New Forests

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 261–271 | Cite as

Improving drought tolerance of Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings by arbuscular mycorrhizas under glasshouse conditions

  • Y. Zhang
  • C. L. ZhongEmail author
  • Y. Chen
  • Z. Chen
  • Q. B. Jiang
  • C. Wu
  • K. Pinyopusarerk


Effects of mycorrhizal association on improving tolerance of host plant under stress environments have received attentions in recent years. In this paper, six isolates of AMF (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus) were inoculated to Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings under glasshouse conditions to investigate the effects of AMF on growth and drought tolerance of host plants. All the six isolates which belong to Glomus showed high mycorrhizal colonization (88.5–96.0%) with C. equisetifolia seedlings. Seedlings were subjected to drought stress without watering for 7 days and survival of the seedlings inoculated with Glomus caledonium Gc90068, G. versiforme Gv9004 and G. caledonium Gc90036 increased by 36.6, 23.3 and 16.6%, respectively compared with uninoculated seedlings. Limited influence of AMF on seedling height growth was found, but the effects of AMF on total biomass increment were very significant; the increment ranged from 25.7 to 118.9% compared with uninoculated treatment, and it was noted that AMF exerted more influences on root biomass than shoot biomass. Based on the changes in physiological and biochemical parameters among different treatments caused by drought stress, it was concluded that AM (arbuscular mycorrhizal) associations improve the drought tolerance of C. equisetifolia seedlings by means of some physiological and biochemical responses, such as lowering permeability of plasma membrane and MDA (malondialdehyde) contents, enhancing concentrations of P nutrition, soluble sugar, soluble protein and activities of POX (Peroxidase) of C. equisetifolia seedlings.


Arbuscular mycorrhiza Casuarina equisetifolia Physiological and biochemical responses Drought tolerance 



This study was financially supported by the International Foundation for Science (IFS grant No. D/3691-1), Youth Foundation of research Institute of Tropical Forestry (2007-24), the 11th National Five-Year Plan for Forestry Projects (2006BAD01A1605), the 863 Program (2002AA241091) and Ministry of Science and Technology’s Extension Program (2007GB24320424). AMF isolates of G. mosseae, G. etunicatum and G. intraradices were kindly provided by Prof. Wang Youshan, Plant Nutrition and Resource Institute, Agriculture and Forestry Academy of Beijing, China. Mr Aljoy Abarquez of CSIRO Plant Industry, Australia was thanked for his valuable comments on early draft of the manuscript.


