, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Prolegomena to the study of influence in African literature



Influence is a widespread and well-documented and widely acknowledged practice in the Western literary tradition, but there has been a flat denial that it exists among African writers. The very fact that a controversy should arise at all as to whether the readership of African writing lies within Africa itself says something about how a different standard is always applied when it comes to things African. Along with fame and fortune, the perception that one’s work could ignite the creative spark for others both in one’s immediate surroundings and afar continues to provide writers worldwide the incentive to keep honoring their calling, in part, because leaving a legacy of hope and inspiration is every writer’s dream. While common sense ought to suggest that the situation of Africa cannot be any different—after all, as a familiar African proverb has it, “it takes a village to raise a child”—the notion of artistic production as a communal affair has continued to be widely thought to be inapplicable to Africa. Why has it become convenient to argue that dialogue of an indigenous nature, as a mode of creative interaction and invention, is absent in contemporary African literature? To take up that question, our argument in this essay proceeds in three interlocking steps. First is an overview of the role professional readers, literary analysts, and scholars have ascribed to literary inheritance in the development of expressive power universally. Next is an attempt to adduce reasons for the persistent regime of denial that over time has established itself firmly in discussions of African writing concerning suggestions of a preoccupation, conceived expansively as disposition, style, thematic engagement, stance, and sensibility, which an informed observer might take as emanating from inspiration of a local origin. The final section makes the case that proper identification and recognition of the conventions of this indigenous literary source would unquestionably provide the best approach to understanding contemporary African literature and stimulating admiration for the creative temper involved in its writing as the case of contemporary African literature cannot be an exception.


African influence study Intertextuality in African literature 


  1. Achebe, C. (1975). Africa and her writers. In Morning yet on creation day (pp. 25–38). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  2. Armah, A. K. (1967). African socialism: Utopian or scientific? Presence Africaine, 64, 6–30.Google Scholar
  3. Armah, A. K. (1987). Battle for the mind of Africa. South (August), 62.Google Scholar
  4. Eliot, T. S. (1975). Tradition and the individual talent. In F. Kermode (Ed.), Selected prose of T. S. Eliot (pp. 37–44). London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler, A. (2006). How to write (p. 101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Griswold, W. (2000). Bearing witness: Readers writers, and the novel in Nigeria. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Highet, G. (1985). The classical tradition: Greek and Roman influences on western literature (p. 376). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Irele, A. (2001). The African imagination: Literature in Africa and the Diaspora (p. ix). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson Bate, W. (1970). The burden of the past and the English poet. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Julien, E. (1999). Visible woman; or, A semester among the great books, Profession 1999 (p. 229). New York: MLA.Google Scholar
  11. King, B. (1993). Those magical years: The making of Nigerian literature at Ibadan. Ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 24(4), 118–122.Google Scholar
  12. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony (p. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nazareth, P. (2002). The beautiful ones take a walk in the night. In T. Falola & B. Harlow (Eds.), African writers and their readers: Essays in honor of Bernth Lindfors (Vol. II, pp. 153–166). Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sellers, H. (2007). The practice of creative writing (p. 41). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  15. Soyinka, W. (1976). Myth literature, and the African world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Steiner, G. (2000). Grammars of creation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Vendler, H. (2003). Stevens and Keats’ ‘to autumn’. In: F. Lentricchia & A. Dubois (eds.), Close reading (p. 157). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Vickers, B. (1996). Shakespeare, co-author (p. 244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations