Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 509–519 | Cite as

Aboveground biomass estimation of small diameter woody species of tropical dry forest

  • R. K. ChaturvediEmail author
  • A. S. Raghubanshi
Article

Abstract

Estimation of accurate biomass of different forest components is important to estimate their contribution to total carbon stock. There is lack of allometric equations for biomass estimation of woody species at sapling stage in tropical dry forest (TDF), and therefore, the carbon stored in this forest component is ignored. We harvested 46 woody species at sapling stage in a TDF and developed regression models for the biomass estimation of foliage, branch, bole and the total aboveground part. For foliage and branch biomass, the models with only stem diameter as estimator showed greater R 2. For bole and aboveground biomass, the models including wood specific gravity or wood density exhibited higher R 2 than those without wood density. Also, the model consisting of wood density, stem diameter and height had the lowest standard error of estimate for bole and aboveground biomass. Moreover, the R 2 values are very similar among models for each component. The measurement error of height and the use of a standard value of wood density together may introduce more than 2 % error into the models. Therefore, we suggest using diameter-only model, which may be more practical and equally accurate when applied to stands outside our study area.

Keywords

Aboveground biomass Tropical dry forest Saplings Regression model Wood specific gravity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Divisional Forest Officer, Renukoot, Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh India for granting permission to work in the forest. They also thank the Associate Editor and the Reviewer for reviewing the manuscript and offering helpful suggestions. R.K. Chaturvedi thanks Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for funding support in the form of Senior Research Fellow (Extended).

References

  1. Attiwill PM (1962) Estimating branch dry weight and leaf area from measurement of branch girth in eucalyptus. For Sci 8:132–141Google Scholar
  2. Baker TR, Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Almeida S, Arroyo L, Di Fiore A, Killeen T, Laurance SG, Laurance WF, Lewis SL, Lloyd J, Monteagudo A, Neill DA, Patiño S, Pitman NCA, Silva N, Vásquez Martínez R (2004) Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Glob Change Biol 10:545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargali SS, Singh SP, Singh RP (1992) Structure and function of an age series of eucalyptus plantations in Central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 69:405–411Google Scholar
  4. Basuki TM, van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, Hussin YA (2009) Allometric equation s for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. For Ecol Manage 257:1684–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandeis TJ, Delaney M, Parresol BR, Royer L (2006) Development of equations for predicting Puerto Rican subtropical dry forest biomass and volume. For Ecol Manage 233:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO Forestry Paper 134, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, p 55Google Scholar
  7. Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989) Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci 35:881–902Google Scholar
  8. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS (2011) Plant functional traits in a tropical deciduous forest: an analysis. Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS (1987) The structure and function of pine forest in central Himalaya. II. Nutrient dynamics. Ann Bot 60:53–67Google Scholar
  10. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2010) Non-destructive estimation of tree biomass by using wood specific gravity in the estimator. Nat Acad Sci Lett 33:133–138Google Scholar
  11. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2011a) Carbon density and accumulation in woody species of tropical dry forest in India. For Ecol Manage 262:1576–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2011b) Plant functional traits with particular reference to tropical deciduous forests: a review. J Biosci 36:963–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2011c) Effect of small-scale variations in environmental factors on the distribution of woody species in tropical deciduous forests of Vindhyan Highlands, India. J Bot, vol. 2011. Article ID 297097, 10 pp. doi: 10.1155/2011/297097
  14. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2012) Effect of grazing and harvesting on diversity, recruitment and carbon accumulation of juvenile trees in tropical dry forests. For Ecol Manage 284:152–162Google Scholar
  15. Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R (2004) Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:409–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure J-P, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark DA, Clark DB (1992) Life history diversity of canopy and emergent trees in a neotropical rain forest. Ecol Monogr 62:315–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole TG, Ewel JJ (2006) Allometric equations for four valuable tropical tree species. For Ecol Manage 229:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardized and easy measurement of functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang JY, Brown S, Tang YH, Naruurs G-J, Wang XP, Shen HH (2006) Overestimated biomass carbon pools of the northern mid- and high latitude forests. Clim Change 74:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fearnside PM (1997) Greenhouse gases from deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: net committed emissions. Clim Change 35:321–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fonseca W, Alice FE, Rey-Benayas JM (2012) Carbon accumulation in aboveground and belowground biomass and soil of different age native forest plantations in the humid tropical lowlands of Costa Rica. New For 43:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodale CL, Apps MJ, Birdsey RA, Field CB, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jenkins JC, Kohlmaier GH, Kurz W, Liu SR, Nabuurs GJ, Nilsson S, Shvidenko AZ (2002) Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecol Appl 12:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houghton RA (2003) Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus 55B:378–390Google Scholar
  25. Houghton RA (2005) Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Glob Change Biol 11:945–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jha CS, Singh JS (1990) Composition and dynamics of dry tropical forest in relation to soil texture. J Veg Sci 1:609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King DA, Davies SJ, Tan S, Noor NSMD (2006) The role of wood density and stem support costs in the growth and mortality of tropical trees. J Ecol 94:670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindner A, Sattler D (2012) Biomass estimations in forests of different disturbance history in the Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. New For 43:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lodhiyal N, Lodhiyal LS, Pangtey YPS (2002) Structure and function of Shisham forests in Central Himalaya, India: dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 89:41–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martínez-Yrízar A, Sarukhán J, Pérez-Jiménez A, Rincón E, Maass M, Solís-Magallanes A, Cervantes L (1992) Above-ground phytomass of a tropical deciduous forest on the coast of Jalisco, México. J Trop Ecol 8:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miah MD, Koike M, Shin MY, Akther S (2011) Forest biomass and bioenergy production and the role of CDM in Bangladesh. New For 42:63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morataya R, Galloway G, Berninger F, Kanninen M (1999) Foliage–biomass–sapwood (area and volume) relationships of Tectona grandis L.F. and Gmelina arborea Roxb: silvicultural implications. For Ecol Manage 113:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muller-Landau HC (2004) Interspecific and inter-site variation in wood specific gravity of tropical trees. Biotropica 36:20–32Google Scholar
  34. Návar J (2009) Allometric equations for tree species and carbon stocks for forests of northwestern Mexico. For Ecol Manage 257:427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson BW, Mesquita R, Pereira JLG, de Souza SGA, Batista GT, Couto LB (1999) Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon. For Ecol Manage 117:149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perez LD, Kanninen M (2002) Wood specific gravity and aboveground biomass of Bombacopsis quinata plantations in Costa Rica. For Ecol Manage 165:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perez LD, Kanninen M (2003) Aboveground biomass of Tectona grandis plantations in Costa Rica. J Trop For Sci 15:199–213Google Scholar
  38. Rawat YS, Singh JS (1988) Structure and function of oak forests in central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 62:397–411Google Scholar
  39. Segura M, Kanninen M (2005) Allometric models for tree volume and total aboveground biomass in a tropical humid forest in Costa Rica. Biotropica 37:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Jap J Ecol 14:133–139Google Scholar
  41. Sims REH (2003) Bioenergy options for a cleaner environment: in developed and developing countries. Elsevier Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh L, Singh JS (1991) Species structure, dry matter dynamics and carbon flux of a dry tropical forest in India. Ann Bot 68:263–273Google Scholar
  43. Singh V, Tewari A, Kushwaha SPS, Dadhwal VK (2011) Formulating allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stock in small diameter trees. For Ecol Manage 261:1945–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turner J, Cole DW (1973) A review of forest biomass accumulation. Coniferous Forest Biome Internal Report, No. 56Google Scholar
  45. Wang JK, Zhong AL, Comeau P, Tsze M, Kimmin JP (1995) Above ground biomass and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the boreal white and black spruce zone, British Columbia. For Ecol Manage 78:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williamson GB, Wiemann MC (2010) Age-dependent radial increases in wood specific gravity of tropical pioneers. Biotropica 42:590–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations