Changes in Histone H3 Acetylation in the Rat Hippocampus Due to Severe Hypoxia and the Role of Hypoxic Postconditioning

  • O. V. VetrovoyEmail author
  • T. S. Glushchenko
  • K. V. Sariyeva
  • Ye. I. Tyul’kova
  • Ye. A. Rybnikova

Objective. To study the effects of severe hypobaric hypoxia followed by sessions of moderate hypobaric hypoxia using a postconditioning regime (PostC) with neuroprotective properties on the level of acetylation of histone H3 in rat hippocampal neurons. Materials and methods. A quantitative immunocytochemical method was used to study total histone acetylation and histone H3 acetylation at lysine 9 (acH3K9), which influences the conformational properties of chromatin and gene expression in the pyramidal neuron layer in hippocampal field CA1 (n = 84) in response to different hypoxia regimes. Results. Severe harmful hypoxia for four days did not lead to significant changes in the level of acetylation of acH3K9. Moderate hypobaric hypoxia in the PostC regime induced a significant increase in the acH3K9 level one day after the first session, supporting the initiation of adaptive processes induced by PostC. Conclusions. The process of histone acetylation, and particularly acetylation of histone H3, plays an important role in supporting the neuroprotective effect of hypoxic PostC.


hippocampus histone acetylation severe hypoxia hypoxic postconditioning rat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O. V. Vetrovoy, E. A. Rybnikova, T. S. Glushchenko, et al., “Moderate hypobaric hypoxia in a postconditioning regime increases HIF-1α and erythropoietin expression in hippocampal field CA1 in rats subjected to severe hypoxia,” Neirokhimiya, 31, No. 2, 134–139 (2014).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. V. Vetrovoy, E. A. Rybnikova, T. S. Glushchenko, et al., “Effects of hypoxic postconditioning on the expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 and the neurotrophin BDNF in hippocampal fi eld CA1 in rats subjected to severe hypoxia,” Morfologiya, 145, No. 2, 16–20 (2014).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. O. Samoilov, The Brain and Adaptation (molecular-cellular mechanisms), Pavlov Institute of Physiology (1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. A. Stroev, E. I. Tyul’kova, L. A. Vataeva, et al., “Effects of prenatal hypoxia on the expression of thioredoxin-1 in the hippocampus of rats at the early stages of postnatal ontogeny,” Neirokhimiya, 28, No. 3, 226–231 (2011).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Baillieul, S. Chacaroun, S. Doutreleau, et al., “Hypoxic conditioning and the central nervous system: A new therapeutic opportunity for brain and spinal cord injuries?” Exp. Biol. Med., 242, No. 11, 1198–1206 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Gräff, D. Kim, M. M. Dobbin, and L. H. Tsai, “Epigenetic regulation of gene expression in physiological and pathological brain processes,” Physiol. Rev., 91, 603–649 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. B. Johnson and M. C. Barton, “Hypoxia-induced and stressspecifiс changes in chromatin structure and function,” Mutat. Res., 618, No. 1–2, 149–162 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Melvin and S. Rocha, “Chromatin as an oxygen sensor and active player in the hypoxia response,” Cell Signal, 24, No. 1, 35–43 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. I. Perez-Perri, J. M. Acevedo, and P. Wappner, “Epigenetics: new questions on the response to hypoxia,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., 12, 4705–4721 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Samoilov, A. Churilova, T. Gluschenko, et al., “Acetylation of histones in neocortex and hippocampus of rats exposed to different modes of hypobaric hypoxia: implications for brain hypoxic injury and tolerance,” Acta Histochem., 118, No. 2, 80–89 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Schweizer, A. Meisel, and S. Marschenz, “Epigenetic mechanisms in cerebral ischemia,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 38, 1335–1346 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. M. Stankiewicz, A. H. Swiergiel, and P. Lisowski, “Epigenetics of stress adaptations in the brain,” Brain Res. Bull., 98, 76–92 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. Vetrovoy, E. Tulkova, K. Sariyeva, et al., “Neuroprotective effect of hypobaric hypoxic postconditioning is accompanied by DNA protection and lipid peroxidation changes in rat hippocampus,” Neurosci. Lett., 639, 49–52 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. V. Vetrovoy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • T. S. Glushchenko
    • 1
  • K. V. Sariyeva
    • 1
  • Ye. I. Tyul’kova
    • 1
  • Ye. A. Rybnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for the Regulation of Brain Neuron Functions, Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistrySt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations