New Forests

, Volume 30, Issue 2–3, pp 295–311 | Cite as

Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance

Article

Abstract.

With over 1.5 billion forest tree seedlings produced annually in the USA, seedling quality assessment is critical to ensure reforestation success. While height and root-collar diameter are the most common traits evaluated during seedling quality assessment, above-ground morphology is not always an accurate predictor of performance after outplanting. Root system morphology and physiological status may provide a more accurate indication of seedling potential. However, relatively few studies have attempted to quantitatively assess root system quality in relation to outplanting success. Large root volume, high root fibrosity, and an increased number of first-order lateral roots have shown some correlation to improved field performance. Physiological seedling quality assessment is commonly practiced through evaluation of root growth potential. Other tests, such as root electrolyte leakage, have also shown some potential as measures of seedling physiological quality. This review identifies current methods of assessing seedling root system quality and discusses potential shortcomings of these methods. An increased understanding of the suitability of current tests, coupled with the development of new tests and multiple parameter relationships, may foster the development of species and site-specific targets for seedling root system quality assessment. The production of seedlings with root systems that meet high morphological and physiological standards better enables seedlings to rapidly establish and thrive upon outplanting.

Keywords

Electrolyte leakage Root fibrosity Root growth potential Root volume Seedling quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aphalo, P., Rikala, R. 2003Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volumeNew Forest2493108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, M.A., Struve, D.K. 1993Root distribution and mineral uptake of coarse-rooted trees grown in cupric hydroxide-treated containersHortSci.28988992Google Scholar
  3. Bayley, A.D., Kietzka, J.W. 1997Stock quality and field performance of Pinus patula seedlings produced under two nursery growing regimes during seven different nursery production periodsNew Forest13341356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BCMOF. 2001. Effects of stock type on seedling performance in the northern interior of British Columbia: twenty year results. Silviculture Note 29. British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
  5. Bigras, F.J., D’Aoust, A.L. 1993Influence of photoperiod on shoot and root frost tolerance and bud phenology of white spruce seedlings (Picea glauca)Can. J. For. Res.23219228Google Scholar
  6. Bigras, F.J., Margolis, H.A. 1997Shoot and root sensitivity of containerized black sprucewhite spruceand jack pine seedlings to late fall freezingNew Forest132949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder W.D., Scagel R.K. and Krumlik G.J. 1988. Root growth potential: facts, myths, value? In: Landis T.D. (tech. coord.), Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA For. Ser., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167, 227 p.Google Scholar
  8. Bouma, T.J., Nielson, K.L., Koutstaal, B. 2000Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerized analysis of root length and diameterPlant Soil218185196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brissette, J.C. 1991

    Development and function of the root systems of southern pine nursery stock

    Proceedings of the Southern Forest Nursery AssociationMississippi Forestry CommissionBiloxiMS Jackson, MS6781
    Google Scholar
  10. Burdett, A.N. 1979A nondestructive method for measuring the volume of intact plant partsCan. J. For. Res.9120122Google Scholar
  11. Burdett, A.N. 1987Understanding root growth capacity: theoretical considerations in assessing planting stock quality by means of root growth testsCan. J. For. Res.17768775Google Scholar
  12. Burdett, A.N. 1990Physiological processes in plantation establishment and development of specification for forest planting stockCan. J. For. Res.20415427Google Scholar
  13. Burdett, A.N., Simpson, D.G., Thompson, C.F. 1983Root development and plantation establishment successPlant Soil71103110Google Scholar
  14. Burdett, A.N., Herring, L.J., Thompson, C.F. 1984Early growth of planted spruceCan. J.␣For. Res.14644651Google Scholar
  15. Burr K.E. 1990. The target seedling concept: bud dormancy and cold hardiness. In: Rose R., Cambell S.J. and Landis T.D. Proceedings of the Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA For. Ser., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Gen Tec. Rep. RM-200, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
  16. Burr, K.E., Tinus, R.W., Wallner, S.J., King, R.M. 1990Comparison of three cold hardiness tests for conifer seedlingsTree Phys.6351369Google Scholar
  17. Canham, C.D., Kobe, R.K., Latty, E.F., Chazdon, R.L. 1999Interspecific and intraspecific variation in tree seedling survival: effects of allocation to roots versus carbohydrate reservesOecologia121111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlson, W.C. 1986Root system considerations in the quality of loblolly pine seedlingsSouth. J.␣Appl. For.108792Google Scholar
  19. Chavasse, C.G.R. 1977The significance of planting height as an indicator of subsequent seedling growthNew Zeal. J. For.22283296Google Scholar
  20. Chiatante, D., Di Iorio, A., Scippa, G.S., Sarnataro, M. 2002Improving vigour assessment of pine (Pinus nigra Arnold)Plant Biosyst.136209216Google Scholar
  21. Columbo, S.J., Glerum, C. 1984Winter injury to shoots as it affects root activity in black spruce container seedlingsCan. J. For. Res.143132Google Scholar
  22. Costa, C., Dwyer, L.M., Hamal, C., Muamba, D.F., Wang, X.L., Nantais, L., Smith, D.L. 2001Root contrast enhancement for measurement with optical scanner-based image analysisCan. J. Bot.792329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crunkilton, D.D., Pallardy, S.G., Garrett, H.E. 1992Water relations and gas exchange of northern red oak seedlings planted in a central Missouri clearcut and shelterwoodFor. Ecol. Manage.53117129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis A.S. 2003. Performance of northern red oak under adverse conditions. MS Thesis. Purdue University, 111 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Deans, J.D., Lundberg, C., Cannell, M.G.R., Murray, M.B., Sheppard, L.J. 1990aRoot system fibrosity of Sitka spruce transplants: relationship with root growth potentialForestry6317Google Scholar
  26. Deans, J.D., Lundberg, C., Tabbush, P.M., Cannell, M.G.R., Sheppard, L.J., Murray, M.B. 1990bThe influence of desiccation, rough handling, and cold storage on the quality and establishment of Sitka spruce planting stockForestry63129141Google Scholar
  27. Dey, D.C., Parker, W.C. 1997Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwoodNew Forest14145156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dickson, A., Leaf, A.L., Hosner, J.F. 1960Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseriesFor. Chron.361013Google Scholar
  29. Dixon, R.K., Pallardy, S.G., Garrett, H.E., Cox, G.S. 1983Comparative water relations of container-grown and bare-root ectomycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Quercus velutina seedlingsCan. J. Bot.6115591565Google Scholar
  30. Dunsworth, G.B. 1997Plant quality assessment: an industrial perspectiveNew Forest13431440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duryea, M.L. 1985

    Evaluating seedling quality: importance to reforestation

    Duryea, M.L. eds. Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major TestsForest Research Laboratory, Oregon State UniversityCorvallis16
    Google Scholar
  32. FAO.2001State of the World’s Forests 2001United NationsRomeItalyGoogle Scholar
  33. Farmer, R.E.,Jr. 1978Seasonal carbohydrate levels in roots of Appalachian hardwood planting stockTree Plantersȁ9 Notes292224Google Scholar
  34. Ferreira Reis, M. das G., Kimmins, J.P. 1986Importancia do sistema radicular no crescimento inicial de brotos de Eucalyptus sppRevista Arvore10196201Google Scholar
  35. Folk, R.S., Grossnickle, S.C. 1997Determining field performance potential with the use of limiting environmental conditionsNew Forest13121138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Funk, D.T. 1971Pot sizepot shapeand soil mix all influence black walnut seedling growthPlant Propagator171012Google Scholar
  37. Gazal, R.M., Kubiske, M.E. 2004Influence of initial root length on physiological responses of cherrybark oak and Shumard oak seedlings to field drought conditionsFor. Ecol. Manage.189295305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Genere, B., Garriou, D. 1999Stock quality and field performance of Douglas-fir seedlings under varying degrees of water stressAnn. For. Sci.56501510Google Scholar
  39. Genere, B., Garriou, D., Omarzad, O., Grivet, J.P., Hagege, D. 2004Effect of a strong cold storage induced desiccation on metabolic solutes, stock quality and regrowthin seedlings of two oak speciesTrees: Struct. Funct.18559565Google Scholar
  40. Grossnickle S.C. 2005. The importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forest in-press.Google Scholar
  41. Grossnickle, S.C., Folk, R.S. 1993Stock quality assessment: forecasting survival or performance on a reforestation siteTree Planters 9 Notes44113121Google Scholar
  42. Haase, D.L., Rose, R. 1993Soil moisture stress induces transplant shock in stored and unstored 2 + 0 Douglas-fir seedlings of varying root volumeFor. Sci.39275294Google Scholar
  43. Hartley, M.J. 2002Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forestsFor. Ecol. Manage.1558195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hawkins C.D.B. and Binder W.D. 1990. State of the art seedling stock quality tests based on seedling physiology. In: Rose R., Cambell S.J. andLandis T.D. Proceedings of the Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA For. Ser., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Gen Tec. Rep. RM-200, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar
  45. Jacobs, D.F., Rose, R., Haase, D.L., Alzugaray, P.O. 2004Fertilization at planting inhibits root system development and drought avoidance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlingsAnn. For. Sci.61643652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jacobs D.F., Salifu K.F. and Seifert J.R. 2005. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New Forests in press.Google Scholar
  47. Jacobs D.F., Salifu K.F. and Davis A.S. Drought susceptibility and recovery of transplanted Quercus rubra seedlings in relation to root system morphology. 9th Workshop on Seedling Physiology and Growth Problems in Oak Plantings. West LafayetteINUSA 19–20 October 2004, USDA For. Ser., North Central Research Station, in press.Google Scholar
  48. Kainer, K.A., Duryea, M.L. 1990Root wrenching and lifting date of slash pine: effects on morphology, survival, and growthNew Forest4207221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kormanik, P.P. 1986Lateral root morphology as an expression of sweetgum seedling qualityFor. Sci.32595604Google Scholar
  50. Larson, M.M. 1975Pruning northern red oak seedlings: effects on root regeneration and early growthCan. J. For. Res.5381386Google Scholar
  51. Larsen, H.S., South, D.B., Boyer, J.M. 1986Root growth potential, seedling morphology and bud dormancy correlate with survival of loblolly pine seedlings planted in December in AlabamaTree Phys.1253263Google Scholar
  52. Levy, P.E., McKay, H.M. 2003Assessing tree seedling vitality tests using sensitivity analysis of a process-based growth modelFor. Ecol. Manage.1837793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lopushinsky W. and Beebe T. 1976. Relationship of shoot–root ratio to survival and growth of outplanted Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine seedlings. USDA For. Ser. Research NotePacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station PNW-274, 7 p.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall, J.D. 1985

    Carbohydrate status as a measure of seedling quality

    Duryea, M.L. eds. Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major TestsForest Research Laboratory, Oregon State UniversityCorvallis4958
    Google Scholar
  55. Mattsson, A. 1997Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessmentNew Forest13227252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McKay, H.M. 1992Electrolyte leakage from fine roots of conifer seedlings: a rapid index of plant vitality following cold storageCan. J. For. Res.2213711377Google Scholar
  57. McKay, H.M. 1997A review of the effect of stresses between lifting and planting on nursery stock quality and performanceNew Forest13369399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McKay, H.M. 1998Root electrolyte leakage and root growth potential as indicators of spruce and larch establishmentSilva Fenn.32241252Google Scholar
  59. McKay, H.M, White, I.M.S. 1997Fine root electrolyte leakage and moisture content: indices␣of Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir seedling performance after desiccationNew Forest13139162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller S. 1999. Successful tree planting techniques for drastically disturbed lands: a case study of the propagation and planting of container-grown oak and nut trees in Missouri. In: Vories K.C. and Throgmorton D. Proceedings of Enhancement of Reforestation at Surface Coal Mines: Technical Interactive ForumUS Department of InteriorOffice of Surface Mining, Alton, Illinois and Coal Research CenterUniversity of Southern Illinois, CarbondaleIllinois, pp. 157–172.Google Scholar
  61. Mohammed, G.H. 1997The status and future of stock quality testingNew Forest13491514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morrison, I.K., Armson, K.A. 1968The Rhizometer – a new device for measuring roots of tree seedlingsFor. Chron.442123Google Scholar
  63. Nambiar, E.K.S. 1980Root configuration and root regeneration of Pinus radiata seedlingsNew Zeal. J. For. Sci.10249263Google Scholar
  64. Nambiar, E.K.S., Sands, R. 1993Competition for water and nutrients in forestsCan. J. For. Res.2319551968Google Scholar
  65. Noland, T.L., Mohammed, G.H., Wagner, R.G. 2001Morphological characteristics associated with tolerance to competition from herbaceous vegetation for seedlings of jack pineblack spruceand white pineNew Forest21199215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. O’Reilly, C., Harper, C., Keane, M. 2002Influence of physiological condition at the time of lifting on the cold storage tolerance and field performance of ash and sycamoreForestry75112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pandey, D., Ball, J. 1998The role of industrial plantations in future global fibre suppliesUnasylva1933743Google Scholar
  68. Ponder, F.,Jr. 2000Survival and growth of planted hardwoods in harvested openings with first-order lateral root differences, root dipping, and tree sheltersNorth. J. Appl. For.174550Google Scholar
  69. Puttonen, P. 1989Criteria for using seedling performance potential testsNew Forest36787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Puttonen, P. 1997Looking for the 8 silver bullet 9 – can one test do it all?New Forest13927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Racey, G.D., Glerum, C., Hutchinson, R.E. 1983The practicality of top-root ratio in nursery stock characterizationFor. Chron.59240243Google Scholar
  72. Racey, G.D. 1985A comparison of plating stock characterization with root area index, volumeand dry weightFor. Chron.616470Google Scholar
  73. Radoglou, K., Raftoyannis, Y. 2001Effects of desiccation and freezing on vitality and field performance of broadleaved tree speciesAnn. For. Sci.585968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Radoglou, K., Raftoyannis, Y. 2002The impact of storagedesiccation and planting date on seedling quality and survival of woody plant speciesForestry75179190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rietveld, W.J. 1989Transplanting stress in bareroot conifer seedlings: its development and progression to establishmentNorth. J. Appl. For.699107Google Scholar
  76. Rigney, M.P., Kranzler, G.A. 1997Machine vision for conifer seedling quality controlNew Forest135162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ritchie, G.A., Dunlap, J.R. 1980Root growth potential – its development and expression in forest tree seedlingsNew Zeal. J. For. Sci.10218248Google Scholar
  78. Ritchie, G.A. 1984

