Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 237–255 | Cite as

Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States

  • Frederick CubbageEmail author
  • Patricio Mac Donagh
  • José Sawinski Júnior
  • Rafael Rubilar
  • Pablo Donoso
  • Arnaldo Ferreira
  • Vitor Hoeflich
  • Virginia Morales Olmos
  • Gustavo Ferreira
  • Gustavo Balmelli
  • Jacek Siry
  • Mirta Noemi Báez
  • José Alvarez
Original paper

Abstract

Timber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land.

Keywords

Financial analyses Forest plantations Native forests Latin America Biological and financial risk 

References

  1. Binkley C (1997) Preserving nature through intensive plantation forestry: the case for forestland allocation with illustrations from British Columbia. For Chron 73(5):553–559Google Scholar
  2. Brealey RA, Myers SC (1991) Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown C (1998) Global forest products outlook study: thematic study on plantations. Consulting Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 80 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Carle J, Vuorinen P, Del Lungo A (2002) Status and trends in global forest plantation development. For Products J 52(7/8):12–23Google Scholar
  5. Carrere R, Lohmann L (1996) Pulping the South: industrial tree plantations and the world paper economy. Zed Books Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cossalter C, Pye-Smith C (2003) Fast-wood forestry: myths and realities. Center for International Forestry Research. Bogor, Barat, Indonesia. Accessed at: http://www.cifor.cigar.org. November 20, 2003Google Scholar
  7. Davis LS, Johnson KN, Bettinger PS, Howard TA (2001) Forest management. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Deloitte (2005) Country snapshots. Accessed at: http://www.deloitte.com/dtt. 23 May 2005Google Scholar
  9. DiNicola A, Jones DJ, Gray G (1997) Opportunities for forestry investment in Asia and the Pacific through carbon offset initiatives. Asia-pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper No. 29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. Economic Intelligence Unit (2005) Overview: country risk ratings: scores for March 2005 compared with December 2004. Accessed at: http://store.eiu.com. 23 May 2005Google Scholar
  11. Egan L (2005) Tiny Uruguay pressed by neighbor to halt pulp mills. Environmental News Network. Accessed at: http://www.enn.com/today.html?id=8478. 17 August 2005Google Scholar
  12. Evans J, Turnbull J (2004) Plantation forestry in the tropics, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, 467 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2001) Global forest resources assessment 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jspGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO (2003) State of the world’s forests, 2003. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 243 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (2005) Global forest resource assessment. Accessed at: www.fao.org/forestry/index.jsp. 23 July 2006Google Scholar
  16. Klemperer D (1996) Forest resource economics and finance. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory RG (1987) Resource Economics for Foresters. John Wiley. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. IADB (2005) Inversión directa en negocios forestales sostenibles. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Accessed at: http://www.iadb.org/regions/re2/forestal/id/home-id.htm. 21 June 2005Google Scholar
  19. Lamprecht H (1990) Silvicultura en los Trópicos. Duetsche Geseltschaft fur Technische Zusummenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Cooperación Técnica–República Federal de Alemania. Eschborn. 335 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Oyarzún C, Aracena C, Rutherfod P, Godoy R, Deschrijver A (2006) Effect of land use conversion from native forests to exotic plantations on streamwater quality in southern Chile. Water, Air, Soil Pollution (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Pandey D, Ball J (1998) The role of industrial plantations in future global fibre supply. Unasylva 193:37–43Google Scholar
  22. Riegelhauppt E, Burkart R (2002) El uso madero sustentable de Selva Misionera. In: La Selva Misionera: Opciones para su Conservación y Uso Sustentable. Fundación para Conservación de las Especies y Medioambiente. Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp 73–90Google Scholar
  23. Rivero L, Buffe N, Pascaul N, Mac Donagh P, Toma T (2004) Tree growth after selective harvesting in the Guarani Reserve, Misiones. In: 11 h Technical Meeting, Forest and Environment. Eldorado, MisionesGoogle Scholar
  24. Roise JP, Cubbage FW, Abt RC, Siry JP (2000) Regulation of timber yield for sustainable management of industrial forest plantations: theory and practice. In: Klaus van Gadow (ed) Sustainable forest management. Elsevier, pp 217–255Google Scholar
  25. Sayer J, Chokkalingam U, Poulsen K (2001) The restoration of forest biodiversity and ecological values. In: International seminar on restoration research on degraded forest ecosystems. Seoul, Korea. 10 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Sedjo RA (1983) The comparative economics of plantation forestry: a global assessment. Resources for the Future. Johns Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  27. Sedjo RA (1999) The potential of high-yield forestry for meeting timber needs. New For 17:339–359Google Scholar
  28. Sedjo RA (2001) The role of forest plantations in the world’s future timber supply. For Chron 77(2):221–225Google Scholar
  29. Sedjo R, Botkin D (1997) Using forest plantations to spare natural forests. Environment 39(10):14–20Google Scholar
  30. Siry JP, Cubbage FW, Rukunuddin Ahmed M (2005) Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. J For Policy Econ 7(4):551–561Google Scholar
  31. Smith WB, Vissage JS, Darr DR, Sheffield RM (2001) Forest resources of the United States, 1997. General Technical Report NC-219. St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, 190 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. General Technical Report NC-241. St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, 137 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomberlin D, Buongiorno J (2001) Timber plantations, timber supply, and forest conservation. In: Palo M, Uusivuori J, Mery G (eds) World forests, markets, and polices world forests volume III. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 85–94Google Scholar
  34. Uruguay Dirección Forestal (1995) Uruguayan forestry: environmentally friendly and profitable—investment opportunities. República Oriental del Uruguay, Ministerio de Ganaderia Agricultura y Pesca, Dirección General de Recursos Naturales Renovables, 40 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Wadsworth FH (1997) Forest production for tropical America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Agriculture handbook 710. Washington, DC, 563 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Yahoo Noticias (2005) Argentina es el país de mayor desarollo de América Latina, según Informe PNUD. Accessed at: http://ar.news.yahoo.com/050907/7/khl8.html. 8 September 2005Google Scholar
  37. Yahoo Noticias (2006) Cumbre Vásquez-Kirchner por plantas celulosa. Accessed at: http://ar.news.yahoo.com/060327/4/ps6y.html. 27 March 2006Google Scholar
  38. Zinkhan FC, Cubbage FW (2003) Financial analysis of timber investments. In: Sills EO, Abt KL (eds) Forests in a market economy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 77–95Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick Cubbage
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patricio Mac Donagh
    • 2
  • José Sawinski Júnior
    • 3
  • Rafael Rubilar
    • 4
  • Pablo Donoso
    • 5
  • Arnaldo Ferreira
    • 6
  • Vitor Hoeflich
    • 7
  • Virginia Morales Olmos
    • 9
  • Gustavo Ferreira
    • 8
  • Gustavo Balmelli
    • 8
  • Jacek Siry
    • 9
  • Mirta Noemi Báez
    • 2
  • José Alvarez
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Environmental ResourcesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM)EldoradoArgentina
  3. 3.Universidade do Contestado-CanoinhasCanoinhasBrazil
  4. 4.Universidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  5. 5.Universidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  6. 6.Consultant, Forest GeneticsLos AngelesUSA
  7. 7.Embrapa Florestas and Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)Brazil CuritibaBrazil
  8. 8.Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA)TacuaremboUruguay
  9. 9.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  10. 10.CMPC ForestryConcepciónChile

Personalised recommendations