  1. Arji I, Arzani K (2008) Effect of water stress on some biochemical changes in leaf of five olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Acta Hortic 791(2):523–526Google Scholar
  2. Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T, Malajczuk N (1996) Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monogr 32:373Google Scholar
  3. Caravaca F, Barea JM, Palenzuela J, Figueroa D, Alguacil MM, Roldan A (2003) Establishment of shrub species in a degraded semiarid site after inoculation with native or allochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Soil Ecol 22(2):103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung HH, Liu SC (1986) Frankia and endomycorrhizae association in coastal windbreaks plantation of casuarina, proceedings of 18th IUFRO world congress, Div 2, Vol II. Forest Plant and Forest Protection 455–468 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuenca G, Andrade ZD, Escalante G (1997) Arbuscular mycorrhizae in the rehabilitation of fragile degraded tropical lands. Biol Fertil Soils 26(2):107–111. doi: 10.1007/s003740050351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhindsa RS (1991) Drought stress, enzymes of glutathione metabolism, oxidation injury, and protein synthesis in Tortula ruralis. Plant Physiol 95(2):648–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Estaún V, Savé R, Biel C (1997) AM inoculation as a biological tool to improve plant revegetation of a disturbed soil with Rosmarinus officinalis under semi-arid conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 6:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fales FW (1951) The assimilation and degradation of carbohydrates by yeast cells. J Biol Chem 193(1):113–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner WK, Parbery DG, Barber DA (1986) The acquisition of phosphorus by lupinus albus L. I. Some characteristics of the soil/root interface. Plant Soil 68:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hao ZB, Chang Z, Xu Z (2004) Experiment Guide of Plant Physiology (in Chinese) Haerbin Industrial University Press, Haerbin, p 115Google Scholar
  11. Khan AG (1993) Occurrence and importance of mycorrhizae in aquatic trees of New South Wales, Australia. Mycorrhiza 3:31–38. doi: 10.1007/BF00213465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McLeod S (1982) Routine analytical method in notes on soil techniques No. 4 CSIRO division of soils, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukerji KG, Kapoor A (1986) Occurrence and importance of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in semiarid regions of India. For Ecol Manage 16:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelsen CE, Safir GnR (1982) Increased drought tolerance of mycorrhizal onion plants caused by improved phosphorus nutrition. Planta 154(5):407–413. doi: 10.1007/BF01267807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pacovsky RS, Fuller G, Paul EA (1985) Influence of soil on the interactions between endo-mycorrhizae and Azospirillum on sorghum. Soil Biol Biochem 17:521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pinyopusarerk K, Kalinganire A, Williams ER, Aken KM (2004) Evaluation of international provenance trials of Casuarina equisetifolia. ACIAR technical reports canberra, No. 58 p 9Google Scholar
  17. Raju PS, Clark RB, Ellis JR (1990) Effects of species of VA-mycorrhizal fungi on growth and mineral uptake of sorghum at different temperatures. Plant Soil 121:165–170. doi: 10.1007/BF00012308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raman N, Elumalai S (1991) Studies of mycorrhizal and actinorhizal association in Casuarina equisetifolia in Coramandel coastal region. J Trop For 7:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reddell P, Bowen GD, Robson AD (1986) Nodulation of Casurinaceae in relation to host species and soil properties. Aust J Bot 34(4):435–444. doi: 10.1071/BT9860435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Requena N, Estefania PS, Concepcion AA et al (2001) Management of indigenous plant-microbe symbioses aids restoration of desertified ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(2):495–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose SL (1980) Mycorrhizal associations of some actinomycete nodulated nitrogen-fixing plants. Can J Bot 58(13):1449–1454. doi: 10.1139/b80-176 Google Scholar
  22. Sambandan K, Kannan K, Raman N (1994) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae of casuarina equisetifolia Forst. in four different soil types in Tamil Nadu. Indian Forester 120(6):510–514Google Scholar
  23. Sidhu OP, Behl HM, Gupta ML, Janardhanan K (1990) Occurrence of VAM in Casuarina equisetifolia L. Curr Sci 59(8):422–423Google Scholar
  24. Tripathy JN, Zhang J, Robin S, Nguyen TT, Nguyen HT (2000) QTLs for cell-membrane stability mapped in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress. Theor Appl Genet 100:1197–1202. doi: 10.1007/s001220051424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Troll W, Lindsley J (1955) A photometric method for the determination of praline. J Biol Chem 215:655–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wright DP, Read DJ, Scholes JD (1998) Mycorrhizal sink strength influences whole plant carbon balance of Trifolium repens L. Plant Cell Environ 21:881–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang J, Kirkham MB (1994) Drought-stress-induced changes in activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase in wheat species. Plant Cell Physiol 35(5):785–791Google Scholar
  28. Zhao SJ, Xu ZC, Zhou C (1994) Improved method of MDA determination in plant tissue. Bulletin of Plant Physiol 30:207–210Google Scholar
  29. Zhong CL, Gong MQ, Lin SQ, Chen Y, Wang FZ (2002) Investigation of AM fungi under casuarina plantations and inoculating experiment for casuarina junghuhnian seedlings. For Res 15(4):427–431Google Scholar
  30. Zwiazek JJ, Blake TJ (1991) Early detection of membrane injury in black spruce (Picea mariana). Can J For Res 21(3):401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Zhang
    • 1
  • C. L. Zhong
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Y. Chen
    • 1
  • Z. Chen
    • 1
  • Q. B. Jiang
    • 1
  • C. Wu
    • 1
  • K. Pinyopusarerk
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute of Tropical ForestryChinese Academy of ForestryGuangzhouThe People’s Republic of China
  2. 2.CSIRO Plant IndustryCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.GuangzhouThe People’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations