, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 161–175 | Cite as

“Paradox lust”: the fortunate fall according to Joyce in finnegans wake

  • Gerald GillespieEmail author


A half century ago Atherton started cataloguing the plethora of books in the Wake, and fifteen years ago Hogan concentrated on Milton’s work among those furnishing more potent, complex, and extended allusions. Not since Rabelais’s, Cervantes’s, Sterne’s, and Goethe’s fictions, which demonstrated how to journey through vast realms of culture and paradigmatic literature, has any author acted with such sovereign freedom as Joyce to align a convergence of all books and language over the ages with his own search for wisdom. The fact that Joyce achieved a very personal synthesis out of the referential immensity adduced in the Wake should not deter us from recognizing certain deep patterns which qualify Joyce as a renewer of important tradition. The patterns of concern here as encountered in Joyce finally carry us over into experiencing a kind of “modern mysticism” that is not exclusively apophatic but also simultaneously directly affirmative, although not explainable in any routine discursive fashion. Joyce’s idea of a divine creative principle that appears to “fall” in the course of bringing forth its own purpose in a “creation” has an honorable place in theological, cosmogonic, and mystical thought in the European tradition. A number of Renaissance savants and poets believed that various paradigms embodied in ancient myth, including the biblical story of Adam and Eve, reflected this proposition. Several streams feeding from the Renaissance over Romanticism into Modernism and interesting to Joyce (e.g., early anthropological myth analysis, cabala, theosophy, etc.) kept alive the poetic vocabulary by which to express an encounter with the baffling puzzle of Being as a drama played out by the human race, an evolutionary drama with both historical and psychological dimensions. Joyce’s contemporary, Thomas Mann, while quite different in many respects, shares Joyce’s perception that a parallelism exists between the “fall” of Being or Spirit, the “agon” of human development, and the problem of a seemingly absurd mind/body division. Although keen interest in poets like Blake, the heroic power of the imagination, and the Luciferic theme is prominent in Ulysses, a movement occurs in the Wake away from the Bildungsroman structure toward a more encompassing visionary sense of rebirth. In the Wake Joyce “revises” the Miltonic version of the fall (as well as the Dantesque and others) in a way consonant with Goethe’s revision of the meaning of the recorded three millennia of human striving in Faust II; the Goethean coda anticipates Joyce in “fulfilling” the inner tendency which surfaces from the biblical account of the family romance onward and appears instantiated repeatedly in the world theater/history. Joyce’s version abandons the apocalyptic model of a once-only creation and privileges the alternate model of an eternal or permanent universe, but according to Joyce the repeatable story of the “fortunate fall” eventuates in a requisite salvational insight suited to the Viconian “eternal return”: in the words of the mother, “first we feel, then we fall”. Joyce reinvents the basic sacraments poetically to reflect the ultimate union of creator and creation, and the Wake’s famous coda confirms the sacred mission and destiny of love’s “body” (which is also by analogy the text’s body or embodiment).


Joyce Milton Goethe Genesis Androgyny 


  1. Atherton, J. K. (1974). The Books at the Wake: A Study of Literary Allusions in James Joyce’s “Finnegans Wake.” Expanded and corrected ed. Mamaroneck, N.Y.: Paul P. Appel.Google Scholar
  2. Balsamo, G. (2004). Joyce’s Messianism: Dante, negative existence, and the messianic self. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, D. (1992). Peninsular art: A context for a comparative study of Goethe and Joyce. Comparative Literature Studies, 29, 380–396.Google Scholar
  4. Begnal, M. H., & Senn, F. (Eds.). (1974). A conceptual guide to “Finnegans Wake”. University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beitchman, P. (1998). Alchemy of the word: Cabala of the renaissance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benstock, B. (1965). Joyce-again’s wake: An analysis of “Finnegans Wake”. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, J. (1986). Joyce’s book of the dark, “Finnegans Wake”. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bonheim, H. (1967). A lexicon of the German in “Finnegans Wake”. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, J. (1932). Goethe’s knowledge of english literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brivic, S. (1083). The mind factory: Kabbalah in Finnegans Wake. James Joyce Quarterly, 21, 7–30.Google Scholar
  11. Buxton, C. R. (1945). Prophets of heaven and hell: Virgil, Dante, Milton, Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, J., & Robinson, H. M. (1947). A skeleton key to “Finnegans Wake”. London: Faber & Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Cope, J. I. (1981). Joyce’s cities: Archeologies of the soul. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cumpiano, M. (1983). St John of the cross and the dark night of “Finnegans Wake”. Colchester, Essex: A Wake Newslitter Press.Google Scholar
  15. Drob, S. L. (2009). Kabbalah and postmodernism: A dialogue. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Ellmann, R. (1982). James Joyce. New and revised edition. New York, Oxford, Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Esslin, M. (1994). Romantic cosmic drama. In G. Gillespie (Ed.), Romantic drama (pp. 413–427). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Francke, D. (2007). The resurrection of being in the Ricorso of Finnegans Wake. James Joyce Quarterly, 45, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuchs, D. (2006). Joyce und Menippos: “A Portrait of the Artist as an Old Dog”. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  20. Gell-Mann, M. (1992). On complex adaptive systems. In: The Evolution of Human Languages: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution of Human Languages, Held August 1989 in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Edited by John A. Hawkins and Murray Gell-Mann. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Gillespie, G. (1994). Classic vision in the romantic age: Goethe’s reconstitution of European drama in Faust II. In: Romantic Drama. 379–397.Google Scholar
  22. Gillespie, G. (2006a). Nein oder Ja: Kabbalistische Züge in den Romanen von Kafka und Joyce. In Franz Kafka und die Weltliteratur (pp. 263–275). Hrsg. von Manfred Engel und Dieter Lamping. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  23. Gillespie, G. (2006b). Echoland: Readings from humanism to postmodernism. Bruxelles: Presses Interuniversitaires Européennes-Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Gillespie, G. (2009). Swallowing the androgyne and baptizing mother: Some modernist twists to two basic sacraments. The Comparatist, 33, 63–85.Google Scholar
  25. Gillespie, G. (2010). Afterthoughts of Hamlet: Goethe’s Wilhelm, Joyce’s Stephen. In: Proust, Mann, Joyce in the Modernist Context (pp. 167–184). 2nd, augmented ed. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  26. Glasheen, A. (1977). Third census of “Finnegans Wake”: An index of the characters and their roles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hart, C. (1963). A concordance to “Finnegans Wake”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hogan, P. C. (1995). Joyce, Milton, and the theory of influence. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  29. Joyce, J. (1976). Finnegans wake. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Kerrigan, W. (1998). Milton’s kisses. In S. B. Dobranski & J. P. Rumrich (Eds.), Milton and heresy (pp. 117–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McHugh, R. (2006). Annotations to “Finnegans Wake” (3rd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mommsen, K. (2010). “Kein Rettungsmittel als die Liebe”: Schillers und Goethes Bündnis im Spiegel ihrer Dichtungen. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Mommsen, K. (May 2008). ‘Als Meisterin erkennst du Scheherazaden’: Über Goethes Inspirationen aus 1001 Nacht zum zweiten Teil der Faust-Tragödie.
  34. Nuttall, A. D. (1998). The alternative trinity: Gnostic heresy in Marlowe, Milton, and Blake. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Paracelsus, T. B. (1960). In K. Goldhammer (Ed.), Vom Licht der Natur und des Geistes: Eine Auswahl. Stuttgart: P. Reclam.Google Scholar
  36. Rabaté, J.-M. (2001). James Joyce and the politics of egoism. Cambridge, UK, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teresa of Avila. (1995). The interior castle. London: Fount.Google Scholar
  38. Terrinoni, E. (2007). Occult Joyce: The hidden in “Ulysses”. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Underhill, E. (1974). Mysticism. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  40. Van Hulle, D. (2004). Textual awareness: A genetic study of late manuscripts by Joyce, Proust, and Mann. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. von Goethe, J. W. (1950). In E. Beutler (Ed.), Die Faustdichtungen: Urfaust; Faust ein Fragment; Faust, eine Tragödie; Paralipomena; Goethe über Faust. Zürich: Artemis-Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. von Goethe, J. W. (1976). In C. Hamlin (Ed.), Faust, a tragedy (W. Arndt, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  43. von Koppenfels, W. (2007). Der andere Blick oder das Vermächtnis des Mennipos: Paradoxe Perspektiven in der europäischen Literatur. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  44. Weninger, R. (2010). ‘A Great Poet on a Great Brother Poet’: A parallactic reading of Goethe and James Joyce. Publications of the English Goethe Society, 79(3), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilder, T., & Glasheen, A. (2004). In E. M. Burns & J. A. Gaylord (Eds.), A tour of the darkling plain: The “Finnegans Wake” letters of Thornton Wilder and Adaline Glasheen. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations