New Forests

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 119–134

Drought effects on water use efficiency, freezing tolerance and survival of Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus globulus × nitens cuttings

  • Darío Navarrete-Campos
  • León A. Bravo
  • Rafael A. Rubilar
  • Verónica Emhart
  • Rebeca Sanhueza


Genetic improvement of Eucalyptus genotypes for drought and frost resistance is essential for successful intensive management of commercial plantations. Understanding the physiological mechanisms that relate water use and frost resistance for highly deployed genotypes may allow for better prediction of their future performance, genetic selection and seedling management for site specific purposes. We studied whether instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) may serve as drought, freezing and photoinhibition tolerance predictor by studying its response on six E. globulus clones (Eg1–Eg6) and four E. globulus × E. nitens hybrid seedlings (Egn1–Egn4) under drought and irrigated (control) treatments. Net photosynthesis (A) and transpiration (E) were studied using a gas exchange system in order to calculate WUEi (A/E). Simultaneous chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements were performed to assess the non photochemical quenching components. Frost tolerance of plants under control and drought treatments were evaluated by measuring temperatures that exert 50% photoinactivation of photosystem II. Finally, drought tolerance was evaluated by plant survival within each genotype after rehydration. Our results showed significant genotype variability in the rate of soil and xylem water potential decrease during drought. While most of the genotypes reached −4.0 MPa in about 35 days of drought, genotypes Eg6 and Egn4 required 56 days of drought to reach this xylem water potential. WUEi exhibited significant differences among genotypes and irrigation treatments. Genotypes Eg5 and Egn4 increased their WUEi between 70 and 80% after drought. This was associated with a more conservative control of water loss at the stomatal level combined with maintenance of relatively higher rates of net photosynthesis than the other genotypes under drought conditions. Plants exposed to drought were more freezing tolerant than control plants, having in average 3°C lower LT50 than well irrigated ones. There was no a clear correlation between WUEi and drought tolerance or drought-induced photoinhibition, however WUEi was inversely correlated with LT50. Our results suggest that WUEi is not suitable by itself to select drought tolerant genotypes, but may provide evidence for discarding drought sensitive genotypes. In addition, it could provide valuable information to select for freezing tolerance.


Frost Acclimation Drought E. globulus E. nitens 


  1. Almeida MH, Chaves MM, Silva JC (1994) Cold acclimation in eucalypt hybrids. Tree Physiol 14:921–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida AC, Landsberg JJ, Sands PJ (2004a) Parameterisation of 3-PG model for fast-growing Eucalyptus grandis plantations. For Ecol Manag 193:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida AC, Landsberg JJ, Sands PJ, Ambrogi MS, Fonseca S, Barddal SM, Bertolucci FL (2004b) Needs and opportunities for using a process-based productivity model as a practical tool in Eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag 193:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almeida AC, Soares JV, Landsberg JJ, Rezende GD (2007) Growth and water balance of Eucalyptus grandis hybrid plantations in Brazil during a rotation for pulp production. For Ecol Manag 251:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ares A, Fownes JH (2000) Productivity, nutrient and water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus saligna and Toona ciliata in Hawaii. For Ecol Manag 139:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baesso RCE, Ribeiro A, Silva MP (2010) The impact of climatic changes on Eucalyptus productivity in Northern Espirito Santo and Southern Bahia. Cienc Florest 20:335–344Google Scholar
  7. Bison O, Ramalho MAP, Rezende GDSP, Aguiar AM, Van der Resende MD (2007) Combining ability of elite clones of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla with Eucalyptus globulus. Genet Mol Biol 30:417–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyden S, Binkley D, Stape JL (2008) Competition among Eucalyptus trees depends on genetic variation and resource supply. Ecology 89:2850–2859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bravo LA, Gallardo J, Navarrete A, Olave N, Martínez J, Alberdi M, Close TJ, Corcuera LJ (2003) Cryoprotective activity of a cold-induced dehydrin purified from barley. Physiol Plant 118:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bravo LA, Saavedra-Mella FA, Vera F, Guerra A, Cavieres LA, Ivanov AG, Huner NPA, Corcuera LJ (2007) Effect of cold acclimation on the photosynthetic performance of two ecotypes of Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. J Exp Bot 58:3581–3590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo RDP, Contreras D, Baeza J, Otto M, Agurto C, Freer J (2010) Classification of genotypes of Eucalyptus globulus under cold conditions using their free amino acids content on leaves and regularized discriminant analysis (RDA). J Chil Chem Soc 55:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cernusak LA, Aranda J, Marshall JD, Winter K (2007) Large variation in whole-plant water-use efficiency among tropical tree species. New Phytol 173:294–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30(3):239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Close TJ (1997) Dehydrins: a commonality in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiol Plant 100:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Close DC, Beadle CL, Brown PH, Holz GK (2000) Cold-induced photoinhibition affects establishment of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden and Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Trees Struct Funct 15:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coopman RE, Jara JC, Bravo LA, Sáez KL, Mella GR, Escobar R (2008) Changes in morpho-physiological attributes of Eucalyptus globulus plants in response to different drought hardening treatments. Electron J Biotechnol 11:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coopman RE, Jara JC, Escobar R, Corcuera LJ, Bravo LA (2010) Genotypic variation in morphology and freezing resistance of Eucalyptus globulus seedlings subjected to drought hardening in nursery. Electron J Biotechnol 13:5–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa e Silva F, Shvaleva A, Broetto F, Ortuño MF, Rodrigues ML, Almeida MH, Chaves MM, Pereira JS (2009) Acclimation to short-term low temperatures in two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought resistance. Tree Physiol 29:77–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cromer RN, Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Ryan PA, Brown M (1993) Response to nutrients in Eucalyptus grandis. 1. Biomass accumulation. For Ecol Manag 62:211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dwivedi P, Alavalapati JRR (2009) Stakeholders’ perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US. Energ Policy 37:1999–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez M, Marcos C, Tapias R, Ruiz F, Lopez G (2007) Nursery fertilisation affects the frost-tolerance and plant quality of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. cuttings. Ann For Sci 64:865–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flexas J, Barón M, Bota J, Ducruet J-M, Gallé A, Galmés J, Jiménez M, Pou A, Ribas-Carbó M, Sajnani C, Tomàs M, Medrano H (2009) Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris). J Exp Bot 60:2361–2377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flores FJ, Allen LH (2004) Efectos del clima y capacidad de almacenamiento de agua del suelo en la productividad de rodales de pino radiata en Chile: Un analisis utilizando el modelo 3-PG. Bosque 25:11–24Google Scholar
  24. Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L (2005) Photosynthetic gas exchange, growth and biomass allocation of two Eucalyptus and three indigenous tree species of Ethiopia under moisture deficit. For Ecol Manag 205:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gurovich LA, Holmberg J, Lyon A (1996) Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.) growth and water use under differential irrigation regimes. Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria 23:61–79Google Scholar
  26. Kratsch HA, Wise RR (2000) The ultrastructure of chilling stress. Plant Cell Environ 23:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I, Hotelling H (eds) Stanford University Press, pp 278–292Google Scholar
  29. Li C (2000) Population differences in water-use efficiency of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings under different watering regimes. Physiol Plant 108:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loveys BR, Egerton JJG, Ball MC (2006) Higher daytime leaf temperatures contribute to lower freeze tolerance under elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 29:1077–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loveys BR, Egerton JJG, Bruhn D, Ball MC (2010) Disturbance is required for CO2-dependent promotion of woody plant growth in grasslands. Funct Plant Biol 37:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin B, Tauer CG, Lin RK (1999) Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato. Crop Sci 39:1775–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mokotedi MEO (2010) Physiological responses of Eucalyptus nitens × nitens under experimentally imposed water stress. South For 72:63–68Google Scholar
  35. Mokotedi MEO, Watt MP, Pammenter NW (2009) Analysis of differences in field performance of vegetatively and seed-propagated Eucalyptus varieties I: survival and leaf gas exchange. South For 71:267–271Google Scholar
  36. Munne-Bosch S, Jubany-Mari T, Alegre L (2001) Drought-induced senescence is characterized by a loss of antioxidant defences in chloroplasts. Plant Cell Environ 24:1319–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nishida I, Murata N (1996) Chilling sensitivity in plants and cyanobacteria: the crucial contribution of membrane lipids. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:541–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noctor G, Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Driscoll S, Novitskaya L, Foyer CH (2002) Drought and oxidative load in the leaves of C3 plants: a predominant role for photorespiration? Ann Bot 89 Spec No: 841–850Google Scholar
  39. Osorio J, Pereira JS (1994) Genotypic differences in water use efficiency and 13C discrimination in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiol 14:871–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pepper DA, McMurtrie RE, Medlyn BE, Keith H, Eamus D (2008) Mechanisms linking plant productivity and water status for a temperate Eucalyptus forest flux site: analysis over wet and dry years with a simple model. Funct Plant Biol 35:493–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piper FI, Corcuera LJ, Alberdi M, Lusk C (2007) Differential photosynthetic and survival responses to soil drought in two evergreen Nothofagus species. Ann For Sci 64:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pook EW, Gill AM, Moore PHR (1997) Long-term variation of litter fall, canopy leaf area and flowering in a Eucalyptus maculata forest on the south coast of New South Wales. Aust J Bot 45:737–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raison RJ, Khanna PK, Benson ML, Myers BJ, McMurtrie RE, Lang ARG (1992) Dynamics of Pinus radiata foliage in relation to water and nitrogen stress: II. Needle loss and temporal changes in total foliage mass. For Ecol Manag 52:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheffé H (1959) The analysis of variance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611Google Scholar
  46. Shvaleva AL, Silva FCE, Breia E, Jouve J, Hausman JF, Almeida MH, Maroco JP, Rodrigues ML, Pereira JS, Chaves MM (2006) Metabolic responses to water deficit in two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought sensitivity. Tree Physiol 26:239–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sinclair TR, Tanner CB, Bennett JM (1984) Water-use efficiency in crop production. Bioscience 34:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stape JL, Goncalves JLM, Goncalves AN (2001) Relationships between nursery practices and field performance for Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil—a historical overview and its increasing importance. New For 22:19–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG (2008) Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations. For Ecol Manag 255:920–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG, Fonseca S, Loos RA, Takahashi EN, Silva CR, Silva SR, Hakamada RE, Ferreira JMD, Lima AMN, Gava JL, Leite FP, Andrade HB, Alves JM, Silva GGC, Azevedo MR (2010) The Brazil Eucalyptus Potential Productivity Project: Influence of water, nutrients and stand uniformity on wood production. For Ecol Manag 259:1684–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taiz L, Zeiger E (1998) Plant physiology, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  52. Valentini R, Mugnozza GS, Giordano E, Kuzminsky E (1990) Influence of cold hardening on water relations of three Eucalyptus species. Tree Physiol 6:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vellini ALTT, Figueiredo de Paula N, Da Costa PL, Pavani LC, Valencise CA, Escarpinati EA, De Paula RC (2008) Respostas fisiológicas de diferentes clones de eucalipto sob diferentes regimes de irrigação. Revista Árvore 32:651–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warren CR, Adams MA (2006) Internal conductance does not scale with photosynthetic capacity: implications for carbon isotope discrimination and the economics of water and nitrogen use in photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 29:192–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White DA, Beadle CL, Worledge D (1996) Leaf water relations of Eucalyptus globulus ssp globulus and E.nitens: Seasonal, drought and species effects. Tree Physiol 16:469–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White D, Beadle C, Worledge D, Honeysett J, Cherry M (1998) The influence of drought on the relationship between leaf and conducting sapwood area in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Trees Struct Funct 12:406–414Google Scholar
  57. White DA, Crombie DS, Kinal J, Battaglia M, McGrath JF, Mendharn DS, Walker SN (2009) Managing productivity and drought risk in Eucalyptus globulus plantations in south-western Australia. For Ecol Manag 259:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams RJ, Myers BA, Muller WJ, Duff GA, Eamus D (1997) Leaf phenology of woody species in a North Australian tropical savanna. Ecology 78:2542–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang B, Pallardy SG, Meyers TP, Gu LH, Hanson PJ, Wullschleger SD, Heuer M, Hosman KP, Riggs JS, Sluss DW (2010) Environmental controls on water use efficiency during severe drought in an Ozark Forest in Missouri, USA. Glob Change Biol 16:2252–2271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darío Navarrete-Campos
    • 1
  • León A. Bravo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rafael A. Rubilar
    • 1
  • Verónica Emhart
    • 4
  • Rebeca Sanhueza
    • 5
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias ForestalesUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Recursos NaturalesUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
  3. 3.Center of Plant, Soil Interaction and Natural Resources Biotechnology, Scientific and Technological Bioresource NucleusUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
  4. 4.Forestal Mininco S.A.Los ÁngelesChile
  5. 5.Seed Production Technologies S.A.QuillotaChile

Personalised recommendations