New Forests

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 63–90 | Cite as

Time series analysis of forest carbon dynamics: recovery of Pinus palustris physiology following a prescribed fire

  • G. StarrEmail author
  • C. L. Staudhammer
  • H. W. Loescher
  • R. Mitchell
  • A. Whelan
  • J. K. Hiers
  • J. J. O’Brien


Frequency and intensity of fire determines the structure and regulates the function of savanna ecosystems worldwide, yet our understanding of prescribed fire impacts on carbon in these systems is rudimentary. We combined eddy covariance (EC) techniques and fuel consumption plots to examine the short-term response of longleaf pine forest carbon dynamics to one prescribed fire at the ends of an edaphic gradient (mesic and xeric sites). We also introduce novel (to the EC research community) statistical time-series approaches to quantify the drivers of carbon dynamics in these systems. We determined that our mesic site was a moderate sink of carbon (−157.7 ± 25.1 g C m−2 year−1), while the xeric site was carbon neutral (5.9 ± 32.8 g C m−2 year−1) during the study. The fire released 408 and 153 g C m−2 year−1 for the mesic and xeric sites, respectively. When loss associated with fire was combined with net ecosystem exchange rates, both sites became moderate carbon sources for the year. Analyses of assimilation and respiration parameters (e.g., maximum photosynthesis, quantum efficiency, and daytime ecosystem respiration) showed a positive trend over time pre-fire and a negative trend over time post-fire for maximum ecosystem CO2 uptake rates, and the opposite relationship for daytime ecosystem respiration rates. Within 30 days following fire, ecosystem physiological activity was statistically similar to pre-fire and appeared to be driven by the pine canopy. Our results suggest that prescribed fire (low intensity, high frequency) maintains the existing structure and function (in this case, carbon flux rates) because longleaf pine ecosystems have evolved with fire. This study, 1 year in length, provides a foundational understanding of the complex interaction between fire and carbon dynamics for longleaf pine ecosystems. Moreover, it provides a case study for applying time series analysis methods to EC data where there are complex relationships between ecosystem physiological activity and environmental drivers. However, to elicit a broader understanding of the complex interaction occurring between fire and carbon dynamics long- term studies are needed.


Longleaf pine Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) Ecosystem respiration (Reco) Gross ecosystem exchange (GEE) Prescribed fire ARIMA models 



This research has been funded by U. Alabama and the Joseph Jones Ecological Research Center (JJERC). Authors also wish to acknowledge the superlative logistical support of the JJERC, especially J Bradley, B Shelton, and M Mazzacavaallo. HW Loescher acknowledges the National Science Foundation (DBI-0752017). We would also like to thank the two previous reviewers who helped increase the clarity of this manuscript through their suggestion on an early version of this paper. This paper would not have taken shape if it were not the guidance, lifetime work, and for many a conversation with J. Franklin.


  1. Abrahamson WG, Hartnett DC (1990) Pine flatwoods and dry prairies. In: Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) Ecosystems of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp 103–148Google Scholar
  2. Addington RN, Donavan LA, Mitchell RJ, Vose JM, Pecot SD, Jack SB, Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Oren R (2006) Adjustments in hydraulic architecture of Pinus palustris maintain similar stomatal conductance in xeric and mesic habitats. Plant Cell Environ 29:535–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amiro BD, MacPherson JI, Desjardins RL, Chen JM, Liu J (2003) Post-fire carbon dioxide fluxes in the western Canadian boreal forest: evidence from towers, aircraft and remote sensing. Agric Forest Meteorol. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031
  4. Amiro BD, Orchansky AL, Barr AG, Black TA, Chambers SD, Chapin FS III, Goulden ML, Litvak M, Liu HP, McCaughey JH, McMillan A, Randerson JT (2006) The effect of post-fire stand age on the boreal forest energy balance. Agric Forest Meteorol 140:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubrey DP, Mortazavi B, O’Brien JJ, McGee JD, Hendricks JJ, Kuehn KA, Teskey RO, Mitchell RJ (2012) Influence of repeated canopy scorching on soil CO2 efflux. Forest Ecol Manag 282:142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balshi MS, McGuire AD, Duffy P, Flannigan M, Kicklighter DW, Melillo J (2009) Vulnerability of carbon storage in North American boreal forests to wildfires during the 21st century. Global Change Biol 15(6):1491–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beringer J, Hutley LB, Tapper NJ, Cernusak LA (2007) Savanna fires and their impact on net ecosystem productivity in North Australia. Global Change Biol 13:990–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond WJ, Woodward FI, Midgley GF (2005) The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without Fire. New Phytol 165:525–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bond-Lamberty B, Peckham SD, Ahl DE, Gower ST (2007) Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. Nature 450:89–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Box GEP, Gwilym M, Jenkins G, Reinsel C (1994) Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Brocklebank JC, Dickey A (2003) SAS for forecasting time series, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR (2003) Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/LuheGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapin III FS, Folke C, Kofinas GP (2009) A framework for understanding change. In: Chapin III FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  14. Christensen NL (1981) Fire regimes in Southeastern ecosystems. In: Mooney HA, Bonnicksen TM, Christensen NL, Lotan JE, Reiners WA (eds) Fire regimes and ecosystem properties. USDA, Washington, DC. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-WO-26. pp 112–136Google Scholar
  15. DC NC (2002) Monthly station normals of temperature, precipitation and heating and cooling degree-days 1971–2000. National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NCGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foken T, Leclerc MY (2004) Methods and limitations in validation of footprint models. Agric Forest Meteorol 127(3–4):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ford CR, Mitchell RJ, Teskey RO (2008) Water table depth affects productivity, water use, and the response to nitrogen addition in a savanna system. Can J Forest Res 38:2118–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Girod CM, Hurtt GC, Frolking S, Aber JD, King AW (2007) The tension between fire risk and carbon storage: evaluating US carbon and fire management strategies through ecosystem models. Earth Interact 11:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glitzenstein JS, Platt WJ, Streng DR (1995) Effects of fire regime and habitat on tree dynamics in north Florida longleaf pine savannas. Ecol Monogr 65(4):441–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glitzenstein JS, Streng DR, Masters RE, Robertson KM, Herman SM (2012) Fire-frequency effects on vegetation in north Florida pinelands: another look at the long-term Stoddard fire research plots at tall timbers research station. Forest Ecol Manag 264:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gnauck A, Lee BL, Feugo JDL, Luther B (2010) The role of statistics for long term ecological research. In: Müller F, Baessler C, Schubert H, Klotz S (eds) Long term ecological research: between theory and practice. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Goebel PC, Palik BJ, Kirkman LK, Drew MB, West L et al (2001) Forest ecosystems of a Lower Gulf Coastal Plain landscape: multifactor classification and analysis. J Torrey Bot Soc 128:47–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grace J, San Jose J, Meir P, Miranda HS, Montes RA (2006) Productivity and carbon fluxes of tropical savannas. J Biogeogr 33:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harden JW, Trumbore SE, Stocks BJ, Hirsch A, Gower ST, O’Neill KP, Kasischke ES (2000) The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget. Global Change Biol 6:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Working Group II contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Jarvis P, Rey A, Petsikos C, Wingate L, Rayment M, Pereira J, Banaza J, David J, Miglietta F, Borghetti M, Manca G, Valentini R (2007) Drying and wetting of Mediterranean soils stimulates decomposition and carbon dioxide emission: the “Birch effect”. Tree Physiol 27:929–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkman LK, Goebel PC, Palik BJ, West LT (2004) Predicting plant species diversity in a longleaf pine landscape. EcoScience 11:80–93Google Scholar
  29. Kruger FJ (1983) Plant community diversity and dynamics in relation to fire. Ecological studies. In: Kruger FJ, Mitchell DT, Jarvis JUM (eds) Mediterranean-type ecosystems: the role of nutrients. Springer, New York, pp 446–472Google Scholar
  30. Kühne A, Schack-Kichner H, Hildebrand EE (2012) Gas diffusivity in soils compared to ideal isotropic porous media. J Plant Nutr Sci 175:34–45. doi: 10.1002/jpin.201000438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lavoie M, Starr G, Mack MC, Martin TA, Gholz HL (2010) Impact of prescribed fire on understory biomass production and nutrient availability in a naturally-regenerated longleaf pine-slash pine forest in north central Florida. Nat Areas J 30(1):82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Litvak ME, Miller S, Wofsy SC, Goulden ML (2003) Effect of stand age on whole ecosystem CO2 exchange. J Geophy Res 108(D3):8225. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000854. Special section: comparison of carbon exchange between Boreal Black Spruce Forests and the atmosphere for a wildfire age sequence (FIRE-EXB)
  33. Lloyd J, Taylor JA (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol 8:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loescher HW, Munger JW (2006) Preface to special section on new approaches to quantifying exchanges of carbon and energy across a range of scales. J Geophys Res Atmos 111:D14S91. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007135
  35. Loescher HW, Law BE, Mahrt L, Hollinger DY, Campbell J, Wofsy SC (2006a). Uncertainties in, and interpretation of, carbon flux estimates using the eddy covariance technique. J Geophys Res Atmos 111:D21S90. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006932
  36. Loescher HW, Starr G, Martin TA, Binford M, Gholz HL (2006b) The effect of daytime circulations on eddy covariance carbon dioxide flux measurements over a Pinus elliottii canopy. J Appl Meteorol Clim 45:1127–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin PH, Nabuurs GJ, Aubinet M, Karjalainen T, Vine EL, Kinsman J, Heath L (2001) Carbon sinks in temperate forests. Annu Rev Energ Environ 26:435–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Massman WJ (2000) A simple method for estimating frequency response corrections for eddy covariance systems. Agric Forest Meteorol 104:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Massman WJ (2004) Toward an ozone standard to protect vegetation based on effective dose: a review of deposition resistances and a possible metric. Atm Environ 38(15):2323–2337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitchell RJ, Kirkman LK, Pecot SD, Wilson CA, Palik BJ, Boring LR (1999) Patterns and controls of ecosystem function in longleaf pine-wiregrass savannas: I. aboveground net primary productivity. Can J Forest Res 29:743–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitchell RJ, Hiers JK, O’Brien JJ, Starr G (2009) Ecological forestry in the Southeast: understanding the ecology of fuels. J For 107(8):391–397Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell RJ, Liu Y, O’Brien JJ, Elliott KJ, G Starr, Maniat CF, Hiers JK (2014) Future climate and fire interactions in the Southeastern region of the United States. Forest Ecol Manag. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.003
  43. Mokany K, Raison R, Prokushkin AS (2006) Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Glob Change Biol 12(1):84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nave L, Gough CM, Maurer KD, Bohrer C, Hardiman B, Le Moine J, Munoz AB, Nadelhoffer K, Sparks JP, Strahm BD, Vogel CS, Curtis PS (2011) Disturbance and the resilience of coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling in a north temperature forest. J Geophys Res 116. doi: 10.1029/2011/JG001758
  45. Ocheltree TW, Loescher HW (2007) Design of the AmeriFlux portable eddy covariance system and uncertainty analysis of carbon measurements. J Atmos Ocean Technol 24(8):1389–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ottmar RD, Sandberg DV, Riccardi CL, Prichard SJ (2007) An overview of the fuel characteristic classification system (FCCS): quantifying, classifying, and creating fuelbeds for resource planning. Can J Forest Res 37:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Powell TL, Gholz HL, Clark KL, Starr G, Cropper WP Jr, Martin TA (2008) Carbon exchange of a mature, naturally regenerated pine forest in north Florida. Global Change Biol 14:2523–2538Google Scholar
  48. Provencher L, Herring BJ, Gordon DR, Rodgers HL, Galley KE, Tanner GW, Hardesty JL, Brennan LA (2001) Effects of hardwood reduction techniques on longleaf pine sandhill vegetation in northwest Florida. Restor Ecol 9:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Randerson JT, Chapin FS III, Harden JW, Neff JC, Harmon ME (2002) Net ecosystem production: a comprehensive measure of net carbon accumulation by ecosystems. Ecol Appl 12:937–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Randerson JT, Liu H, Flanner MG, Chambers SD, Jin Y, Hess PG, Pfister G, Mack MC, Treseder KK, Welp LR, Chapin FS, Harden JW, Goulden ML, Lyons E, Neff JC, Schuur EAG, Zender CS (2006) The influence of boreal forest fire on climate warming. Science 314:1130–1132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rocha AV, Shaver GR (2011) Burn severity influences postfire CO2 exchange in arctic tundra. Ecol Appl 21(2):477–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruimy A, Jarvis PG, Baldocchi DD, Saugier B (1995) CO2 fluxes over plant canopies and solar radiation: a review. Adv Ecol Res 26:1–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryan MC, Williams M (2011) How does fire intensity and frequency affect miombo woodland tree populations and biomass? Ecol Appl 21:48–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  55. Sierra CA, Loescher HW, Harmon ME, Richardson AD, Hollinger DY, Perakis SS (2009) Interannual variation of carbon fluxes from a tropical, a temperate, and a boreal evergreen forest: the role of forest dynamics and climate. Ecology 90:2711–2723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trumbore S (2006) Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems: recent progress and challenges. Global Change Biol 12(2):141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Unger S, Máguas C, Pereira JS, David TS, Werner C (2012) Interpreting post-drought rewetting effects on soil and ecosystem carbon dynamics in a Mediterranean oak savannah. Agric Forest Meteorol 154–155:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wan S, Hui D, Luo Y (2001) Fire effects on nitrogen pools and dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 11(5):1349–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Way AG (2006) Burned to be wild: Herbert Stoddard and the roots of ecological conservation in the southern longleaf pine forest. Environ Hist 11:500–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whelan A, Mitchell RJ, Staudhammer CL, Starr G (2013) The cyclic occurrence of fire and its role in carbon dynamics along an edaphic moisture gradient in longleaf pine ecosystems. PLoS One 8(1):e54045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.00540 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiedinmyer C, Hurteau MD (2010) Prescribed burning as a means of reducing carbon emissions in the Western United States. Environ Sci Technol 44:1926–1932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiedinmyer C, Neff JC (2007) Estimates of CO2 from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management. Carbon Balanc Manag. doi: 10.1186/1750-0680-2-10
  63. Xu, W, Wan S (2008) Water- and plant-mediated responses of soil respiration to topography, fire, and nitrogen fertilization in a semiarid grassland in northern China. Soil Bio Biochem. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031
  64. Xu L, Lin X, Amen J, Welding K, McDermitt D (2014) Impact of changes in barometric pressure on landfill methane emission. Global Biogeochem Cy. doi: 10.1002/2013GB004571

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Starr
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. L. Staudhammer
    • 1
  • H. W. Loescher
    • 2
    • 3
  • R. Mitchell
    • 4
  • A. Whelan
    • 1
  • J. K. Hiers
    • 5
  • J. J. O’Brien
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) Inc.BoulderUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR)University of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  4. 4.Jones Ecological Research CenterNewtonUSA
  5. 5.Natural Resource Section at Jackson GuardNicevilleUSA
  6. 6.Center for Forest Disturbance ScienceUSDA Forest ServiceAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations