New Forests

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Reforestation of degraded Kermes oak shrublands with planted pines: effects on vegetation cover, species diversity and community structure

  • Petros GanatsasEmail author
  • Thekla Tsitsoni
  • Marianthi Tsakaldimi
  • Theocharis Zagas


This paper examines the results of plantings of the Mediterranean pine species, Pinus halepensis and Pinus pinea, in a degraded Mediterranean kermes oak (Quercus coccifera) shrubland in Northern Greece, which were accomplished in order to mitigate ecosystem degradation. Plant establishment and the vegetation differences between the degraded ecosystem’s previous state and the new state following reforestation were measured in order to evaluate the effect of reforestation. Monitoring of the seedling survival and growth of the planted species was carried out during the next five years. In the fifth year we conducted botanical inventories in 18 and 15 plots (50 m2 in size) from the reforested and control area, respectively. Plant community parameters estimated were: vegetation composition, total plant cover, planted species cover, native woody, herb and grass species cover, plant species richness, Shannon-Weiner index, community structure and dominant plant height. P. halepensis exhibited higher survival and growth than P. pinea. The reforested area exhibited higher plant diversity, higher vegetation cover, taller plants and more complex community structures than the control area, which concludes that plantings of pines can be successfully used in degraded ecosystem reforestation projects, in areas with similar site conditions.


Diversity Pinus halepensis Pinus pinea Plantings Reforestation Species richness 


  1. Aronson J, Ovalle C, Avendano J (1993) Ecological and economic rehabilitation of degraded “Espinales” in the subhumid Mediterranean climate-region of central Chile. Landscape Urban Plan 24:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson J, Clewell AF, Blignaut JN, Milton SJ (2006) Ecological restoration: a new frontier for nature conservation and economics. J Nat Conserv 14:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atsamo A (2002) Early effects of four fast-growing tree species and their planting densisty on ground vegetation in Imperata grasslands. New For 23:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augusto L, Duponey J, Ricard J, Ranger J (2001) Potential contribution of the seed bank in coniferous plantations to the restoration of native deciduous forest vegetation. Acta Oecol 22:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baeza MJ, Valdecantos A, Alloza JA, Vallejo VR (2007) Human disturbance and environmental factors as drivers of long-term post-fire regeneration patterns in Mediterranean forests. J Veg Sci 18:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buford MA, Burkhart HE (1987) Genetic improvement effects on growth and yield of loblolly pine plantations. For Sci 33:707–724Google Scholar
  7. Carnevale N, Montagnini F (2002) Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species. For Ecol Manag 163:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dafis S (1973) Classification of forest vegetation of Greece. Sch Agric For Sci Yearb 15:75–90 (in Greek)Google Scholar
  9. Economidou E, Yiannitsaros A (1975) Studies on the alien flora of Greece III. Morphology, development and phenology of Solanum elaeagnifolium. Cav Candollea 30:29–41Google Scholar
  10. Fahnestock JT, Detling JK (1999) The influence of herbivory on plant cover and species composistion in the Pryor Mountain Wild horse range, USA. Plant Ecol 144:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferris R, Peace AJ, Humphrey JW, Broome AC (2000) Relationship between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain. For Ecol Manag 136:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatzistathis A, Dafis S (1989) Reforestation-forest nurseries. Giahoudis-Giapoulis, Thessaloniki (in Greek)Google Scholar
  13. Hatzistathis Α, Ganatsas P, Georgiou A (2000) Research on the improvement of reclamation techniques of mine land in Gerakini, North Greece. In: Tsihritzis VA, Korfiatis GP, Katsifarakis KL, Demetrakopoulos AC (eds) Proc. Int. Conf ‘Protection and restoration of the environment V’, Thassos, vol II, pp 699–706, 3–6 July 2000Google Scholar
  14. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 7:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Honnay O, Bossuyt B, Verheyen K, Butaye J et al (2002) Ecological perspectives for the restoration of plant communities in European temperate forests. Biodivers Conserv 11:213–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huston MA (1998) Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Keenan R, Lamb D, Woldring O, Irvine T, Jensen R (1997) Restoration of plant biodiversity beneath tropical tree plantations in northern Australia. For Ecol Manag 99:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerr G (1999) The use of silvicultural systems to enhance the biological diversity of plantation forests in Britain. Forestry 72:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lugo AE (1997) The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. For Ecol Manag 99:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lunt ID (1990) Species-area curves and growth-form spectra for some herb-rich woodlands in western Victoria, Australia. Aust J Ecol 15:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manag 198:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Naveh Z (1990) Ancrent man’s impact on the Medlterranean landscape of Israel - ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: Bottema S, EntJes-Nleborg G, Van Zetst W (eds) Man’s role in the shaping of the eastern Mediterranean landscape. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  24. Norusis MJ (1994) SPSS professional statistics 6.1. SPSS Inc. SPSS Inc, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Onaindia M, Mitxelena A (2009) Potential use of pine plantations to restore native forests in a highly fragmented river basin. Ann For Sci 66:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perez-Trejo F (1994) Desertification and land degradation in the European Mediterranean. European Commission DG XII, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitkänen S (1997) Correlation between stand structure and ground vegetation: an analytical approach. Plant Ecol 131:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rebele F, Lehmann C (2002) Restoration of a landfill site in Berlin, Germany by spontaneous and directed succession. Restor Ecol 10:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SER (2004) The SER primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration, Science and Policy Working Group.
  30. Stapanian MA, Sundberg SD, Baumgardner GA, Liston A (1998) Alien plant species composition and associations with anthropogenic disturbance in North American forests. Plant Ecol 139:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thirgood JV (1981) Man and the Mediterranean forest. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsitsoni T, Ganatsas P, Zagas T, Hatzistathis A (1999) Rehabilitation of degraded forest ecosystems. AUTh, Thessaloniki, Greece, Technical Report, p 16Google Scholar
  33. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM et al (1993) Flora Europaea, 2nd edn, vol 1–5. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Vallejo VR, Bautista S, Cortina J (1999) Restoration for soil protection after disturbances. In: Trabaud L (ed) Life and environment in the Mediterranean, advances in ecological sciences, vol 3. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 301–343Google Scholar
  35. Vidacovic M, Krstinic A, Durasovic P, Kajba D (1990) Thriving of some species and hybrids of two-needle pines in the Arboretum Trsteno. Annales pro Experiments Foresticis, vol 26. Zagreb in Jugoslavia MXM, pp 331–339Google Scholar
  36. Yirdaw E (2001) Diversity of naturally-regenerated native woody species in forest plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. New For 22:159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zagas Τ, Ganatsas P (2001) Results of a forest species trial in an Arboretum of North Greece. Silva Gandavensis 66:76–88Google Scholar
  38. Zagas T, Hatzistathis A, Tsitsoni T, Ganatsas P (1998) Degradation of Mediterranean forest ecosystems and silvicultural measures for their restoration. European Environmental Research 1(2):53–60Google Scholar
  39. Zagas T, Ganatsas P, Tsitsoni T, Tsakaldimi M (2004) Postfire regeneration of Pinus halepensis Mill. stands in Sithonia peninsula, northern Greece. Plant Ecol 171:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petros Ganatsas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thekla Tsitsoni
    • 1
  • Marianthi Tsakaldimi
    • 1
  • Theocharis Zagas
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Silviculture, School of Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations