Neohelicon

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 157–169

The necropolis of love: James Joyce’s Dubliners

Speculum

Abstract

Joyce’s Dubliners (1916) embodies a harsh critique of the society in the Irish capital that is paralysed by Catholicism, by the English imperialism, by enormous poverty and social wretchedness. Love is under these circumstances degenerated and perverted, partly due to the Christian criminalization of sensual love, partly due to the egoistical and ruthless battle for survival of the individual in the capitalistic bourgeoisie. The repression of love, which is brought about through the miserable social conditions and the Christian persecution of sexuality, results in a degradation of love life, according to Joyce, that is clearly illustrated by the extensive prostitution in the streets, which the author perceives to be a direct consequence of the religious condemnation of erotic love. It is everyone for himself in this modern metropolis, so it is not only women who exercise mercantilist calculations in love life, since men utilise love in the exploitation of others as well (cf. ‘Two Gallants’). Joyce reveals furthermore how one of society’s most honoured institutions of love, matrimony, is nothing but state institutionalised prostitution that ties the married couple to life in mutual bitterness and unhappiness. The impossibility of love and the grim hopelessness of the socio-ideological conditions are in this manner mirroring each other in Dubliners.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Blok, Alexander. The Twelve and Other Poems. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, Richard. James Joyce and Sexuality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. Cixous, Hélene. The Exile of James Joyce. New York: David Lewis, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Dante, Alighieri. Vita Nuova (transl. Mark Musa). Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Ellmann, Richard. James Joyce. Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, Sigmund. Gesammelte Werke 15. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Heller, Vivian. Joyce, Decadence and Emancipation. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Henke, Suzette James Joyce and the Politics of Desire. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Herring, Phillip F. Joyce’s Uncertainty Principle. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. Joyce, James. The Critical Writings of James Joyce. New York: Viking Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Joyce, James. Dubliners. New York: Penguin Books, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. Joyce, James. Finnegans Wake. New York: Penguin Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Joyce, James. Joyce’s Scribbledehobble: The Ur-Workbook for Finnegans Wake (ed. Thomas E. Connolly). Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. Joyce, James. The Letters of James Joyce 1 (eds Richard Ellmann & Stuart Gilbert). London: Faber and Faber, 1957.Google Scholar
  15. Joyce, James. The Letters of James Joyce 2 (ed. Richard Ellmann). London: Faber and Faber, 1966.Google Scholar
  16. Joyce, James Ulysses (ed. Hans Walter Gabler). New York: Random House, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. Joyce, Stanislaus The Complete Dublin Diary of Stanislaus Joyce. Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Manganiallo, Dominic. Joyce’s Politics. London: Routledge, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Marx, Karl. Gesamtausgabe 1/2. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Marx, Karl. Werke 3 & 4. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, Mary T. Joyce and Dante: The Shaping Imagination. Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. Ronsard, Pierre de. Ouvres Completes 10 (ed. Paul Laumonier). Paris: Librairie E. Droz, 1939.Google Scholar
  23. Torchiana, Donald. Backgrounds for Joyce’s Dubliners. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Zola, Émile Fécondité. Paris: Bibliotheque-Charpentier, 1899.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Literature and SemioticsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations