, 36:533 | Cite as

What (cyber)reading for the (cyber)classroom?

  • María Goicoechea de JorgeEmail author
  • Amelia Sanz


In the present paper, we take as a starting point the debate on the relationships between the changes in writing supports and the changes in reading rituals, defending the need to pluralize the models and functions of literary reading so as to be able to approach different typologies of literary digital texts. Firstly, after revising and situating in a historical context the different types of reading rituals that the print text has developed, we reflect upon the type of reading that the academia is implicitly demanding in this new context through its use of ICCT and the design of learning sites. Secondly, we discuss how our readers, the students, are adjusting to the new digital literature and how can the teacher guide them through this permanently morphing scenario. We argue about the need to develop functional models for digital literary readings, and in the final section of the paper, we offer several reading strategies that can help teachers and students build a bridge between print and digital literary texts.


Digital literature Learning Reading strategies ICCT Wreaders Digital texts 


  1. Abad, A. (1994). Minor measures. Retrieved March 21, 2009, from
  2. Abad, A. (1995). Sisyphus. Retrieved March 21, 2009, from
  3. Allusse, A. et al. (2006). ELLEN. Encyclopédies en ligne et lectures numériques [Electronic source]. Retrieved April 2009, from
  4. Baccino, T. (2004). La lecture électronique. Grenoble: Presses Universitaire de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  5. Barthes, R. (1980). The pleasure of the text (R. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York: Jeremy Tarcher.Google Scholar
  7. Bleich, D. (1986). Gender interests in reading and language. In E. A. Flynn & P. P. Schweickart (Eds.), Gender and reading: essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 234–266). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Borràs, L. (2005). Textualidades electrónicas. Nuevos escenarios para la literatura. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Les règles de l’art. Genèse et structure du champs littéraire. Google Scholar
  10. Cavallo, G., & Chartier, R. (1997). Histoire de la lecture dans le monde occidental. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. de Certeau, M. (1990). L’Invention du quotidien. Vol. 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  12. de Certeau, M. (1993). La culture au pluriel. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  13. Dery, M. (1996). Escape velocity: Cyberculture at the end of the century (pp. 1–18). New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eco, U. (2003). Vegetal and mineral memory: The future of books. In Bibliotheca alexandrina. Retrieved March 2009, from
  15. Elkins, J. (2003). Visual studies. A skeptical introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Febvre, L., & Martin, H.-J. (1958). L’apparition du livre. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  17. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  18. Flynn, E. (1986). Gender and reading. In E. A. Flynn & P. P. Schweickart (Eds.), Gender and reading: essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 267–289). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gache, B. (1999–2001). Book-Butterflies. Retrieved March 21, 2009, from
  20. García, D. (1999). Heartbeat. Retrieved March 21, 2009, from
  21. García Carcedo, P. (2008). Enseñanza virtual y presencal de las literaturas. Granada: Grupo Editorial Universitario.Google Scholar
  22. Gossin, P. (2004). Le manuel numérique. In Belisle, C. (dir.), La lecture numérique: réalités, enjeux et perspectives (pp. 223–254). Lyon: Presses de l’ENSSIB.Google Scholar
  23. Heim, M. (2001). The erotic ontology of cyberspace. In D. Trend (Ed.), Reading digital culture (pp. 70–86). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, S. (1995). Patchwork girl. CD-ROM. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems.Google Scholar
  25. Landow, G. P. (1994). “What’s a critic to do? Critical theory in the age of hypertext?” Hyper/Text/Theory (pp. 1–48). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. MacDowell, N. (2004). Interpreting communities: Private acts and public culture in early modern England. Criticism (Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 281–298). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  27. MacLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. Totonto: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, H.-J. (2000). La naissance du livre moderne (XIV–XVIIe siècles): mise en page et mise en texte du livre français. Paris: Cercle de Librairie.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, H.-J., & Chartier, R. (Eds.). (1982). Histoire de l’édition française. T. II, Le Livre triomphant. Paris: Promodis.Google Scholar
  30. Ministère de l’Education Nationale. (2009). Manuel scolaire numérique. Educnet (Online). Retrieved April 2009, from,
  31. Morin, E. (1999). L’intelligence de la complexité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  32. Morin, E. (2000). La mente bien ordenada. Repensar la reforma. Reformar el pensamiento. Barcelona: Seix Barral.Google Scholar
  33. O’Donnell, J. (1998). Avatars of the word: from Papyrus to Cyberspace. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ortiz, S. (2004). Diorama. Retrieved March 21 2009, from,
  35. Prensky, M. (1998). Twitch speed: Keeping up with young workers [Electronic source]. Retrieved April 2009, from,
  36. Prensky, M. (2001). On the horizon (Vol. 9). Lincoln: NCB University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Romero, D., & Sanz, A. (2007). Literatures in the digital era. Theory and praxis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rosado, E. & Belisle, C. (2007). Analysing digital literacy frameworks [Electronic source]. Retrieved April 2009, from,
  39. Saemmer, A. (2007). Matières textuelles sur support numérique. Saint Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne.Google Scholar
  40. Schwab, G. (1994). Subjects without selves. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scrivner, L. (2007). The echo of narcissism in interactive art and hypermedia. In D. Romero & A. Sanz (Eds.), Literatures in the digital era. Theory and praxis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Sturken, M., et al. (2004). Technological visions. The hopes and fears that shape new technologies. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ulmer, G. (2003). Internet invention. Literacy to Electracy. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  44. Vandendorpe, C. (1999). Du papyrus à l’hypertexte: essai sur les mutations du texte et de la lecture. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  45. Zandonella, C. (2006). Probing the Picasso Lobe. What Scientist are Learning; What Artists Know. Update. New York Academy of Sciences Magazine. March/April 6–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FilologÃa Inglesa II, Facultad de FilologÃaUniversidad ComplutenseMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Francés, Facultad de FilologíaUniversidad ComplutenseMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations