Advertisement

Neohelicon

pp 1–14 | Cite as

Unnatural narratives in Sam Shepard’s Mad Dog Blues

  • Hossein Pirnajmuddin
  • Omid AmaniEmail author
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

The main focus of this article is the term “unnatural” in a narratological analysis of Sam Shepard’s Mad Dog Blues (1971) in the light of ‘possible worlds’ theory. The term is recently coined and, in Jan Alber’s definition, designates those physically, logically, and even humanly impossible scenarios and events—according to the cognitive model of possible worlds—that challenge our real world knowledge. Mad Dog Blues is deemed to be one of the most complicated, fast-moving, and vividly imaginative but also obscure and puzzling of Shepard’s plays. The play in postmodernist fashion teems with a simultaneous collage-like collection of different types of unnatural narratives and storyworlds. It starts with a self-reflexive postmodern list; confronts us with unnatural characters; deconstructs our real-world knowledge about time and temporal progress; and presents us with impossible spaces. The analysis of the play in this essay is based on Jan Alber’s reading strategies which are meant to naturalize the play’s unnatural narratives.

Keywords

Sam Shepard’s Mad Dog Blues Jan Alber Unnatural narratives Cognitive poetics Possible worlds Postmodernism 

Notes

References

  1. Alber, J. (2009). Impossible storyworlds—and what to do with them. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 1, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alber, J. (2013). Unnatural narratology: The systematic study of anti-mimeticism. Literature Compass, 10(5), 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alber, J. (2016a). Absurd catalogues: The functions of lists in postmodern fiction. Style, 50(3), 342–358.Google Scholar
  4. Alber, J. (2016b). Unnatural narrative: Impossible worlds in fiction and drama. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alber, J., & Fludernik, M. (2010). Postclassical narratology: Approaches and analyses. Columbus: Ohio State UP.Google Scholar
  6. Alber, J., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2013a). A poetics of unnatural narrative. Columbus: Ohio State UP.Google Scholar
  7. Alber, J., Ivesren, S., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2013b). “What really is unnatural narratology?”. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 5, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baudrillard, J. (1998). Paroxysm: Interviews with Philippe Petit. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Belknap, R. (2000). The literary list: A survey of its uses and deployments. Literary Imagination, 2(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, A., & Alber, J. (2015). Ontological metalepsis and unnatural narratology. Journal of Narrative Theory, 42(2), 166–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bottoms, S. J. (1998). The theater of Sam Shepard, states of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creedon, E. (2015). Sam Shepard and the aesthetics of performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilman, R. (1984). Introduction in Sam Shepard’s seven plays. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  14. Herman, D. (1999). Introduction. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narratologies: New perspectives on narrative analysis (pp. 1–30). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nünning, A., & Sommer, R. (2008). Diegetic and mimetic narrativity: Some further steps towards a narratology of drama. In J. Pier & J. Á. García Landa (Eds.), Theorizing narrativity (pp. 331–354). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ryan, M.-L. (2006). From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology, and narrative. Poetics Today, 27(4), 633–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saddik, A. J. (2007). Contemporary American drama (Edinburgh critical guides to literature). Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.Google Scholar
  19. Shepard, S. (1984). Fool for love and other plays. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  20. Shepard, S. (1986). Unseen hand and other plays. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  21. Siegel, M. (1982). Holy ghosts: The mythic cowboy in the plays of Sam Shepard. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 36(4), 235–246.Google Scholar
  22. Sommer, R. (2005). Drama and narrative. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 119–124). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Stambolian, G. (1974). Shepard’s M ad dog blues: A trip through popular culture. Journal of Popular Culture, 1, 776–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.English DepartmentUniversity of IsfahanIsfahanIran
  2. 2.English DepartmentMalayer UniversityMalayerIran

Personalised recommendations