Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 323–344 | Cite as

Twenty-year survivorship of tree seedlings in wind-created gaps in an upland hardwood forest in the eastern US

  • Erik C. BergEmail author
  • Stanley J. Zarnoch
  • W. Henry McNab
Article

Abstract

Wind is a common canopy disturbance in the upland oak (Quercus)- and hickory (Carya)-dominated stands of the Central Hardwood Region of the eastern US. Canopy openings range from small gaps, resulting from windthrow of single dominant trees, to occasional large gaps of many hectares formed by straight-line winds associated with severe thunderstorms and rare subtropical hurricanes. Vegetation regeneration response in small gaps and larger artificially created (i.e., timber harvested) gaps has been extensively studied, but little has been reported on naturally formed large gaps (> 6 trees) where a partial canopy typically remains from residual overstory and midstory trees. We investigated advance regeneration survivorship on a landscape scale within and around 12 large wind-felled gaps created by Hurricane Opal (October 1995) in a Southern Appalachian watershed. We hypothesized that survivorship would (1) change along a linear distance gradient from the unaffected forest towards gap center (2) vary in relation to categorical gap locations-within-gaps versus in the adjacent unaffected forest and (3) be affected by vegetation and environmental variables. In early 1996 we tagged tree seedlings in quadrats located along linear axes that extended from gap center into the unaffected forest and measured a variety of vegetation and environmental variables. Overall mean survivorship declined from 1997 (0.96) to 2016 (0.56). We found that survivorship was related to linear distance gradients for species rated intermediate in shade tolerance, such as red oaks, but not for shade intolerant, tolerant, and semi-tolerant species (e.g. white oaks). We found that survivorship increased on a linear distance gradient from gap center into the unaffected forest over the first 9 years of our investigation. By year 20 this relationship had reversed: survivorship increased from the unaffected forest to gap centers. Survivorship was also modeled as a function of categorical location of tagged seedlings within-gaps versus in the unaffected forest. Again, we found that survivorship of only intermediate shade tolerant species was related to categorical locations. Survivorship decreased in relation to time and cohort competition and increased with initial seedling height. Our 20-year investigation revealed changes in dynamics of regeneration that would not have been apparent in a short-term study. These results will enable resource managers to assess regeneration development in large gaps following windstorms in oak-dominated hardwood stands.

Keywords

Canopy gap Light gradient Moisture regime Regeneration Site quality survivorship Wind disturbance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Battenfeld, Virginia Gibbs, Dr. Curtis Hutto (deceased), Julia Kirschman, Carol Perry, Tracy Roof, and Keith Wood for long hours of field data collection and work with sensing instruments. We are grateful for collaboration with research colleague Dr. Catherine Greenberg who kindly assisted with data collection and allowed installation of sample plots in four gaps she had instrumented for other studies.

References

  1. Ashton MS (1995) Seedling growth of co-occurring Shorea species in the simulated light environments of a rain forest. For Ecol Manag 72:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes BV, Pregitzer KS, Spies TA, Spooner VH (1982) Ecological forest site classification. J For 80:493–498Google Scholar
  3. Beck DE (1988) Clearcutting and other regeneration options for upland hardwoods. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual hardwood symposium of the hardwood research council, pp 44–54Google Scholar
  4. Beckage B, Clark JS (2003) Seedling survival and growth of three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 84(7):1849–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckage B, Clark JS, Clinton BD, Haines BL (1999) A long-term study of tree seedling recruitment in southern Appalachian forests: the effects of canopy gaps and shrub understories. Can J For Res 30:1617–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beers TW, Dress P, Wensel L (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J For 64:691–692Google Scholar
  7. Berg EC (2002) Hurricane effects on forest understory vegetation in the Southern Appalachians. Ph.D. dissertation. Clemson University. Clemson, p 111Google Scholar
  8. Berg EC (2004) Survivorship and growth of oak regeneration in wind-created gaps. In: Spetich MA (ed) Upland oak ecology symposium: history, current conditions, and sustainability. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–73. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 311Google Scholar
  9. Booth MG, Hoeksema JD (2010) Mycorrrhizal networks counteract competitive effects of canopy trees on seedling survival. Ecology 91(8):2294–2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brose PH, Rebbeck J (2017) A comparison of the survival and development of the seedlings of four upland oak species grown in four different understory light environments. J For 115(3):159–166Google Scholar
  11. Brown N (1996) A gradient of seedling growth from the centre of a tropical rain forest canopy gap. For Ecol Manag 82:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckley DS, Sharik TL, Isebrands JG (1998) Regeneration of northern red oak: positive and negative effects of competitor removal. Ecology 79:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America, Vol. 2, hardwoods, agriculture handbook 654. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen J, Franklin JF, Spies TA (1995) Growing-season microclimatic gradients from clearcut edges into old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol Appl 5:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clinton BD, Baker CR (2000) Catastropic windthrow in the southern Appalachians: characteristics of pits and mounds and initial vegetation responses. For Ecol Manag 126:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clinton BD, Boring LR, Swank WT (1994) Regeneration patterns in canopy gaps of mixed-oak forests of the southern Appalachians: influences of topographic position and evergreen understory. Am Midl Nat 132(2):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coates KD, Burton PJ (1997) A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives. For Ecol Manag 99:337–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2000) Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol Monogr 70(2):171–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delta-T Devices Ltd. (1999) Program HEMIVIEW v. 2.1. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Dey DC, Parker WC (1997) Overstory density affects field performance of underplanted red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Ontario. N J Appl For 3:120–125Google Scholar
  22. Everham EM, Brokaw NVL (1996) Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot Rev 62(2):113–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finzi AC, Canham CD (2000) Sapling growth in response to light and nitrogen availability in a southern New England forest. For Ecol Manag 131:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottschalk KW (1985) Effects of shading on growth and development of northern red oak, black oak, black cherry, and red maple seedlings. I. height, diameter, and root/shoot ratio. In: Dawson JO, Majerus KA (eds) Proceedings of the central hardwood forest conference. V. Soc. of American Foresters Pub. 85-05, pp 189–185Google Scholar
  25. Gray AN, Spies TA (1996) Gap size, within-gap position and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. J Ecol 84:2458–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenberg CH, McNab WH (1998) Forest disturbance in hurricane-related downbursts in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina. For Ecol Manag 104:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hibbs DE (1982) Gap dynamics in a hemlock-hardwood forest. Can J For Res 12(3):522–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmgren M, Scheffer M, Huston MA (1997) The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 78(7):1966–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson PS, Shifley SR, Rogers R (2009) The ecology and silviculture of oaks. CABI Publishing, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kathke S, Bruelheide H (2010) Interaction of gap age and microsite type for the regeneration of Picea abies. For Ecol Manag 259:1597–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (1979) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, New York, p 811Google Scholar
  32. Kubota Y (2000) Spatial dynamics of regeneration in a conifer/broad-leaved forest in northern Japan. J Veg Sci 11(5):633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lhotka JM, Loewenstein EF (2009) Effect of midstory removal on understory light availability and the 2-year response of underplanted cherrybark oak seedlings. N J Appl For 33(4):171–177Google Scholar
  34. Loftis DL (1989) Regeneration of southern hardwoods: some ecological concepts. In: Proceedings of the national silviculture workshop. USDA Forest Service Timber Management Staff 139-143Google Scholar
  35. Loftis DL (1990) A shelterwood method for regerating red oak in the Southern Appalachians. For Sci 36:917–929Google Scholar
  36. Loftis DL (1995) Personal communication: white oak shade tolerance and survivorship trendsGoogle Scholar
  37. Loftis DL (2004) Upland oak regeneration and management. In: Spetich MA (ed) Upland oak ecology symposium: history, current conditions and sustainability. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-73. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, pp 163–167Google Scholar
  38. Madsen P, Larsen JB (1997) Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content. For Ecol Manag 97:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McNab WH (1989) Terrain shape index: quantifying effect of minor landforms on tree height. For Sci 35(1):91–104Google Scholar
  40. McNab WH (1993) A topographic index to quantify the effect of mesoscale landform on site productivity. Can J For Res 23(6):1100–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McNab WH, Greenberg CH, Berg EC (2004) Landscape distribution and characteristics of large hurricane-related canopy gaps in a southern Appalachian watershed. For Ecol Manag 196:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meiners SJ, Handel SN, Pickett ST (2000) Tree seedling establishment under insect herbivory: edge effects and inter-annual variation. Plant Ecol 151(151):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell SJ (2013) Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. Forestry 86:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morrissey RC, Jacobs DF, Davis AS, Rathfon RA (2010) Survival and competitiveness of Quercus rubra regeneration associated with planting stocktype and harvest opening intensity. New For 40:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Motsinger JR, Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Henderson DE, Zenner EK (2010) Effect of midstory and understory removal on the establishment and development of natural and artificial pin oak advance reproduction in bottomland forests. New For 39(2):195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noble IR, Slatyer RO (1980) The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43(1–2):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Osborne JW (2015) Best practices in logistic regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Puerta-Piñero C, Gomez JM, Valladares F (2007) Irradiance and oak seedling survival and growth in a heterogeneous environment. For Ecol Manag 242:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Runkle JR (1985) Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett SA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, pp 17–33Google Scholar
  50. Runkle JR (1992) Guidelines and sample protocol for sampling forest gaps. GTR-283. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research StationGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanchez-Gomez D, Zavala MA, Valladares F (2006) Seedling survival responses to irradiance are differentially influenced by low-water availability in four tree species of the Iberian cool temperate-Mediterranean ecotone Acta. Oecologia 30:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. SAS (2013) The statistical analysis system, version 9.4. CaryGoogle Scholar
  53. Schweitzer CJ, Dey DC (2017) Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Knapp BO, Larsen DR, Shifley SR, Stelzer HE (eds) Proceedings of the 20th central hardwood forest conference; 2016 March 28–April 1; Columbia, MO. General Technical Report NRS-P-167. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 87–98Google Scholar
  54. Shure DJ, Phillips DL, Bostick PE (2006) Gap size and succession in cutover southern Appalachian forests: an 18 year study of vegetation dynamics. Plant Ecol 185:299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sipe TW, Bazzaz FA (1995) Gap partitioning among maples (Acer) in central New England: survival and growth. Ecol 76:1587–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swank WT, Vose JM (1988) Effects of cutting practices on microenvironment in relation to hardwood regeneration. In: Proceedings of the guidelines for regenerating appalachian hardwood stands. SAF Publication 88-03, pp 71–88Google Scholar
  57. Taylor AR, MacLean DA, McPhee D, Dracup E, Keys K (2017) Salvaging has minimal impacts on vegetation regeneration 10 years after severe windthrow. For Ecol Manag 406:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teste FP, Simard SW, Durall DM, Guy RD, Jones MD, Schoonmaker AL (2009) Access to mycorrhizal networks and roots of trees: importance for seedling survival and resource transfer. Ecology 90(10):2808–2822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Der Meer PJ, Dignan P, Saveneh AG (1999) Effect of gap size on seedling establishment, growth and survival at three years in mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell.) forest in Victoria, Australia. For Ecol Manag 117(1–3):33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vodde F, Jogiste K, Engelhart J, Frelich LE, Moser WK, Sims A, Metslaid M (2015) Impact of wind-induced microsites and disturbance severity on tree regeneration patterns: results from the first post-storm decade. For Ecol Manag 348:174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yetter TC, Runkle JR (1986) Height growth rates of canopy tree species in Southern Appalachian gaps. Castanea 51(3):157–167Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik C. Berg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stanley J. Zarnoch
    • 2
  • W. Henry McNab
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Montana, Bureau of Business and Economic ResearchMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Research StationAshevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations