Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 57–68 | Cite as

Minimizing nutrient leaching and improving nutrient use efficiency of Liriodendron tulipifera and Larix leptolepis in a container nursery system

  • Byung Bae Park
  • Min Seok Cho
  • Soo Won Lee
  • Ruth D. Yanai
  • Don K. LeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Fertilization is essential to seedling production in nursery culture, but excessive fertilization can contaminate surface and ground water around the nursery. The optimal fertilization practice is that which maximizes seedling growth and minimizes nutrient loss. We tested three fertilization strategies: (1) constant fertilization (2) a three-stage rate, and (3) exponential fertilization on Liriodendron tulipifera and Larix leptolepis containerized seedlings. Growth performance, nutrient uptake, and nutrient loss in leaching were measured. Height, root collar diameter, and dry weight of both species were not significantly different among treatments even though the nutrient supply of the exponential treatment was half that of the constant and three-stage treatments. Generally, nutrient losses in leached solutions were higher in constant and three-stage than the exponential treatment. Nutrient use efficiency was calculated as the ratio of the nutrient content of the seedlings to the amount of nutrient applied to the containers. The nitrogen use efficiency in the constant, three-stage, and exponential treatments was 63, 61, and 85% for yellow poplar, respectively, and 35, 30, and 53% for larch. Similar results were obtained for phosphorus and potassium. Thus, the exponential treatment had the highest nutrient use efficiency as well as the least nutrient loss. Adjusting fertilization rates can reduce soil and water contamination around the nursery without compromising growth performance, which reduces both producer’s investments and environmental impacts.

Keywords

Biomass Exponential fertilization Leached solution Nitrogen use efficiency Phosphorus use efficiency Potassium use efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data were collected by Eun Joo Jo at the Forest Practice Research Center of Korea Forest Research Institute and hundreds of solution samples were analyzed by Hye Lim Sung. We thank DF Jacobs, P Smethurst and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments. This research was supported by Research Funds of the Korea Forest Research Institute.

References

  1. Andersen L, Hansen CW (2000) Leaching of nitrogen from container plants grown under controlled fertigation regimes. J Environ Hortic 18:8–12Google Scholar
  2. Auchmoody LR (1974) Nutrient composition of blades, petioles, and whole leaves from fertilized and unfertilized yellow-poplar. USDA forest service research note NE-198Google Scholar
  3. Bremner JM (1965) Total nitrogen. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1149–1178Google Scholar
  4. Broschat TK (1995) Nitrate, phosphate, and potassium leaching from container-grown plants fertilized by several methods. Hort Sci 30:74–77Google Scholar
  5. Bumgarner ML, Salifu KF, Jocobs DF (2008) Subirrigation of Quercus rubra seedlings: nursery stock quality, media chemistry, and early field performance. Hort Sci 43(7):2179–2185Google Scholar
  6. Close DC, Bail I, Hunter S, Beadle CL (2005) Effects of exponential nutrient-loading on morphological and nitrogen characteristics and on after-planting performance of Eucalyptus globulus seedlings. For Ecol Manage 205:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox MS (2001) The Lancaster soil test method as an alternative to the Mehlich 3 soil test method 1. Soil Sci 166(7):484–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumroese RK, Page-Dumroese DS, Salifu KF, Jacobs DF (2005) Exponential fertilization of Pinus monticola seedlings: nutrient uptake efficiency, leaching fractions, and early outplanting performance. Can J For Res 35:2961–2967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumroese RK, Pinto JR, Jacobs DF, Davis AS, Horiuchi B (2006) Subirrigation reduces water use, nitrogen loss, and moss growth in a container nursery. Nat Plants J 7(3):253–261Google Scholar
  10. Gordon WS, Jackson RB (2000) Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecol 81:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heiskanen J (1995) Irrigation regime affects water and aeration conditions in peat growth medium and the growth of containerized Scots pine seedlings. New For 9:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Imo M, Timmer VR (1999) Vector competition analysis of black spruce seedling responses to nutrient loading and vegetation control. Can J For Res 29(4):474–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingestad T, Lund AB (1986) Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants. Scand J For Res 1:439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Juntunen M-L, Hammar T, Rikala R (2002) Leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus during production of forest seedlings in containers. J Environ Qual 31:1868–1874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Korea Forest Research Institute (2009) Annual research report. Ukgo Printing Co, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  16. Korea Forest Service (2009) National report on sustainable forest management in Korea 2009. Korea Forest Service, TaejonGoogle Scholar
  17. Landis TD, Wilkinson K (2004) Subirrigation: a better option for broad-leaved container nursery crops? USDA forest service forest nursery notes summer. pp 14–17Google Scholar
  18. Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP (1989) Seedling nutrition and irrigation, of the container tree nursery manual, vol 4. USDA Forest Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP (1990) Containers and growing media of the container tree nursery manual, vol 2. USDA Forest Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Qu LY, Quoreshi AM, Koike T (2003) Root growth characteristics, biomass and nutrient dynamics of seedlings of two larch species raised under different fertilization regimes. Plant Soil 255:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quoreshi AM, Timmer VR (2000) Early outplanting performance of nutrient-loaded containerized black spruce seedlings inoculated with Laccaria bicolor: a bioassay study. Can J For Res 30:744–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2003) Optimizing nitrogen loading in Picea mariana seedlings during nursery culture. Can J For Res 33:1187–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stowe DC, Lamhamedi MS, Carles S, Fecteau B, Margolis HA, Renaud M, Bernier PY (2010) Managing irrigation to reduce nutrient leaching in containerized white spruce seedling production. New For 40:185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Timmer VR (1996) Exponential nutrient loading: a new fertilization technique to improve seedling performance on competitive sites. New For 13:275–295Google Scholar
  25. Timmer VR, Armstrong G (1987) Growth and nutrition of containerized Pinus resinosa at exponentially increasing nutrient additions. Can J For Res 17:644–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed determination of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Way D, Seegobin S, Sage R (2007) The effect of carbon and nutrient loading during nursery culture on the growth of black spruce seedlings: a six-year field study. New For 34(3):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilde SA, Voigt GK, Lyer JC (1972) Soil and plant analysis for tree culture. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, New DelhiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byung Bae Park
    • 1
  • Min Seok Cho
    • 2
  • Soo Won Lee
    • 2
  • Ruth D. Yanai
    • 3
  • Don K. Lee
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Forest EcologyKorea Forest Research InstituteSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Forest Practice Research CenterKorean Forest Research InstitutePocheonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.SUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA
  4. 4.Department of Forest SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations