Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 97–112 | Cite as

Field Performance of Pinus radiata D. Don Produced in Nursery with Different Types of Containers

  • U. Ortega
  • J. Majada
  • A. Mena-Petite
  • J. Sanchez-Zabala
  • N. Rodriguez-Iturrizar
  • K. Txarterina
  • J. Azpitarte
  • M. Duñabeitia
Article

Abstract

We have studied the development in nurseries of containerized Pinus radiata produced with different container systems in order to choose the most suitable system for producing well-balanced plants with an optimal root system. At the end of the production period, significant differences were found in morphological responses among the seedlings to the various container characteristics. Seedlings grown in containers that permitted lateral air puning presented less growth and lower biomass production. However, root deformations were more frequent and severe in plants produced in closed-wall containers. Field performance was likewise mainly affected by container type and plant growth rate, as faster grown plants showed more problems of stability than plants with a balanced root and stem development.

Keywords

Root architecture Root deformations Toppling Seedling Plantation establishment Stock types 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aimers-Halliday J., Holden G., Klomp B. and Menzies M. 1999. Soften the blow – planted age cutting on topple-prone sites. What’s New in Forest research, No. 248. New Zeal. For. Res. Inst. LtdGoogle Scholar
  2. Auberlinger V. 1982. De l’instabilité du Pin maritime. Afocel Annales, pp.139–176.Google Scholar
  3. Balisky, A.C., Salonius, P., Walli, C., Brinkman, D. 1995Seedling roots and forest floor: misplaced and neglected aspects of British Columbia’s reforestation effortFor. Chron.715965Google Scholar
  4. Balneaves, J.M., DeLaMare, P.J. 1989Root patterns of Pinus radiata on five ripping treatments in a Canterbury forestNew Zeal. J. For. Sci.192940Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, J.P., Brissette, J.C. 1986Producing southern pine seedlings in containers. U.S.D.A Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. StaU.S.D.A Forest ServNew Orleans, La72Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-59.Google Scholar
  6. Bedford L., Martin P. and Scagel R. 1996. Bednesti Site: Testing the biological effectiveness of mechanical site preparation equipment (Preliminary results). Tour of Bednesti, September 24. BCMOF/CFS FRDA II, pp. 109.Google Scholar
  7. Burdett, A.N., Coates, H., Eremko, R., Martin, P.A.F. 1986Toppling in British Columbia’s lodgepole pine plantations: significancecause and preventionFor. Chron.62433439Google Scholar
  8. Carlyle, J.C., Turvey, N.D., Hopmans, P., Downes, G.M. 1989Stem deformation in Pinus radiata associated with previous land useCan. J. For. Res.1996105Google Scholar
  9. Coutts, M.P. 1983Root architecture and tree stabilityPlant and Soil71171188Google Scholar
  10. Coutts, M.P. 1987Developmental process in tree root systemCan. J. For. Res.17761770Google Scholar
  11. Coutts, M.P. 1989Factors affecting the direction of growth of tree rootsAnn. Sci. For.46277287Google Scholar
  12. Coutts, M.P., Nielsen, C.N., Nicoll, B.C. 1999The development of symmetry, rigidity and anchorage in the structural root system of conifersPlant and Soil217115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cremiere L. 1994. Conteneurs: Quelles consequences pour le Pin maritime. Afocel Fiche Informations-Foret. N° 477.Google Scholar
  14. Gautam, M., Mead, D.J., Frampton, C., Chang, S.X. 1999Coarse root system characteristics and toppling of clonal and seedlings trees of Pinus radiata on Canterbury PlainsNew Zeal. J. For. Sci.441518Google Scholar
  15. Gautam, M.K., Chang, S.X., Mead, D.J., Clinton, P.W., Roberts, E.H. 2003aFirst order lateral root characteristics reflect the competitiveness of radiate pine genotypes in agroforestry systemsAustralasia Forestry ConferenceQueenstown, New Zealand2003110AprilGoogle Scholar
  16. Gautam, M.K., Mead, D.J., Clinton, P.W., Chang, S.X. 2003bBiomass and morphology of Pinus radiata coarse root components in temperate silvopastoral systemsFor. Ecol. Man.177387397Google Scholar
  17. Halter, M.R., Chanway, C.P., Harper, G.J. 1993Growth reduction and root deformation of containerised lodgepole pine saplings 11 years after plantingFor. Ecol. Man.56131146Google Scholar
  18. Harrington, C.A., Brissette, J.C., Carbon, W.C. 1989Root system structure in planted and seeded loblolly and shortleaf pineFor. Sci.35469480Google Scholar
  19. Lamhamedi, M.S., Bernier, P.Y., Hebert, C., Jobidon, R. 1998Physiological and growth responses of three sizes of containerized of Picea mariana seedlings outplanted with and without vegetation controlFor. Ecol. Man.1101323Google Scholar
  20. Landis, D., Tinus, R.W., Mc Donald, S.E., Barnett, J.P. 1990Containers and growing media. Vol.2. The container tree nursery manual. Agriculture Handbook 674US Department of AgricultureForest ServiceWashington, DC87Google Scholar
  21. Lindström, A. 1994Stability of young container pine standsCanadian Silviculture Magazine21620Google Scholar
  22. Lindström, A., Håkansson, L. 1995Going to the root of the evilCanadian Silviculture Magazine31417Google Scholar
  23. Lindström, A., Rune, G. 1999Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: effects on root growthtree stability and stem straightnessPlant and Soil2172937Google Scholar
  24. Long, A.J. 1991Proper planting improves performanceDuryea, M.L.Dougherty, P.M. eds. Forest Regeneration ManualKluwer Academic Pub.Dordrecht, The Netherlands303320Google Scholar
  25. Mason, E.G. 1985Causes of juvenile instability of Pinus radiata in New ZealandNew Zeal. J. For. Sci.1523628Google Scholar
  26. Mason, E.G., Sputh, D.B., Weizhong, Z. 1996Performance of Pinus radiata in relation to seedling gradeweed control, and soil cultivation in the central North Island of New ZealandNew Zeal. J. For. Sci.26173183Google Scholar
  27. McMinn R.G. 1978. Root development of white spruce and lodgepole pine seedlings following outplanting. In: Van Eerden E. and Kinghorn J.M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Root Form of Planted Trees Symposium, May 16–19, 1978, Victoria B.C.. B.C. Min. For./CFS Joint Rep. No.8, pp. 186–190.Google Scholar
  28. Melanie, D.J., Kiiskila, S., Flanagan, A. 2002Field performance of pine stock types: Two-year results of a trial on interior lodgepole pine seedlings grown in StyroblocksTMCopperblocksTMor AirBlocksTMB. C. Journal of Ecosystems and Management2112Google Scholar
  29. Moore, J., Somerville, A. 1998Assessing the risk of wind damage to plantation forests in New ZealandNew Zeal. For.432529Google Scholar
  30. Nambiar, S. 1984Significance of first order lateral roots on the growth of young radiata pine under environmental stressAus. For. Res.14187199Google Scholar
  31. Nicoll, B.C., Easton, E.P., Milner, A.D., Walker, C., Coutts, M.P. 1995Wind stability factors in tree selection; Distribution of biomass within root system of Sitka spruce clonesCoutts, M.P.Graace, J. eds. Wind and TreesCambridge University PressCambride, UK276292Google Scholar
  32. Nicoll, B.C., Ray, D. 1996Adaptative growth of the root systems in response to wind action and site conditionsTree Physiol.16891898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen, C.N. 1992Will traditional conifer tree breeding for enhanced stem production reduce wind stability?Silvae Genetica41307318Google Scholar
  34. Nielsen, C.N. 1997The calculation module for structural roots in the TREEARCH-databaseThe Arboretum, Royal Vet. Agric. Univ.CopenhagenInternal report8.Google Scholar
  35. Ortega U., Rodríguez N., González-Murua C., Majada J., Azpitarte I., Txarterina K. and Duñabeitia M. 2001. Estudio de la calidad de planta de Pinus radiata en envase. In: Montes para la sociedad del Nuevo Milenio. III Congreso Forestal Español Vol. III.. Junta de Andalucía. SE-2499–2001. Consejería de Medio Ambiente.III pp.354–359.Google Scholar
  36. Salonius P., Beaton K. and Roze B. 2000. Effects of cell size and spacing on root density and field performance of container-reared black spruce. Can. For. Servo.- Atl. For. Ctr. Inf. Rep. M-X-208E, pp. 21.Google Scholar
  37. Schultz, R.C., Thompson, J.R. 1997Effect of density control and undercutting on root morphology of 1 + 0 bareroot hardwood seedlings: five-year field performance of root-graded stock in the central USANew Forests13301314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soil Survey Staff. 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 8th ed. Natural Resources Conservation ServiceUnited States Department of AgricultureWashington, DC.Google Scholar
  39. South, D.B. 1999Which loblolly pine seedling has a higher survival potential a deep planted J-root or a shallow planted I-root?’ February’Tenth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research ConferenceShreveport, LA1618Google Scholar
  40. Stokes, A., Nicoll, B.C., Coutts, M.P., Fitter, A.H. 1997Responses of young Sitka spruce clones to mechanical perturbation and nutrition: effects on biomass allocation, root development and resistance to bendingCan. J. For. Res.2710491057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sundström, E., Keane, M. 1999Root architectureearly development and basal sweep in containerized and bare-rooted Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)Plant and Soil2176578Google Scholar
  42. Theodorou, C., Bowen, G.D. 1993Root morphology, growthand uptake of phosphorous and nitrogen of Pinus radiata families in different soilsFor. Ecol. Man.564356Google Scholar
  43. Turvey, N.D., Downes, G.M., Hopmans, P., Stark, N., Tomkins, B., Rogers, H. 1993Stem deformation in fast grown Pinus radiata: an investigation of causesFor. Ecol. Man.62189209Google Scholar
  44. Watson, A.J., Tombleson, J.D. 2002Toppling in juvenile pines: A comparison of the root system characteristics of direct-sown seedlings, and bare-root seedlings and cuttingsPlant and Soil239187196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Ortega
    • 1
  • J. Majada
    • 2
  • A. Mena-Petite
    • 1
  • J. Sanchez-Zabala
    • 1
  • N. Rodriguez-Iturrizar
    • 1
  • K. Txarterina
    • 3
  • J. Azpitarte
    • 4
  • M. Duñabeitia
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología vegetal y Ecología. Facultad de CienciasUniversidad del País Vasco/EHU. Apdo.- 644BilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Forestry Section. Grado. SERlDA, Estación Experimental “La Mata” apdo. 13AsturiasSpain
  3. 3.Basalan S.A. Diputación Foral de BizkaiaAvda. Madariaga 1-1a Plta. Dpto. 9BilbaoSpain
  4. 4.Confederación de Forestalistas del País VascoGaldakaoSpain

Personalised recommendations