New Forests

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 643–662 | Cite as

Natural or assisted succession as approach of forest recovery on abandoned lands with different land use history in the Andes of Southern Ecuador

  • Ximena PalomequeEmail author
  • Sven Günter
  • David Siddons
  • Patrick Hildebrandt
  • Bernd Stimm
  • Nikolay Aguirre
  • Ruth Arias
  • Michael Weber


Forest recovery on disturbed areas is of special significance in the Ecuadorian Andes, where deforestation is a serious problem. Natural diachronic succession was evaluated on three large plots or sites, differing in their land use and vegetation composition, one is dominated by grass species on an abandoned pasture (Pasture site), the other two are post-fire vegetation dominated by bracken (Bracken site) and various shrubs (Shrub site). Additionally, we assessed the effectiveness of manual removal of competitive herbaceous species to accelerate forest recovery. Monitoring was done in 2003, 2005 and 2007 on 48 subplots of 116 m2 each recording species richness and woody-species density. Results showed that the Pasture site demonstrated a competitive effect of exotic grasses on woody species recruitment with much lower species recruitment and density, suggesting serious inhibition of natural forest regeneration and an unclear successional trajectory. The Bracken and Shrub sites became significantly similar floristically and there is evidence for a marked facilitation of woody plant recruitment correlated with light availability on the ground. Both sites showed characteristics of classic succession, with Shrub showing a higher species richness and density while late-successional species are poorly represented on the Bracken site. However, NMDS ordination using species density showed that the two trajectories may not be converging towards a common “final state”. Manual weeding was ineffective for accelerating forest recovery. These results suggest that the main limiting factor for the recruitment of woody species on the Pasture site is strong grass competition and must be addressed before seed availability, while seed availability seems to be the constraining factor for Bracken and Shrub site development, thus direct seeding or planting may be effective in accelerating forest recovery.


Andes region Abandoned lands Restoration Mechanical treatment Successional trajectory 



We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 402, FOR 816 and PAK 824) for financial support, the Ministerio del Ambiente for research permits, and Nature and Culture International for logistical support. We are very grateful to Patricio Sagbay and Byron Medina for their field assistance during the first observation periods.


  1. Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Herrera L, Rosario M, Serrano M (1995) Forest recovery in abandoned tropical pastures in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 77:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker JP, Olff H, Willems JH, Zobel M (1996) Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long term vegetation dynamics? J Veg Sci 7:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker M, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck E, Harting K, Roos K (2008a) Forest clearing by slash and burn. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical mountain ecosystem of Ecuador: ecological studies, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, pp 387–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I et al (2008b) The ecosystem (Reserva Biológica San Francisco). In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical mountain ecosystem of Ecuador: Ecological Studies, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendix J, Homeier J, Cueva EO, Emck P, Breckle SW, Richter M, Beck E (2006) Seasonality of weather and tree phenology in a tropical evergreen mountain rain forest. Int J Biometeorol 50:370–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation : a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capers RS, Chazdon RL, Brenes AR, Alvarado BV (2005) Successional dynamics of woody seedling communities in wet tropical secondary forests. J Ecol 93:1071–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Celis G, Jose S (2011) Restoring abandoned pasture land with native tree species in Costa Rica: effects of exotic grass competition and light. For Ecol Manage 261:1598–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ (2006) Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples. Biometrics 62:361–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chinea JD (2002) Tropical forest succession on abandoned farms in the Humacao municipality of eastern Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 167:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colwell, R. K. (2009) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2. User’s Guide and application.
  13. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organisation. Am Nat 111:1119–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davy AJ (2002) Establishment and manipulation of plant population and communities in terrestrial systems. In: Perrow MR, Davy AJ (eds) Handbook of ecological restoration. Principles of restoration, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–241Google Scholar
  15. De Zaldívar VBS (2008) From agrarian reform to ethnodevelopment in the highlands of Ecuador. J Agrar Chang 8:583–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ding Y, Zang R, Letcher SG, Liu W, Lu X (2016) Aboveground and belowground competition affect seedling perfromance and allometry in a tropical monsoon forest. New For 47:529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dislich C, Günter S, Homeier J, Schröder B, Huth A (2009) Simulating forest dynamics of a tropical montane forest in South Ecuador. Erdkunde 63:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doust SJ, Erskine PD, Lamb D (2008) Restoring rainforest species by direct seeding: tree seedling establishment and growth performance on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. For Ecol Manage 256:1178–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douterlungne D, Levy-Tacher SI, Golicher DJ, Dañobeytia FR (2008) Applying indigenous knowledge to the restoration of degraded tropical rain forest clearings dominated by bracken fern. Restor Ecol 18:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  21. Engel VL, Parrotta JA (2001) An evaluation of direct seeding for reforestation of degraded lands in central Sao Paulo state, Brazil. For Ecol Manage 152:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallegos SC, Hense I, Saavedra F, Schleuning M (2015) Bracken fern facilitates tree seedling recruitment in tropical fire-degraded habitats. For Ecol Manage 337:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallegos SC, Beck SG, Hensen I, Saavedra F, Lippok D, Schleuning M (2016) Factotrs limiting montane forest regeneration in bracken -dominated habitats in the tropics. For Ecol Manage 381:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gliessman SR, Muller CH (1978) The allelopathic mechanisms of dominance in bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) in Southern California. J Chem Ecol 4:337–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Castro J, Hódar J (2008) Facilitation of tree saplings by nurse plants: Microhabitat amelioration or protection against herbivores? J Veg Sci 19:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2009) Ecosim: null models software for ecology. In: Version 7. Accessed 10 Jan 2010
  27. Göttlicher D, Obregón A, Homeier J, Rollenbeck R, Nauss T, Bendix J (2009) Landcover classification in the Andes of Southern Ecuador using Landsat ETM + data as a basis for SVAT modelling. Int J Remote Sens 30:1867–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griscom HP, Griscom BW, Ashton MS (2009) Forest regeneration from pasture in the dry tropics of Panama: effects of cattle, exotic grass, and forested riparia. Restor Ecol 17:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. For Ecol Manage 148:185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Günter S, Weber M, Erreis R, Aguirre N (2007) Influence of distance to forest edges on natural regeneration of abandoned pastures: a case study in the tropical mountain rain forest of Southern Ecuador. Eur J For Res 126:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Günter S, Gonzalez P, Álvarez G, Aguirre N, Palomeque X, Haubrich F, Weber M (2009) Determinants for successful reforestation of abandoned pastures in the Andes: soil conditions and vegetation cover. For Ecol Manage 258:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey BJ, Holzman BA (2014) Divergent successional pathways of stand development following fire in a California closed-cone pine forest. J Veg Sci 25:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holl KD (1998a) Effects of above- and below-ground competition of shrubs and grass on Calophyllum brasiliense (Camb.) seedling growth in abandoned tropical pasture. For Ecol Manage 109:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holl KD (1998b) Do perching bird structures elevate seed rain and seedling establishment in abandoned pasture? Restor Ecol 6:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holl KD (2002) Effect of shrubs on tree seedling establishment in an abandoned tropical pasture. J Ecol 90:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holl K, Loik M, Lin E, Samuels I (2000) Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restor Ecol 8:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Homeier J, Werner FA (2007) Spermatophyta. Checklist of the Reserva Biológica San Francisco (Prov. Zamora-Chinchipe, S-Ecuador). Ecotropical Monogr 4:15–58Google Scholar
  38. Hooper ER, Condit R, Legendre P (2002) Responses of 20 native tree species to reforestation strategies for abandoned farmland in Panama. Ecol Appl 12:1626–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hooper E, Legendre P, Condit R (2005) Barriers to forest regeneration of deforested and abandoned land in Panama. J Appl Ecol 42:1165–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jørgensen PM, León-Yánez S (1999) Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador, Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Bot Gard 75:1–7, 1–1182Google Scholar
  41. Klanderud K, Mbolatiana HZH, Vololomboahangy MN, Radimbison MA, Roger E, Totland Ø, Rajeriarison C (2010) Recovery of plant species richness and composition after slash-and-burn agriculture in a tropical rainforest in Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 19:187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knoke T, Bendix J, Pohle P, Hamer U, Hildebrandt P, Roos K, Gerique A, Sandoval ML, Breuer L, Tischer A, Silva B, Calvas B, Aguirre N, Castro LM, Windhorst D, Weber M, Stimm B, Günter S, Palomeque X, Mora J, Mosandl R, Beck E (2014) Afforestation or intense pasturing improve the ecological and economic value of abandoned tropical farmlands. Nat Commun 5:5612CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Li-Cor I (1992) Plant canopy analyzer, operating manual. LI-COR Inc., LincolnGoogle Scholar
  44. Marrs RH, Le Duc MG, Mitchell RJ, Goddard D, Paterson S, Pakeman RJ (2000) The ecology of bracken: its role in succession and implications for control. Ann Bot 85:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Softwa, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  46. McDonald MA, Healey JR (2000) Nutrient cycling in secondary forests in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica. For Ecol Manage 139:257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muthukumar T, Sha L, Yang XD, Cao M, Tang JW, Zheng Z (2003) Distribution of roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in tropical forest types of Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Appl Soil Ecol 22:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newton AC, Cantarello E (2015) Restoration of forest resilience: An achievable goal? New For 46:645–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niemann H, Behling H (2008) Past vegetation and fire dynamics. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical mountain ecosystem of Ecuador: ecological studies, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ortega-Pieck A, López-Barrera F, Ramírez-Marcial N, García-Franco JG (2011) Early seedling establishment of two tropical montane cloud forest tree species: the role of native and exotic grasses. For Ecol Manage 261:1336–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pascarella JB, Aide TM, Serrano MI, Zimmerman JK (2000) Land-use history and forest regeneration in the Cayey Mountains, Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 3:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearsall D (1992) The Origins of plant cultivation in South America. In: Cowan C, Watson PJ (eds) In the origins of agriculture: an international perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washignton D.C., pp 173–205Google Scholar
  53. Rey Benayas JM, Martínez-Baroja L, Pérez-Camacho L, Villar-Salvador P, Holl KD (2015) Predation and aridity slow down the spread of 21-year-old planted. New For 46:841–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rhoades CC, Eckert GE, Coleman DC (1998) Effect of pasture trees on soil nitrogen and organic matter: implications for tropical montane forest restoration. Restor Ecol 6:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roos K, Rödel HG, Beck E (2011) Short- and long-term effects of weed control on pastures infested with Pteridium arachnoideum and an attempt to regenerate abandoned pastures in South Ecuador. Weed Res 51:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sampaio AB, Holl KD, Scariot A (2007) Does restoration enhance regeneration of seasonal deciduous forests in pastures in Central Brazil? Restor Ecol 15:462–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sarmiento FO (1997) Landscape regeneration by seeds and successional pathways to restore fragile Tropandean Slopelands. Mt Res Dev 17:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schröder A, Persson L, De Roos AM (2005) Direct experimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos 110:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sierra R (2013) Patrones y factores de deforestación en el Ecuador continental, 1990–2010. Y un acercamiento a los próximos 10 años. Conservación Internacional Ecuador and Forest Trends. Quito, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  60. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Verdú M, Rey PJ, Alcántara JM, Siles G, Valiente-Banuet A (2009) Phylogenetic signatures of facilitation and competition in successional communities. J Ecol 97:1171–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vieira ICG, Uhl C, Nepstad D (1994) The role of the shrub Cordia multispicata Cham as a “succession facilitator” in an abandoned pasture, Paragominas. Amazon Veg 115:91–99Google Scholar
  64. Weber M, Günter S, Aguirre N, Stimm B, Mosandl R (2008) Reforestation of abandoned pastures: silvicultural Means to accelerate forest recovery and biodiversity. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical mountain ecosystem of Ecuador-ecological studies, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, pp 447–458Google Scholar
  65. Wijdeven SMJ, Kuzee ME (2000) Seed availability as a limiting factor in forest recovery processes in Costa Rica. Restor Ecol 8:414–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilcke W, Yasin S, Schmitt A, Valarezo C, Zech W (2008) Soil along the altitudinal transect and in catchments. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical mountain ecosystem of Ecuador-ecological studies, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, pp 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams-Linera G, Bonilla-Moheno M, López-Barrera F (2016) Tropical cloud forest recovery: the role of seed banks in pastures dominated by an exotic grass. New For 47:481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wishnie MH, Dent DH, Mariscal E, Deago J, Cedeño N, Ibarra D, Condit R, Ashton PMS (2007) Initial performance and reforestation potential of 24 tropical tree species planted across a precipitation gradient in the Republic of Panama. For Ecol Manage 243:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ximena Palomeque
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sven Günter
    • 2
    • 3
  • David Siddons
    • 4
  • Patrick Hildebrandt
    • 2
  • Bernd Stimm
    • 2
  • Nikolay Aguirre
    • 5
  • Ruth Arias
    • 4
  • Michael Weber
    • 2
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Departamento de Recursos Hídricos y Ciencias AmbientalesUniversidad de CuencaCuencaEcuador
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Institute of Silviculture, Center of Life and Food Sciences WeihenstephanTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  3. 3.Thünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest EconomicsHamburgGermany
  4. 4.Escuela de Biología, Ecología y GestiónUniversidad del AzuayCuencaEcuador
  5. 5.Programa de Investigaciones en BiodiversidadUniversidad Nacional de LojaLojaEcuador

Personalised recommendations