Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 349–360 | Cite as

Effects of water stress induced by sodium chloride and mannitol on proline accumulation, photosynthetic abilities and growth characters of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.)

  • Suriyan Cha-umEmail author
  • Chalermpol Kirdmanee
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the biochemical, physiological and morphological responses of eucalypts to iso-osmotic salt and water deficit stress. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll (TC), total carotenoids, maximum quantum yield of PSII (F v /F m ), photon yield of PSII and non-photochemical quenching, in severely osmotic-stressed plantlets (−1.20 MPa) decreased significantly when compared to control plantlets, leading to low net photosynthetic rate (P n ) and growth reduction. In addition, the photosynthesis and growth parameters of salt stressed plantlets declined to a greater degree than those cultivated in water-deficit conditions. On the other hand, the proline content of the osmotic-stressed leaves increased significantly, especially under iso-osmotic salt stress conditions. The TC content of iso-osmotic stressed leaves was significantly degraded, with low F v /F m , leading to P n reduction and growth inhibition. Those parameters in salt stressed plantlets were significantly lower and to a greater degree than in plantlets subjected to water-deficit. The basic knowledge of biochemical, physiological and morphological changes in responses to iso-osmotic salt and water-deficit stresses will be further applied as effective indices for salt and water-deficit tolerant screening in large population of eucalyptus breeding program.

Keywords

Chlorophyll degradation Chlorophyll a fluorescence Iso-osmotic stress Net photosynthetic rate Salinity Water deficit 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jonathan Shore for grammatical proofing. This experiment was funded by the Siam Cement Group (SCG) and partially supported by the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA).

References

  1. Adams MA, Richter A, Hill AK, Colmer TD (2005) Salt tolerance in Eucalyptus spp.: identity and response of putative osmolytes. Plant Cell Environ 28:772–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Role of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bate LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cha-um S, Supaibulwatana K, Kirdmanee C (2006) Water relation, photosynthetic ability, and growth of Thai jasmine rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. KDML105) to salt stress by application of exogenous glycinebetaine and choline. J Agron Crop Sci 192:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen S, Li J, Wang T, Wang S, Polle A, Hüttermann A (2002) Osmotic stress and ion-specific effects on xylem abscisic acid and the relevance to salinity tolerance in polar. J Plant Growth Regul 21:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa JH, Jolivet Y, Hasenfratz-Sauder MP, Orellano EG, Lima MGS, Dizengremel P, de Melo DF (2007) Alternative oxidase regulation in roots of Vigna unguiculata cultivars differing in drought/salt tolerance. J Plant Physiol 164:718–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dale G, Dieters M (2007) Economic returns from environmental problems: breeding salt- and drought-tolerant eucalypts for salinity abatement and commercial forestry. Ecol Engineer 31:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davenport R, James RA, Zakrisson-Plogander A, Tester M, Munns R (2005) Control of sodium transport in durum wheat. Plant Physiol 137:807–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Herralde F, Biel C, Savé R, Morales MA, Torrecillas A, Alarcón JJ, Sánchez-Blanco MJ (1998) Effect of water and salt stresses on the growth, gas exchange and water relations in Argyranthemum coronopifolium plants. Plant Sci 139:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Hendawy SE, Hu Y, Yakout GM, Awad AM, Hafiz SE, Schmidhalter U (2005) Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. Eur J Agron 22:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Siddig K, Inanaga S, Ali AM, Gebauer J, Ebert G (2004) Response of Tamarindus indica L. to iso-osmotic solutions of NaCl and PEG during germination. J App Bot 78:1–4Google Scholar
  12. Fujiwara K, Kozai T, Watanabe L (1987) Fundamental studies on environment in plant tissue culture vessel. (3) Measurement of carbon dioxide gas concentration in closed vessels containing tissue cultured plantlets and estimates of net photosynthetic rates of the plantlets. J Agri Met 43:21–30Google Scholar
  13. Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L (2004) Response of seedlings of two Eucalyptus and three deciduous tree species from Ethiopia to severe water stress. Forest Ecol Manage 201:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L (2005) Photosynthetic gas exchange, growth and biomass allocation of two Eucalyptus and three indigenous tree species of Ethiopia under moisture deficit. Forest Ecol Manage 205:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glenn EP, Brown JJ (1998) Effects of soil salt levels on the growth and water use efficiency of Atriplex canescens (Chenopodiaceae) varieties in drying soil. Amer J Bot 85:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han KH, Hwang CH (2003) Salt tolerance enhanced by transformation of a P5CS gene in carrot. J Plant Biotech 5:149–153Google Scholar
  17. Hare PD, Cress WA, van Staden J (1999) Proline biosynthesis and degradation: a model system for elucidating stress-related signal transduction. J Exp Bot 50:413–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 51:463–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoque MA, Okuma E, Banu MNA, Nakamura Y, Shimoishi Y, Murata Y (2007) Exogenous proline mitigates the detrimental effects of salt stress more than exogenous betaine by increasing antioxidant enzyme activities. J Plant Physiol 164:553–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huth NI, Carberry PS, Cocks B, Graham S, McGinness HM, O’Connell DA (2008) Managing drought risk in eucalypt seedling establishment: an analysis using experiment and model. Forest Ecol Manage 255:3307–3317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kavi Kishor PB, Sangam S, Amrutha RN, Laxmi PS, Naidu KR, Rao KRSS, Rao S, Reddy KJ, Theriappan P, Sreenivasulu N (2005) Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci 88:424–438Google Scholar
  22. Kaya C, Tuna AL, Ashraf M, Altunlu H (2007) Improved salt tolerance of melon (Cucummis melo L.) by the addition of proline and potassium nitrate. Environ Exp Bot 60:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Legocka J, Kluk A (2005) Effect of salt and osmotic stress on changes in polyamine content and arginine decarboxylase activity in Lupinus luteus seedlings. J Plant Physiol 162:662–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemcoff JH, Guaenaschelli AB, Garau AM, Prystupa P (2002) Elastic and osmotic adjustments in rooted cuttings of several clones of Eucaluptus camaldulensis Dehnh. from southeastern Australia after a drought. Flora 197:134–142Google Scholar
  25. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Method Enzymol 148:350–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loggini B, Scartazza A, Brugnoli E, Navari-Izzo F (1999) Antioxidant defense system, pigment composition, and photosynthetic efficiency in two wheat cultivars subjected to drought. Plant Physiol 119:1091–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lutts S, Almansouri M, Kinet JM (2004) Salinity and water stress have contrasting effects on the relationship between growth and cell viability during and after stress exposure in durum wheat callus. Plant Sci 167:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Macfarlane C, White DA, Adams MA (2004) The apparent feed-forward response to vapour pressure deficit of stomata in droughted, field-grown Eucalyptus globules Labill. Plant Cell Environ 27:1268–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madsen PA, Mullingan DR (2006) Effect of NaCl on emergence and growth of a range of provenances of Eucalyptus citriodora, Eucalyptus populnea, Euclyptus camaldulensis and Acacia salicina. Forest Ecol Manage 228:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophy 444:139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mansour MMF, Salama KHA, Ali FZM, Hadid AFA (2005) Cell and plant responses to NaCl in Zea mays L. cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Gen App Plant Physiol 31:29–41Google Scholar
  32. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence–a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Morabito D, Jolivet Y, Prat D, Dizengremel P (1996) Differences in the physiological responses of two clones of Eucalyptus microtheca selected for their salt tolerance. Plant Sci 114:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muuns R, James RA, Läuchli A (2006) Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J Exp Bot 57:1025–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nanjo T, Kobayashi T, Yoshiba Y, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1999) Antisense suppression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett 461:205–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Neto NB, Saturnino SM, Bomfim DC, Castódio CC (2004) Water stress induced by mannitol and sodium chloride in soybean cultivars. Braz Arch Biol Tech 47:521–529Google Scholar
  38. Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 60:324–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peeva V, Cornic G (2008) Leaf photosynthesis of Haberlea rhodopensis before and during drought. Environ Exp Bot. doi:  10.1016/jenvexpbot.2008.09.009
  40. Pita P, Cañas I, Soria F, Ruiz F, Toval G (2005) Use of physiological traits in tree breeding for improved yield in drought-prone environments. The case of Eucalyptus globules. Invest Agrar: Sist Recur For 14:383–393Google Scholar
  41. Radić S, Prolić M, Pavlica M, Pevalek-Kozlina B (2005) Cytogenetic effects of osmotic stress on the root meristem cells of Centaurea ragusina L. Environ Exp Bot 54:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Radić S, Radić-Stojković M, Pevalek-Kozlina B (2006) Influence of NaCl and mannitol on peroxidase activity and lipid peroidation in Centaurea ragusina L. roots and shoots. J Plant Physiol 163:1284–1292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddy AR, Chitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004) Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 161:1189–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rockwood DL, Rudie AW, Ralph SA, Zhu JY, Winandy JE (2008) Energy product options for Eucalyptus species grown as short rotation woody crops. International J Mol Sci 9:1361–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodríguez P, Torrecillas A, Morales MA, Ortuño MF, Sánchez-Blanco MJ (2005) Effects of NaCl salinity and water stress on growth and leaf water relations of Asteriscus maritimus plants. Environ Exp Bot 53:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rolando CA, Little KM (2008) Measuring water stress in Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden seedlings planted into pots. South Afri J Bot 74:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sairam RK, Tyagi A (2004) Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr Sci 86:407–421Google Scholar
  48. Schütz W, Milberg P, Lamont BB (2002) Germination requirements and seedling responses to water availability and soil type in four eucalypt species. Acta Oecol 23:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shabala SN, Shabala SI, Martynenko AI, Babourina O, Newman IA (1998) Salinity effect on bioelectric activity, growth, Na+ accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize leaves: a comparative survey and prospects for screening. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Susiluoto S, Berninger F (2007) Interactions between morphological and physiological drought responses in Eucalyptus microtheca. Silva Fenn 41:221–233Google Scholar
  51. Tester M, Davenport R (2003) Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot 91:503–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tonon G, Kevers C, Faivre-Rampant O, Graziani M, Gaspar T (2004) Effect of NaCl and mannitol iso-osmotic stresses on proline and free polyamine levels in embryogenic Fraxinus angustifolia callus. J Plant Physiol 161:701–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang B, Lüttge U, Ratajczak R (2001) Effects of salt treatment and osmotic stress on V-ATPase and V-PPase in leaves of the halophyte Suaeda salsa. J Exp Bot 52:2355–2365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Watanabe S, Kojima K, Ide Y, Sasaki S (2000) Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Woodward AJ, Bennett IJ (2005) The effect of salt stress and abscisic acid on proline production, chlorophyll content and growth of in vitro propagated shoots of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 82:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yokota S (2003) Relationship between salt tolerance and proline accumulation in Australian acacia species. J Forest Res 8:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhu B, Su J, Chang M, Verma DPS, Fan YL, Wu R (1998) Overexpression of a Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene and analysis of tolerance to water- and salt-stress in transgenic rice. Plant Sci 139:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA)PathumthaniThailand

Personalised recommendations