    Assessing seedling quality

    Duryea, M.L.Landis, T.D. eds. Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot SeedlingsForest Research Laboratory, Oregon State UniversityCorvallis243259
    Google Scholar
  79. Rose R., Carlson W.C. and Morgan P. 1990. The target seedling concept. In: Rose R., Cambell S.J. and Landis T.D. Proceedings of the Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA For. Ser., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Gen Tec. Rep. RM-200, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  80. Rose, R., Atkinson, M., Gleason, J., Sabin, T. 1991aRoot volume as a grading criterion to improve field performance of Douglas-fir seedlingsNew Forest5195209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rose, R., Gleason, J., Atkinson, M., Sabin, T. 1991bGrading ponderosa pine seedlings for outplanting according to their root volumeWestern J. Appl. For.61115Google Scholar
  82. Rose, R., Atkinson, M., Gleason, J., Haase, D. 1992Nursery morphology and preliminary comparison of 3-year field performance of 1 + 0 and 2 + 0 bareroot ponderosa pine seedlingsTree Planters 9 Notes43153158Google Scholar
  83. Rose, R., Haase, D.L., Kroiher, F., Sabin, T. 1997Root volume and growth of ponderosa pine␣and Douglass-fir seedlings: a summary of eight growing seasonsWestern J. Appl. For.126973Google Scholar
  84. Ruehle J.L. and Kormanik P.P. 1986. Lateral root morphology: a potential indicator of seedling␣quality in northern red oak. USDA For. Ser., Southeastern Forest Exp. Sta., Research Note6 pp.Google Scholar
  85. Salifu, K.F., Timmer, V.R. 2001Nutrient retranslocation response of Picea mariana seedlings to nitrogen supplySoil Sci. Soc. Am. J.65905913Google Scholar
  86. Sampson, P.H., Templeton, C.W.G., Colombo, S.J. 1997An overview of Ontario’s stock quality assessment programNew Forest13469487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schultz, R.C., Thompson, J.R. 1990Nursery cultural practices that improve hardwood seedling root morphologyTree Plantersȁ9 Notes412132Google Scholar
  88. Schultz, R.C., Thompson, J.R. 1997Effect of density control and undercutting on root morphology of 1 + 0 bareroot hardwood seedlings: five-year field performance of root-graded stock in central USANew Forest13297310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Simpson, D.G. 1990Frost hardiness, root growth capacity, and field performance relationships in interior sprucelodgepole pineDouglas-firand western hemlock seedlingsCan. J. For. Res.20566572Google Scholar
  90. Simpson, D.G., Thompson, C.F., Sutherland, C.D. 1994Field performance of interior spruce seedlings: effects of stress treatments and prediction by root growth potential and needle conductanceCan. J. For. Res.24576586Google Scholar
  91. Simpson, D.G., Ritchie, G.A. 1997Does RGP predict field performance? A debateNew Forest13253277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smit-Spinks, B., Swanson, B.T., Markhart, A.H.,III 1985The effect of photoperiod and thermoperiod on cold acclimation and growth of Pinus sylvestrisCan. J. For. Res.15453460Google Scholar
  93. Stone, E.C. 1955Poor survival and the physiological condition of planting stockFor. Sci.19094Google Scholar
  94. Stone, E.C., Schubert, G.H. 1959Root regeneration by ponderosa pine seedlings lifted at different times of the yearFor. Sci.5322332Google Scholar
  95. Stone, E.C., Jenkinson, J.L. 1971Physiological grading of ponderosa pine nursery stockJ. For.693133Google Scholar
  96. Struve, D.K., Joly, R.J. 1992Transplanted red oak seedlings mediate transplant shock by reducing leaf surface area and altering carbon allocationCan. J. For. Res.2214411448Google Scholar
  97. Sundström, E., Keane, M. 1999Root architectureearly development and basal sweep in containerized and bare-rooted Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)Plant Soil2176578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sutton, R.F. 1979Planting stock quality and gradingFor. Ecol. Manage.2123132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sutton, R.F. 1990Root growth capacity in coniferous forest treesHortSci.25259266Google Scholar
  100. Tanaka, Y, Walstad, J.D, Borrecco , J.E. 1976The effect of wrenching on morphology and field performance of Douglas-fir and loblolly pine seedlings Can. J. For. Res.6453458Google Scholar
  101. Tanaka, Y., Brotherton, P., Hostetter, S., Chapman, D., Dyce, S., Belanger, J., Johnson, B., Duke, S. 1997The operational planting stock quality testing program at WeyerhaeuserNew Forest13423437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thompson, B.E. 1985

    Seedling morphological evaluation: what you can tell by looking

    Duryea, M.L. eds. Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Ability of Major TestsOregon State UniversityCorvallis, OR5971
    Google Scholar
  103. Thompson, J.R., Schultz, R.C. 1995Root system morphology of Quercus rubra L. planting stock and 3-year field performance in IowaNew Forest9225236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. USDA-FS. 1999. Tree planting in the US. Available online at: http://www.rngr.net/Reforestation/tpusGoogle Scholar
  105. von den Driessche, R. 1983Growthsurvival, and physiology of Douglas-fir seedlings following root wrenching and fertilizationCan. J. For. Res.13270278Google Scholar
  106. van den Driessche, R. 1987Importance of current photosynthate to new root growth in planted conifer seedlingsCan. J. For. Res.17776782Google Scholar
  107. Vyse, A. 1981Growth of young spruce plantations in interior British ColumbiaFor. Chron.57174180Google Scholar
  108. Wakeley, P.C. 1949

    Physiologic grades of southern pine nursery stock

    Shirley, H.L. eds. Proceedings of the 1948 Society of American Foresters Annual ConventionBoston, MAUSA
    Google Scholar
  109. Ward, J.S., Gent, M.P.N., Stephens, G.R. 2000Effects of planting stock quality and browse protection-type on height growth of northern red oak and eastern white pineFor. Ecol. Manage.127205216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Williams, H.M., South, D.B., Webb, A. 1988Effects of fall irrigation on morphology and root growth potential of loblolly pine seedlings growing in sandSouth Afr. For. J.14715Google Scholar
  111. Wilson B.C. and Jacobs D.F. 2004. Electrolyte leakage from stem tissue as an indicator of hardwood seedling physiological status and hardiness 2004. In: Yaussy D.A., Hix D.M., Long R.P. and Goebel P.C. Proceedings, 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. USDA For. Ser., Northeastern Res. Stn., Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-316, pp. 373–380.Google Scholar
  112. Wulster, G.J. 1985A nondestructive method for measuring root system areaHortSci.2010581060Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesHardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations