Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 235–245 | Cite as

Half-sib seed source and nursery sowing density affect black walnut (Juglans nigra) growth after 5 years

  • K. E. WoesteEmail author
  • D. F. Jacobs
  • J. R. McKenna
Article

Abstract

The effect of seed source (half-sib family) and nursery bed density on the nursery stock quality and subsequent growth of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) was investigated. Nine black walnut female genitors were selected to represent a range of phenotypes. Seeds were collected, cleaned, cold-treated, and pre-sprouted to ensure that germination was uniform and complete. The pre-sprouted seeds were planted in a randomized complete block design into standard nursery beds in Indiana, USA at three sowing densities, (11.2 plants m−2; 24.2 plants m−2; 29.4 plants m−2). After lifting, the trees were measured for height, ground-line diameter and root volume and then planted into a plantation in a randomized complete block design and re-measured after 1 and 5 years of growth. One year after planting, the effects of family (half-sib seed source) and density were significant or very highly significant for seedling height, and ground-line diameter, although family effects were greater than those for density, especially at moderate and high nursery bed density. After 5 years of growth, the same effects contributed significantly to ground-line diameter and dbh, but only family significantly influenced height. Family was more important than nursery bed density in determining the size of the trees after 5 years. Although there were no significant family × density interactions after 5 years, family variance for all the traits was considerably higher among seedlings grown at moderate and high density in the nursery. Phenotypic correlations among traits within and among years were generally very high (0.65 < r < 0.90) and insensitive to planting density in the nursery.

Keywords

Seedling quality Root volume Shoot height Ground line diameter Hardwood genetics Bareroot nursery production 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Indiana Department of Natural Resources Vallonia Nursery provided nursery space to conduct this experiment, and seedling cultural assistance. Brian Beheler, Anthony Davis, and Kevyn Wightman provided greenhouse and/or field assistance. Dan Dey and John Groninger provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the US Dept. of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that also may be suitable.

References

  1. Aletà N, Ninot A, Voltas J (2004) Retrospective evaluation of parental selection in nursery tests of Juglans regia L using mixed model analysis. Silvae Genet 53:26–33Google Scholar
  2. Beineke WF (1989) Twenty years of black walnut genetic improvement at Purdue University. North J Appl For 6:68–71Google Scholar
  3. Burdett AN (1979) A nondestructive method for measuring the volume of intact plant parts. Can J For Res 9:120–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chavasse CGR (1977) The significance of planting height as an indicator of subsequent seedling growth. New Zeal J For 22:283–296Google Scholar
  5. Davis AS, Wilson BC, Jacobs DF (2004) Effect of seed position and media on germination of black walnut and northern red oak: implications for nursery production and direct-seeding. In: Proceedings of sixth black walnut symposium. West Lafayette, IN, 25–28 July 2004. USDA Forest Services, North Central Research Station, Genetic Technology Report NC-243, pp 31–36Google Scholar
  6. Dey DC, Parker WC (1997) Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood. New For 14:145–156Google Scholar
  7. Dixon RK (1988) Seed source and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiont affects growth of Juglans nigra seedlings. New For 2:203–211Google Scholar
  8. Jacobs DF (2003) Nursery production of hardwood seedlings. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, FNR-212, 8 pGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs DF, Davis AS (2005) Genetic considerations in the operational production of hardwood nursery stock in the eastern USA. Native Plants J 6:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs DF, Ross-Davis A, Davis AS (2004) Establishment success of conservation tree plantations in relation to silvicultural practices in Indiana, USA. New For 28:23–36Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs DF, Salifu KF, Seifert JR (2005a) Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New For 30:295–311Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs DF, Woeste KE, McKenna JR, Wilson BC (2005b) Genetic identity proves more significant than nursery sowing density in propagation of high quality black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) seedlings for plantation establishment and rootstocks. Acta Hort (ISHS) 705:375–381Google Scholar
  13. McGranahan GH, Hansen J, Shaw DV (1988) Inter- and intraspecific variation in California black walnuts. J Am Soc Hort Sci 113:760–765Google Scholar
  14. Michler CH, Woeste KE (2002) Strategic plans for the hardwood tree improvement and regeneration center. In: Dumroese RK, Riley LE, Landis TD, Technical coordinators. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations 1999, 2000, 2001. Proceedings RMRS-P-24. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp 93–96Google Scholar
  15. Mohammed GH (1996) The status and future of stock quality testing. New Forest 13:481–504Google Scholar
  16. Namkoong G, Conkle MT (1976) Time trends in genetic control of height growth in Ponderosa Pine. For Sci 22:2–12Google Scholar
  17. Newton M, Cole EC, White DE (1993) Tall planting stock for enhanced growth and domination of brush in the Douglas-fir region. New Forest 7:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rink G (1984) Trends in genetic control of juvenile black walnut height growth. For Sci 30:821–827Google Scholar
  19. Schultz RC, Thompson JR (1996) Effect of density control and undercutting on root morphology of 1 + 0 bareroot hardwood seedlings: five-year field performance of root-graded stock in the central USA. New For 13:297–310Google Scholar
  20. Shifley SR (2004) The Black Walnut Resource in the United States. In: Michler et al. (ed) Black walnut in a New Century. Proceedings of sixth black walnut symposium. West Lafayette, IN, 25–28 July 2004. USDA Forest Services, North Central Research Station, Genetic Technology Report, NC-243, pp 168–176Google Scholar
  21. South DB, Boyer JN, Bosch L (1985) Survival and growth of loblolly pine as influenced by seedling grade–13 year results. South J Appl For 9:74–79Google Scholar
  22. South DB, Rakestraw JL, Lowerts GA (2001) Early gains from planting large-diameter seedlings and intensive management are additive for loblolly pine. New For 22:97–110Google Scholar
  23. St. Clair JB, Adams WT (1991) Relative family performance and variance structure of open-pollinated Douglas-fir seedlings grown in three competitive environments. Theor Appl Genet 81:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson BE (1985) Seedling morphological evaluation: what you can tell by looking. In: Duryea ML (ed) Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive ability of major tests. Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 55–61Google Scholar
  25. Thompson TE, Grauke LJ (2003) Pecan tree growth and precocity. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 128:63–66Google Scholar
  26. Thompson JR, Schultz RC (1995) Root system morphology of Quercus rubra L. planting stock and 3-year field performance in Iowa. New For 9:225–236Google Scholar
  27. Victory E, Woeste K, Rhodes OE (2004) History of black walnut genetics research in North America. In: Michler et al (eds) Black walnut in a new century. Proceedings of sixth black walnut symposium. West Lafayette, IN, 25–28 July 2004. USDA Forest Services, North Central Research Station, Genetic Technology Report, NC-243, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  28. Williams RD (1990) Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.). In: Burns RM, Barbara HH (Tech. Coords.) Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Services, Washington, DC, pp 391–399Google Scholar
  29. Wilson BC, Jacobs DF (2006) Quality assessment of temperate zone deciduous hardwood seedlings. New For 31:417–433Google Scholar
  30. Woeste KE (2002) Heartwood production in a 35-year-old black walnut progeny test. Can J For Res 32:177–181Google Scholar
  31. Zaczek JJ, Steiner KS, Bowersox TW (1996) Northern red oak planting stock: 6-year results. New For 13:175–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA)  2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations