New Forests

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 523–543 | Cite as

Assessment of leaf mass and leaf area of tree crowns in young Eucalyptus grandis and E. globulus plantations from measurements made on the stems



Leaf area is a key driver of growth models and leaf weight is important for studying carbon and nutrient cycling in forestry. Both can change over relatively short intervals in young plantations in response to silvicultural treatments and climatic conditions. Relationships to estimate leaf dry weight and leaf area of young Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.) were developed from harvested trees ranging from 0.28 to 15.85 m and 0.12 to 34.4 m in height respectively. Trees were harvested from existing experiments in south-eastern Queensland and south-west Western Australia in order to assess the effects of spacing and application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on early plantation growth. A range of tree measurements were taken to determine the most efficient way to monitor the performance of young plantation eucalyptus. Leaf weight (Wleaf, kg) and leaf area (m2) were related to stem cross sectional area at the height of the base of the green crown (SACB), but the slope and intercept of the relationship differed for trees with predominantly juvenile foliage and those with predominantly intermediate or adult foliage. Specific leaf area (m2 kg−2) changed as the trees aged and leaf area was more closely related to the size of the support structure, represented by the stem volume within the green crown, approximated by the volume of a cone above the base of the green crown (VC,gc). Significantly, the relationships also applied to individual branches, that is, leaf weight was related to sectional area near the base of the branch (SAb) and leaf area to the volume of the main (first order) branch (VC,br). Most of the published work has been directed at trees of commercial size or to small trees in pot experiments, much less to small trees in the establishment phase of growth of interest to experimenters and managers looking at early intervention. This study provides a mechanism to directly assess canopies of intermediate size trees which are of interest for assessing treatment effects or early intervention for managers.


Leaf area Allometrics Tree crowns 


  1. Albrektson A (1984) Sapwood basal area and needle mass of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees in central Sweden. Forestry 57:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartelink HH (1996) Allometric relationships on biomass and needle area of Douglas-fir. For Ecol Manage 86:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskerville GL (1972) Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can J For 2:49–53Google Scholar
  4. Battaglia M, Sands P, White D, Mummery D (2004) CABALA: a linked carbon, water and nitrogen model of forest growth for silvicultural decision support. For Ecol Manage 193:251–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biging GS, Wensel LC (1990) Estimation of crown form for six conifer species of northern California. Can J For Res 20:1137–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bréda NJJ (2003) Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot 54:2403–2417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvo-Alvaredo JC, McDowell NG, Waring RH (2008) Allometric relationships predicting foliar biomass and leaf area:sapwood area ratios from tree height in five Costa Rican rain forest species. Tree Physiol 28:1601–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Jones RM, Charles-Edwards DA, Barnes A (1989) Project STAG: an experimental study in agroforestry. Aust J Agric Res 40:699–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carron LT (1968) An outline of forest mensuration with special reference to Australia. Australian National University Press, Canberra. Library of Congress Catalog Card no. 68-54900, National Library of Australia reg. no.AUS 68-2022Google Scholar
  10. Chen JM, Black TA, Adams RS (1991) Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand. Agric For Meteorol 56:129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cromer RN, Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Ryan PA, Brown M (1993) Response to nutrients in Eucalyptus grandis, 1. Biomass accumulation. For Ecol Manage 62:211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cromer RN, Balodis V, Cameron D, Garland CP, Rance S, Ryan P (1998) Eucapyptus grandis fertilizer trials: growth, wood properties and Kraft pulp yield. Appita J 51:45–49Google Scholar
  13. Cruziat P, Cochard H, Améglio T (2002) Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Ann For Sci 59:723–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eamus D, McGuinness K, Burrows W (2000) Review of allometric relationships for estimating woody biomass for Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia. National carbon accounting system technical report no. 5A. Australian Greenhouse Office. 56 pp. ISSN 14426838Google Scholar
  15. Eastham J, Rose CW, Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Talsma T (1988) The effect of tree spacing on evaporation from an agroforestry experiment. Agric For Meteorol 42:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eastham J, Rose CW, Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Talsma T, Charles-Edwards DA (1990a) Tree/Pasture interactions at a range of tree densities in an agroforestry experiment. II Water uptake in relation to rooting patterns. Aust J Agric Res 41:697–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eastham J, Rose CW, Charles-Edwards DA, Cameron DM, Rance SJ (1990b) Planting density effects on water use efficiency of trees and pasture in an agroforestry experiment. NZ J For Sci 20:39–53Google Scholar
  18. Espinosa Bancalari MA, Perry DA, Marshall JD (1987) Leaf area—sapwood area relationships in adjacent young Douglas-fir stands with different early growth rates. Can J For Res 17:174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ford ED (1985) Branching, crown structure and the control of timber production. In: Cannell MJR, Jackson JE (eds) Attributes of trees as crop plants. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Great Britain, pp 228–252Google Scholar
  20. Fownes and Harrington (1991) Allometry of woody biomass and leaf area in five tropical multipurpose trees. J Trop For Sci 4:317–330Google Scholar
  21. Gower ST, Norman JM (1991) Rapid estimation of leaf area index in conifer and broad leaf plantations. Ecology 72:1896–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gower ST, Kucharik CJ, Norman JM (1999) Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, ∫APAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 70:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray HR (1956) The form and taper of forest-tree stems. Institute paper No. 32. Imperial Forestry Institute, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Greguire TH, Valentine H, Furnival G (1995) Sampling methods to estimate foliage and other characteristics of individual trees. Ecology 76:1181–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grier CC, Waring RH (1974) Conifer foliage mass related to sapwood area. For Sci 20:205–206Google Scholar
  26. Husch B (1963) Forest mensuration and statistics. The Ronald Press Company, New York. Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number: 63-9290Google Scholar
  27. Kaufmann MR, Troendle CA (1981) The relationship of leaf area and foliage biomass to sapwood conducting area in four subalpine forest tree species. For Sci 27:477–482Google Scholar
  28. Keane MG, Weetman GF (1987) Leaf area—sapwood cross-sectional area relationships in repressed stands of lodgepole pine. Can J For Res 17:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keith H, Barrett D, Keenan R (2000) Review of allometric relationships for estimating woody biomass for New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia. National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report No. 5B. The Australian Greenhouse Office. 111 pp. ISSN 14426838Google Scholar
  30. Landsberg J, Waring RH (1997) A generalized model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance, and partitioning. For Ecol Manage 95:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laubhann D, Eckműllner O, Sterba H (2010) Applicability of non-destructive substitutes for leaf area in different stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) focusing on traditional forest growth measures. For Ecol Manage 260:1498–1506PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leuning R, Cromer RN, Rance S (1991) Spatial distributions of foliar nitrogen and phosphorus in crowns of Eucalyptus grandis. Oecologia 88:504–510Google Scholar
  33. Long JN, Smith FW (1988) Leaf area—sapwood area relations of lodgepole pine as influenced by stand density and site index. Can J For Res 18:247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loomis RM, Phares RE, Crosby JS (1966) Estimating foliage and branchwood quantities in shortleaf pine. For Sci 12:30–39Google Scholar
  35. McDowell N, Barnard H, Bond BJ, Hinckly T, Hubbard RM, Ishii H, Köstner B, Magnani F, Marshall JD, Meinzer FC, Phillips N, Ryan MG, Medhurst JL, Battaglia M, Cherry ML, Hunt MA, White DA, Beadle CL, Medhurst JL (1999) Allometric relationships for Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden plantations. Trees 14:91–101Google Scholar
  36. Mencuccini M, Grace J (1994) Climate influences the leaf area/sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiol 15:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mendham DS, O'Connell AM, Grove TS, Rance SJ (2003) Residue management effects on soil carbon and nutrient contents and growth of second rotation eucalypts. For Ecol Manage 181:357–372Google Scholar
  38. Nelder JA (1962) New kinds of systematic designs for spacing experiments. Biometrics 18:283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nygren P, Rebottaro S, Chavarria R (1993) Application of the pipe model theory to non-destructive estimation of leaf biomass and leaf area of pruned agroforestry trees. Agrofor Syst 23:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Connell AM, Grove TS, Mendham DS, Rance SJ (2002) Inter-rotation site management of Eucalypt plantations in south-western Australai: a partner project in the CIFOR Network on site management and productivity. Paper presented at the “International Symposium on Eucalypt Plantations” at Guangzhou, China, 1–6 Sept 2002Google Scholar
  41. Pearson JA, Fahey TJ, Knight DH (1984) Biomass and leaf area in contrasting lodgepole pine stands. Can J For Res 14:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pook EW (1985) Canopy dynamics of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. III Effects of drought. Aust J Bot 33:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL
  44. Rance SJ, Myers RJK, Cameron DM (2009) Dynamics of uptake, distribution and utilization of nitrogen applied at different times after planting in a Eucalyptus grandis plantation. Plant Soil 324:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rance SJ, Mendham DS, Cameron DM, Grove TS (2012) An evaluation of the conical approximation as a generic model for estimating stem volume, biomass and nutrient content in young Eucalyptus plantations. New Forest 43:109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saur E, Nambiar EKS, Fife DN (2000) Foliar nutrient retranslocation in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiol 20:1105–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964a) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Jpn J Ecol 14:97–105Google Scholar
  48. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964b) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Jpn J Ecol 14:133–139Google Scholar
  49. Snowdon P (1986) Sampling strategies and methods of estimating the biomass of crown components in individual trees of Pinus radiata D. Don. Aust For Res 16:63–72Google Scholar
  50. Snowdon P (1991) A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions. Can J For Res 21:720–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soares P, Tome M, Skovsgaard JP, Vanclay JK (1995) Evaluating a growth model for forest management using continuous forest inventory data. For Ecol Manage 71:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tobin B, Black K, Osborne B, Reidy B, Bolger T, Nieuwenhuis M (2006) Assessment of allometric algorithms for estimating leaf biomass, leaf area index and litter fall in different-aged Sitka spruce forests. Forestry 79:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tyree M, Ewers F (1991) Tansley review no. 34. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vieilledent G, Vaudry R, Andriamanohisoa SFD, Rakotonarivo OS, Randrianasolo HZ, Razafindrabe HN, Rakotoarivony CB, Ebeling J, Rasamoelina M (2012) A universal approach to estimate biomass and carbon stock in tropical forests using generic allometric models. Ecol Appl 22:572–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waring RH, Schroeder PE, Oren R (1982) Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can J For Res 12:556–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White D, Beadle C, Worledge D, Honeyset J, Cherry M (1998) The influence of drought on the relationship between leaf and conducting sapwood area in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Trees 12:406–414Google Scholar
  57. White DA, Battaglia M, Mendham DS, Crombie DS, Kinal J, McGrath J (2010) Observed and modelled leaf area index in Eucalyptus globulus plantations: tests of optimality and equilibrium hypotheses. Tree Physiol 30:831–844 Google Scholar
  58. Whitehead D (1978) The estimation of foliage area from sapwood basal area in Scots pine. Forestry 51:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesWembleyAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, National Centre for Future Forest Industries, and CRC ForestryHobartAustralia
  3. 3.Sustainable Forestry Program, School of Environmental Science and ManagementSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations