyond good and evil. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Valéry, P. (1965). Idée fixe: A dialogue by the sea. New York: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Valéry, P. (1989). Monsieur teste. New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Valéry, P. (1970). Occasions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Valéry, P. (2001). Cahiers = Notebooks (Ed. B. Stimpson, P. Gifford, R. Pickering & N. Rinsler), Vols. 1–5. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Weatherby, L. (2016). Transplanting the metaphysical organ. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zaccarello, B., Rey, J.-M. & Desideri, F. (2012). Paul Valéry: strategie del sensibile. Aisthesis1(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
  21. Zavershneva, E. (2015). Vygotsky the unpublished: An overview of the personal archive (1912–1934). In A. Yasnitsky & R. Van der Veer (Eds.), Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies: The state of the art (pp. 94–127). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Translation and InterpretingBeykent UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations