New Forests

, Volume 43, Issue 5–6, pp 779–790 | Cite as

Leaf physiology and sugar concentrations of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings in relation to nutrient and water availability

  • Joshua L. Sloan
  • Douglass F. Jacobs


Newly planted seedlings incur transplant stress resulting from poor root-soil contact, which limits access to soil moisture and nutrients and reduces growth for one or more growing seasons. Controlled release fertilizer (CRF) applied at planting may reduce transplant stress by augmenting rhizosphere nutrient availability yet with potential risk of root system damage due to elevated fertilizer salt concentrations, which may be further exacerbated by drought. Under controlled conditions, we examined northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) leaf physiological parameters and soluble sugar concentrations in response to varying nutrient levels (via CRF application) and moisture availability gradients ranging from drought to flooding. Net photosynthetic rates, transpiration rates, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters responded positively to CRF application, and no interactions were observed between CRF and moisture availability; however, CRF did not increase soluble sugar concentrations. No effects of short-term drought were observed, but flooding exerted a rapid negative influence on net photosynthetic rates, transpiration rates, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters; flooding also elevated soluble sugar concentrations, indicative of disrupted carbon partitioning and a much greater sensitivity to root-zone hypoxia than to drought in this species. Lack of interactions between CRF application and soil moisture availability indicates relatively similar responses of fertilized seedlings across moisture gradients.


Flooding Drought Photosynthesis Controlled release fertilizer Transplant stress 



We thank Suzanne Cunningham and Jeff Volenec for instruction in the analysis of plant carbohydrates, advice, technical assistance, and for generously allowing the use of their lab for parts of this experiment; Jim McKenna for the generous contribution of seedlings for use in this experiment; Charles Michler for assistance in acquisition of critical analytical equipment; and Derek Heacock and Miranda Vogel for their contributions of time and technical assistance.


  1. Anderson PD, Tomlinson PT (1998) Ontogeny affects response of northern red oak seedlings to elevated CO2 and water stress. I. Carbon assimilation and biomass production. New Phytol 140:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelov MN, Sung SS, Doong RL, Harms WR, Kormanik PP, Black CC Jr (1996) Long- and short-term flooding effects on survival and sink-source relationships of swamp-adapted tree species. Tree Physiol 16:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dey DC, Gardiner ES, Kabrick JM, Stanturf JA, Jacobs DF (2010) Innovations in afforestation of agricultural bottomlands to restore native forests in the eastern United States. Scan J For Res 25:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickson RE, Tomlinson PT, Isebrands JG (2000) Partitioning of current photosynthate to different chemical fractions in leaves, stems, and roots of northern red oak seedlings during episodic growth. Can J For Res 30:1308–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gravatt DA, Kirby CJ (1998) Patterns of photosynthesis and starch allocation in seedlings of four bottomland hardwood tree species subjected to flooding. Tree Physiol 18:411–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossnickle SC (2005) Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forest 30:273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanson PJ, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG, Crow TR, Dixon RK (1986) A morphological index of Quercus seedling ontogeny for use in studies of physiology and growth. Tree Physiol 2:273–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs DF (2003) Nursery production of hardwood seedlings. FNR-212. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs DF, Timmer VR (2005) Fertilizer-induced changes in rhizosphere electrical conductivity: relation to forest tree seedling root system growth and function. New Forest 30:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs DF, Rose R, Haase DL, Alzugaray PO (2004a) Fertilization at planting inhibits root system development and drought avoidance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings. Ann For Sci 61:643–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs DF, Ross-Davis AL, Davis AS (2004b) Establishment success of conservation tree plantations in relation to silvicultural practices in Indiana, USA. New Forest 28:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs DF, Salifu KF, Seifert JR (2005) Growth and nutritional response of hardwood seedlings to controlled-release fertilization at outplanting. Forest Ecol Manag 214:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs DF, Salifu KF, Davis AS (2009) Drought susceptibility and recovery of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings in relation to root system morphology. Ann For Sci 66:504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleiner KW, Abrams MD, Schultz JC (1992) The impact of water and nutrient deficiencies on the growth, gas exchange and water relations of red oak and chestnut oak. Tree Physiol 11:271–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morrissey RC, Jacobs DF, Davis AS, Rathfon RA (2010) Survival and competitiveness of Quercus rubra regeneration associated with planting stocktype and harvest opening intensity. New Forest 40:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pezeshki SR, Pardue JH, DeLaune RD (1996) Leaf gas exchange and growth of flood-tolerant and flood-sensitive tree species under low soil redox conditions. Tree Physiol 16:453–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rengifo E, Tezara W, Herrera A (2005) Water relations, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and contents of saccharides in tree species of a tropical forest in response to flood. Photosynthetica 43:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ross-Davis AL, Broussard SR, Jacobs DF, Davis AS (2005) Afforestation behavior of private landowners: an examination of hardwood tree plantings in Indiana. N J Appl For 22:149–153Google Scholar
  20. Sloan JL, Jacobs DF (2008) Carbon translocation patterns associated with new root proliferation during episodic growth of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings. Tree Physiol 28:1121–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. South DB, Zwolinski JB (1996) Transplant stress index: a proposed method of quantifying planting check. New Forest 13:311–324Google Scholar
  22. Tomlinson PT, Anderson PD (1998) Ontogeny affects response of northern red oak seedlings to elevated CO2 and water stress. II. Recent photosynthate distribution and growth. New Phytol 140:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration CenterPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations