Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 213–228 | Cite as

Fictionality as a rhetorical resource in Zuozhuan

  • Yuzhen Lin
Article

Abstract

Zuozhuan (Spring and autumn annals with Zuos commentary) initiated a narrative practice in Chinese historiography, which features not only records of historical events, but also various mysterious and unsubstantiated phenomena, such as divinations, omens, acts of mystical justice, apparitions and dreams. They played important roles for interpreting fictionality as a rhetorical resource in Zuozhuan. To elaborate fictionality and its competing relations with factuality, this paper subscribes to some Chinese scholars’ idea that it is from Zuozhuan on that fictionality endows Chinese historiography some “literary cover”, and analyzes those events in Zuozhuan. Moreover, enlightened by a rhetorical approach to fictionality proposed by Nielson, Phelan, and Walsh, this paper examines fictionality in Zuozhuan in terms of communicative intent, sender of fictionality, receivers of fictionality, and consequences on the logos and ethos. It argues that the communicative intent of Zuozhuan facilitates its compiler to utilize various means of fictionality so that the receivers conceive many interpretive assumptions, thus shedding much light to later generations in composing history.

Keywords

Fictionality Rhetorical approach to fictionality Zuozhuan 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant Number: 17ZDA281). And I want to express my most sincere gratitude for the instructive suggestions made by anonymous reviewers as well as Professor Shang Biwu.

References

  1. Blakeley, B. B. (1981). Notes on the reliability and objectivity of the Tu Yu commentary on the Tso chuan. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 101(2), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blakeley, B. B. (2004). “On the authenticity and nature of the Zuo Zhuan” revisited. Early China, 29, 217–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohn, D. (1990). Signposts of fictionality: A narratological perspective. Poetics Today, 11(4), 775–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawson, P. (2015). Ten theses against fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 74–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egan, R. C. (1977). Narratives in Tso Chuan. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 37(2), 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fang, X. (1934). Zuozhuan tonglun [A general introduction to the Zuozhuan]. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fu, X. (1999). Xianqin xushi yanjiu: Guanyu zhongguo xushi chuantong de xingcheng [Studies on the pre-Qin narration: On the formation of Chinese narrative tradition]. Beijing: The Oriental Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hatavara, M., & Mildorf, J. (2017). Hybrid fictionality and vicarious narrative experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kern, M. (2013). Zaoqi zhongguo wenxue: kaiduan zhi xihan [Early Chinese literature: From the beginning to West-Han dynasty] (Liu Qian Trans.). In Stephen Owen (Ed.), Jianqiao zhongguo wenxueshi: Shangjuan 1375 nianzhiqian [The Cambridge history of Chinese literature: Volumn 1, Before 1375] (Liu Qian et al. Trans.) (pp. 27–148). Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Legge, J. (2011). Prolegomena. In Tso K. (Ed.), The Chinese classics, Vol. 5: The Ch’un Te’ew with The Tso Chuen. (Liu Jiahe, et al. Eds., & Legge J. Trans.) (pp. 1–53). Shanghai: East Normal University Press. [Rpt. From the 1960 Hong Kong version].Google Scholar
  11. Li, W. (2007). The readability of the past in early Chinese historiography. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo, J. (2006). Wenhua he chuantong zai “zhongguo zaoqi xushiwen” zhong de mishi [Loss of culture and tradition in “Early Chinese narratives”—Criticism on C. Y. Wang’s studies on the Zuozhuan]. Zhongguo wenhua yanjiu [Studies of Chinese culture], 2, 152–161.Google Scholar
  13. Luo, J. (2007). Zouchu yigushidai de Zuozhuanxue yanjiu [The Zuozhuan studies stepping out of a skeptical era—Literature review to the past three decades]. Wenxue qianyan [Frontiers of literature], 1 , 253–274.Google Scholar
  14. Nielson, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R. (2015a). Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, 23(1), 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielson, H. S., Phelan, J., & Walsh, R. (2015b). Fictionality as rhetoric: A response to Paul Dawson. Narrative, 23(1), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pan, W. (2004). Zuozhuan xushi moshi lun [On the narrative modes of the Zuozhuan]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Phelan, J., & Nielson, H. S. (2017). Why there are no one-to-one correspondences among fictionality, narrative and techniques: A response to Mari Hatvara and Jarmila Mildorf. Narrative, 25(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pines, Y. (2002). Foundations of Confucian thought: Intellectual life in the Chunqiu period, 722464 B.C.E. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schaberg, D. (2001). A patterned past: Form and thought in early Chinese historiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shan, Z. (2000). Zuozhuanxue lunji [Collected studies of Zuozhuan]. Taibei: Literature, History and Philosophy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Shen, Y., & Liu, N. (1992). Chunqiu zuozhuanxue shigao [Historical manuscript of the Chunqiu and Zuozhuan studies]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Ancient Books.Google Scholar
  22. Tong, Q. (2006). Zhongguo xushi wenxue de qidian yu kaipian—Zuozhuan xushi yishu lunlue [The real starting point of Chinese narrative literature—An account of the narrative art in Zuozhuan]. Beijing shifan daxue xuebao [Journal of Beijing Normal University], 197(5), 43–48.Google Scholar
  23. Tso, K. (2011). The Chinese classics, Vol. 5: The Ch’un Te’ew with The Tso Chuen (Liu Jiahe, et al. Eds. & Legge J. Trans.). Shanghai: East Normal University Press. [Rpt. From the 1960 Hong Kong version].Google Scholar
  24. Vankeerberghen, G. (2009). Review of The readability of the past in early Chinese historiography by Wai-yee Li. Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR), 31, 151–154.Google Scholar
  25. Vogelsang, K. (2011). From anecdote to history: Observations on the composition of the Zuozhuan. Oriens Extremus, 50, 99–124.Google Scholar
  26. Walsh, R. (2017). Fictionality as rhetoric. In Proceedings to the 6th international conference on narratology and the 8th national seminar on narratology in Shanghai, Oct. 20–22, 2017.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, J. C. Y. (1977). Early Chinese narrative: The Tso-chuan as example. In C. Birch, K. DeWoskin, E. Eoyang, P. Hanan, R. Hegel, Hsia C., et al. (Authors) & Plaks A. (Eds.), Chinese narrative: Critical and theoretical essays (pp. 3–20). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zv263.4 on June 20, 2017.
  28. Wang, J. C. Y. (2003). Zhongguo zaoqi xushixue yanjiu [Studies on early Chinese narratives]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books.Google Scholar
  29. Yu, A. C. (1988). History, fiction and the reading of Chinese narrative. Chinese Literature: Essays Articles Reviews (CLEAR), 10(1/2), 1–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.English DepartmentShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations