Neohelicon

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 53–62 | Cite as

The (meta)narrative paratext: coda as a cunning fictional device

Article

Abstract

Our study draws on the array of functions assigned to the textual Coda in Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement, also turned into a successful movie. It follows two diverging narrative discourses—the Text and its Paratext—that overtly compete over the understanding of the story and over its reading transaction. In McEwan’s novel, the closing Paratext provides genre patterns and alternative reading strategies to the Text. Turning back upon the story itself and upon its process of writing, its understanding and its genre expectations in a particular cultural context, Coda is being assigned by the British novelist an overt meta-narrative task.

Keywords

Transtextuality Coda (visual verbal meta-narrative) paratext Genre patterns Reading expectations Verisimilitude Story and discourse Narrative theory 

References

  1. Bal, M. (1985). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Translated by Christine van Boheemen).Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, W. (1968). The storyteller. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Iluminations. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  3. Booth, W. C. (1961). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Calinescu, M. (1993). Rereading. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Culler, J. (2001). Story and discourse. The pursuit of signs, semiotics, literature, deconstruction (pp. 169–188). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dallenbach, L. (1977). Le récit spéculaire. Essai sur la mise en abyme. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  7. Fagès, J. B. (1968). Le structuralisme en procès, Toulouse: Ed. Privat, pp 4–81.Google Scholar
  8. Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse, an essay in method. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests, literature in the second degree. (Stages). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gipsrud, J. (2002). Understanding media culture. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  11. Kermode, F. (1967). The sense of an ending: Studies in the theory of fiction. Oxford and New York, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, W. (1986). Recent theories of narrative. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. McEwan, I. (2007). Atonement. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. O’Neill, P. (1994). Fictions of discourse. Reading narrative. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ricoeur, P. (1985). Time and narrative (Vol. 2). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations