Fictionality as a rhetorical resource in Zuozhuan
Zuozhuan (Spring and autumn annals with Zuo’s commentary) initiated a narrative practice in Chinese historiography, which features not only records of historical events, but also various mysterious and unsubstantiated phenomena, such as divinations, omens, acts of mystical justice, apparitions and dreams. They played important roles for interpreting fictionality as a rhetorical resource in Zuozhuan. To elaborate fictionality and its competing relations with factuality, this paper subscribes to some Chinese scholars’ idea that it is from Zuozhuan on that fictionality endows Chinese historiography some “literary cover”, and analyzes those events in Zuozhuan. Moreover, enlightened by a rhetorical approach to fictionality proposed by Nielson, Phelan, and Walsh, this paper examines fictionality in Zuozhuan in terms of communicative intent, sender of fictionality, receivers of fictionality, and consequences on the logos and ethos. It argues that the communicative intent of Zuozhuan facilitates its compiler to utilize various means of fictionality so that the receivers conceive many interpretive assumptions, thus shedding much light to later generations in composing history.
KeywordsFictionality Rhetorical approach to fictionality Zuozhuan
This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant Number: 17ZDA281). And I want to express my most sincere gratitude for the instructive suggestions made by anonymous reviewers as well as Professor Shang Biwu.
- Fang, X. (1934). Zuozhuan tonglun [A general introduction to the Zuozhuan]. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
- Fu, X. (1999). Xianqin xushi yanjiu: Guanyu zhongguo xushi chuantong de xingcheng [Studies on the pre-Qin narration: On the formation of Chinese narrative tradition]. Beijing: The Oriental Press.Google Scholar
- Kern, M. (2013). Zaoqi zhongguo wenxue: kaiduan zhi xihan [Early Chinese literature: From the beginning to West-Han dynasty] (Liu Qian Trans.). In Stephen Owen (Ed.), Jianqiao zhongguo wenxueshi: Shangjuan 1375 nianzhiqian [The Cambridge history of Chinese literature: Volumn 1, Before 1375] (Liu Qian et al. Trans.) (pp. 27–148). Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing.Google Scholar
- Legge, J. (2011). Prolegomena. In Tso K. (Ed.), The Chinese classics, Vol. 5: The Ch’un Te’ew with The Tso Chuen. (Liu Jiahe, et al. Eds., & Legge J. Trans.) (pp. 1–53). Shanghai: East Normal University Press. [Rpt. From the 1960 Hong Kong version].Google Scholar
- Luo, J. (2006). Wenhua he chuantong zai “zhongguo zaoqi xushiwen” zhong de mishi [Loss of culture and tradition in “Early Chinese narratives”—Criticism on C. Y. Wang’s studies on the Zuozhuan]. Zhongguo wenhua yanjiu [Studies of Chinese culture], 2, 152–161.Google Scholar
- Luo, J. (2007). Zouchu yigushidai de Zuozhuanxue yanjiu [The Zuozhuan studies stepping out of a skeptical era—Literature review to the past three decades]. Wenxue qianyan [Frontiers of literature], 1 , 253–274.Google Scholar
- Pan, W. (2004). Zuozhuan xushi moshi lun [On the narrative modes of the Zuozhuan]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University Press.Google Scholar
- Pines, Y. (2002). Foundations of Confucian thought: Intellectual life in the Chunqiu period, 722–464 B.C.E. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
- Shan, Z. (2000). Zuozhuanxue lunji [Collected studies of Zuozhuan]. Taibei: Literature, History and Philosophy Press.Google Scholar
- Shen, Y., & Liu, N. (1992). Chunqiu zuozhuanxue shigao [Historical manuscript of the Chunqiu and Zuozhuan studies]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Ancient Books.Google Scholar
- Tong, Q. (2006). Zhongguo xushi wenxue de qidian yu kaipian—Zuozhuan xushi yishu lunlue [The real starting point of Chinese narrative literature—An account of the narrative art in Zuozhuan]. Beijing shifan daxue xuebao [Journal of Beijing Normal University], 197(5), 43–48.Google Scholar
- Tso, K. (2011). The Chinese classics, Vol. 5: The Ch’un Te’ew with The Tso Chuen (Liu Jiahe, et al. Eds. & Legge J. Trans.). Shanghai: East Normal University Press. [Rpt. From the 1960 Hong Kong version].Google Scholar
- Vankeerberghen, G. (2009). Review of The readability of the past in early Chinese historiography by Wai-yee Li. Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR), 31, 151–154.Google Scholar
- Vogelsang, K. (2011). From anecdote to history: Observations on the composition of the Zuozhuan. Oriens Extremus, 50, 99–124.Google Scholar
- Walsh, R. (2017). Fictionality as rhetoric. In Proceedings to the 6th international conference on narratology and the 8th national seminar on narratology in Shanghai, Oct. 20–22, 2017.Google Scholar
- Wang, J. C. Y. (1977). Early Chinese narrative: The Tso-chuan as example. In C. Birch, K. DeWoskin, E. Eoyang, P. Hanan, R. Hegel, Hsia C., et al. (Authors) & Plaks A. (Eds.), Chinese narrative: Critical and theoretical essays (pp. 3–20). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zv263.4 on June 20, 2017.
- Wang, J. C. Y. (2003). Zhongguo zaoqi xushixue yanjiu [Studies on early Chinese narratives]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books.Google Scholar
- Yu, A. C. (1988). History, fiction and the reading of Chinese narrative. Chinese Literature: Essays Articles Reviews (CLEAR), 10(1/2), 1–19.Google Scholar