Neohelicon

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 33–51

Paratexts as Praxis

Article
  • 283 Downloads

Abstract

Our essay charts out the pedagogical, technological, operational, institutional, commercial, and theoretical implications of moving from a print-based casebook paradigm to an electronic course book model. Central to this venture is what we call the Conceptions Course Book (CCB), the law school course book of the future. That e-book is, as we discuss, the end product of an entirely new and sophisticated process of creating and distributing materials (textual, audio-visual, and interactive) to be used in law school courses. This process allows professors to develop (in an I-Tunes-like manner) their own custom-designed course books in efficient, economical, and innovative ways best suited to their pedagogical concerns. Unlike proposals for computer-based e-books, our CCB would be designed to take advantage of the unique opportunities offered by more advanced versions of e-readers such as Amazon’s Kindle, the Sony Reader, or Apple’s I-Pad.

Keywords

Education Casebook E-book Paratexts E-reader Pedagogical reform Conceptions Course Book Open-access material Christopher Columbus Langdell 

References

Books

  1. Alschuler, A. W. (2000). Law without values: The life, work, and legacy of Justice Holmes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hart, H. M., Jr., & Sacks, A. M. (2001). The legal process: Basic problems in the making and application of law (W. N. Eskridge, Jr. & P. P. Frickey, Eds.). New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  5. Horwitz, M. J. (1992). The transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The crisis of legal orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Leigh, A. (2009). The wikipedia revolution. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  7. Manz, W. H. (2005). The Palsgraf case: Courts, law, and society in 1920s New York. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  8. Marchand, P. (1980). Marshall McLuhan: The medium and the messenger. New York: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
  9. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Stuckey, R., et al. (2007). Best practices in legal education: A vision and a roadmap. Clinical Legal Education Association.Google Scholar
  11. Sullivan, W. M., et al. (2007). Educating lawyers: Preparation for the profession of law. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. White, G. E. (1993). Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the inner self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Casebooks

  1. Choper, J., et al. (2008). Leading cases in constitutional law. Eagen, MN: Thompson/West.Google Scholar
  2. Dorf, M. C. (Ed.). (2004). Constitutional law stories. Eagen, MN: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  3. Epstein, R. (2008). Cases & materials on torts (9th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Friedenthal, J., et al. (2005). Cases and materials on civil procedure (9th ed.). Eagen, MN: West.Google Scholar
  5. Garvey, J. H., et al. (2004). Modern constitutional theory: A reader (5th ed.).Google Scholar
  6. Gilmore, G. (1995). The death of contract (R. K. L. Collins, Ed.). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goldberg, V. (2007). Framing contract law: An economic perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Guthrie, W. K. C. (1967). A history of Greek philosophy. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kaplan, J., et al. (2008). Criminal law: Cases & materials (6th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Kionka, E. J. (1999). Torts in a nutshell (2nd ed.). Eagan, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Knapp, C., et al. (2007). Problems in contract law: Cases and materials (6th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Langdell, C. C. (1871). A selection of cases on the law of contracts: With references and citations. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  13. Oates, L., et al. (2006). The legal writing handbook: Analysis, Research, and Writing (4th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Redish, M. H., & Sherry, S. (2006). Federal courts: Cases, comments, and questions (6th ed.). New York: American Casebook Series.Google Scholar
  15. Schwartz, M. H., & Riebe, D. (2009). Contracts: A context and practice casebook. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Singer, J. (2006). Property law: Rules, policies, and practices (4th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Stark, T. L. (2007). Drafting contracts: How and why lawyers do what they do. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Stone, G., et al. (2005). Constitutional law (5th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Scholarly Articles

  1. Bodie, M. (2007). The future of the casebook: An argument for an open-source approach. Journal of Legal Education, 57, 10.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, R. K. L., & Skover, D. M. (1992). Paratexts. Stanford Law Review, 44, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eskridge, W. N., Jr., & Frickey, P. P. (1994). The making of The Legal Process. Harvard Law Review, 107, 2044.Google Scholar
  4. Hyman, J. D. (1976). Constitutional jurisprudence and the teaching of constitutional law. Stanford Law Review, 28, 1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1871). Book review. American Law Review, 6, 353.Google Scholar
  6. Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1899). The theory of legal interpretation. Harvard Law Review, 12, 17.Google Scholar
  8. Posner, R. A. (2002). The speech market and the legacy of Schenck. In L. C. Bollinger & G. R. Stone (Eds.), Eternally vigilant: Free speech in the modern era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Newspaper Articles

  1. Kantor, A. (2006). Electronic ink may rewrite Book Publishing Industry. USA Today, 24 February. Online version at http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-02-24-e-ink_x.htm.
  2. Lieberman, D. (2009). Newspaper closings raise fears about industry. USA Today, 18 March. Online version at http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-03-17-newspapers-downturn_N.htm.
  3. Rich, M. (2008). Literacy debate: Online, R. U. Really Reading? New York Times, 27 July.Google Scholar

Blog Entries

  1. Hodnicki, J. (8 January 2008). Professional reading: is open-source the future of eBook legal publishing? Law Librarian Blog. Google Scholar
  2. Hodnicki, J. (21 July 2008). Big screen kindle aiming for $5.5 billion textbook market. Law Librarian Blog.Google Scholar
  3. Koo, G. (20 December 2005). Kindle won’t catch fire in law schools. Law School Innovation/Law Professor Blogs Network. Google Scholar

Unpublished Memoranda

  1. Johnson, C. A. (2008). Memorandum on preliminary thoughts. Prepared for the Workshop on the Future of the Legal Course Book (on file with authors).Google Scholar
  2. Lustbader, P. (2008). Memorandum on preliminary thoughts. Prepared for the Workshop on the Future of the Legal Course Book (on file with authors).Google Scholar
  3. McCoy, B. (2008). Memorandum on preliminary thoughts. Prepared for the Workshop on the Future of the Legal Course Book (on file with authors).Google Scholar
  4. Silverman, G. M. (2008). Memorandum on preliminary thoughts. Prepared for the Workshop on the Future of the Legal Course Book (on file with authors).Google Scholar
  5. Vladeck, D. C. (2008). Memorandum on preliminary thoughts. Prepared for the Workshop on the Future of the Legal Course Book (on file with authors).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harold S. Shefelman ScholarUniversity of Washington School of LawSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Fredric C. Tausend Professor of LawSeattle University School of LawSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations