Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 49, Issue 8, pp 996–1007 | Cite as

Training of Rhesus Macaques to Complex Cognitive Tasks

  • I. V. BondarEmail author
  • L. N. Vasileva
  • L. V. Tereshchenko
  • A. V. Buynevich
  • A. V. LatanovEmail author

The closeness of the evolutionary origin, physiology, and structure of the brain with humans makes lower primates the preferred experimental animals for biomedical research. Many brain diseases induce degradation of cognitive capacities. Various aspects of impairments to cognitive functions are studied in model experiments in monkeys. In the present article we discuss the theoretical grounds for learning complex tasks by primates and present results from training animals using three different behavioral tasks: an oculomotor task, a visual objects categorization task, and a task for assessment of the retention of motor function on extraction of a bait. The results indicate that these tests can be used simultaneously in one animal. This approach leads to optimization of models for studies of cognitive impairments associated with brain diseases.


lower primates model objects impairments to cognitive functions learning in monkeys categorization eye movements learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asaad, W. F., Santhanam, N., McClellan, S., and Freedman, D. J., “Highperformance execution of psychophysical tasks with complex visual stimuli in MATLAB,” J. Neurophysiol., 109, No. 1, 249–260 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, M., Calapai, A., Stephan, V., et al., “Standardized automated training of rhesus monkeys for neuroscience research in their housing environment,” J. Neurophysiol. (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  3. Brainard, D. H., “The psychophysics toolbox,” Spat. Vis.10, 433–436 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calapai, A., Berger, M., Niessing, M., et al., “A cage-based training, cognitive testing and enrichment system optimized for rhesus macaques in neuroscience research,” Behav. Res. Methods, 49, No. 1, 35–45 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camus, S., Ko, W. K., Pioli, E., and Bezard, E., “Why bother using non-human primate models of cognitive disorders in translational research? Neurobiol,” Learn. Mem., 124, 123–129 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capitanio, J. P. and Emborg, M. E., “Contributions of non-human primates to neuroscience research,” Lancet, 371, No. 9618, 1126–1135 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chelonis, J. J., Cox, A. R., Karr, M. J., et al., “Comparison of delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys and children,” Behav. Processes, 103, 261–268 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiueh, C. C., Markey, S. D., Burns, R. S., et al., “Neurochemical and behavioral effects of MPTP in rat, guinea pig and monkey,” Psychopharmacol. Bull., 20, 548–553 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DeLong, M. R., “Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin,” Trends Neurosci., 13, 281–285 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Didier, E. S., MacLean, A. G., Mohan, M., et al., “Contributions of nonhuman primates to research on aging,” Vet. Pathol., 53, No. 2, 277–290 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Firsov, M. L., “Perspectives for optogenetic prosthetization of the retina,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 5, 53–62 (2017).Google Scholar
  12. Forcelli, P. A., Palchik, G., Leath, T., et al., “Memory loss in a nonnavigational spatial task after hippocampal inactivation in monkeys,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, No. 11, 4315–4320 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldman-Rakic, P. S., “Cellular basis of working memory,” Neuron, 14, 477–485 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanbury, D. B., Peiffer, A. M., Dugan, G., et al., “Long-term cognitive functioning in single-dose total-body gamma-irradiated rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta),” Radiat. Res., 186, No. 5, 447–454 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenner, P., “From the MPTP-treated primate to the treatment of motor complications in Parkinson’s disease,” Parkinsonism Relat. Disord., Suppl. 4, 18–23 (2009).Google Scholar
  16. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., and Pelli, D., “What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3?” Perception, ECVP Abstr, Suppl. (2007).Google Scholar
  17. Kohama, S. G., Renner, L., Landauer, N., et al., “Effect of ovarian hormone therapy on cognition in the aged female rhesus macaque,” J. Neurosci., 36, No. 40, 10416–10424 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langston, J. W., Forno, L. S., Rebert, C. S., and Irwin, I., “Selective nigral toxicity after systemic administration of 1-methyl-4-phenyl 1-1,2,3,6, tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) in the squirrel monkey,” Brain Res., 292, 390–394 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latanov, A. V., Tereshchenko, L. V., Yudin, A. G., and Shul’govskii, V. V., “Residual impairments to operant behavior in monkeys after recovery form MPTP-induced parkinsonism-like syndrome,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 83, No. 12, 159–162 (1997).Google Scholar
  20. Lind, J., Enquist, M., and Ghirlanda, S., “Animal memory: A review of delayed matching-to-sample data,” Behav. Processes, 117, 52–58 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMahon, D. B., Russ, B. E., Elnaiem, H. D., et al., “Single-unit activity during natural vision: diversity, consistency, and spatial sensitivity among AF face patch neurons,” J. Neurosci., 35, No. 14, 5537–5548 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moss, M. B., Killiany, R. J., Lai, Z. C., et al., “Recognition memory span in rhesus monkeys of advanced age,” Neurobiol. Aging, 18, 13–19 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagahara, A. H., Bernot, T., and Tuszynski, M. H., “Age-related cognitive deficits in rhesus monkeys mirror human deficits on an automated test battery,” Neurobiol. Aging, 31, No. 6, 1020–1031 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pelli, D. G., “The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies,” Spat. Vis., 10, 437–442 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips, K. A., Bales, K. L., Capitanio, J. P., et al., “Why primate models matter,” Am. J. Primatol., 76, No. 9, 801–827 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porras, G., Li, Q., and Bezard, E., “Modeling Parkinson’s disease in primates: The MPTP model,” Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 2, a009308 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., and Fogassi, L., “Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions,” Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 3, No. 2, 131–141 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez, J. S. and Paule, M. G., “Working memory delayed response tasks in monkeys,” in: Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience, Buccafusco, J. J. (ed.), C Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2009), 2nd ed.,
  29. Roelfsema, P. R. and Treue, S., “Basic neuroscience research with nonhuman primates: a small but indispensable component of biomedical research,” Neuron, 82, No. 6, 1200–1204 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider, J. S., Williams, C., Ault, M., and Guilarte, T. R., “Effects of chronic manganese exposure on attention and working memory in non-human primates,” Neurotoxicology, 217–222 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soto, P. L., Ator, N. A., Rallapalli, S. K., et al., “Allosteric modulation of GABA(A) receptor subtypes: effects on visual recognition and visuospatial working memory in rhesus monkeys [corrected],” Neuropsychopharmacology, 38, No. 11, 2315–2325 (2013a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soto, P. L., Dallery, J., Ator, N. A., and Katz, B. R., “A critical examination of best dose analysis for determining cognitive-enhancing potential of drugs: studies with rhesus monkeys and computer simulations,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 228, No. 4, 611–622 (2013b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taffe, M. A. and Taffe, W. J., “Rhesus monkeys employ a procedural strategy to reduce working memory load in a self-ordered spatial search task,” Brain Res., 1413, 43–50 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tereshchenko, L. V., Anisimov, V. T., Shul’govsky, V. V., and Latanov, A. V., “Early changes of saccade parameters in monkeys at the developments of MPTP-induced hemiparkinsonism,” Perception, 44, No. 8–9, 1054–1063 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tereshchenko, L. V., Molchanov, S. A., Kolesnikova, O. V., and Latanov, A. V., “Functional asymmetry of hand movements in monkeys (Macaca mulatta),” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 62, No. 4, 431–439 (2012).Google Scholar
  36. Tereshchenko, L. V., Yudin, A. G., Kuznetsov, Yu. B., et al., “Impairments to saccadic eye movements on development of MPTP-induced syndrome in monkeys,” Byull. Eksperim. Biol. Med., 133, No. 2, 215–218 (2002).Google Scholar
  37. Tsao, D. Y., Moeller, S., and Freiwald, W. A., “Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, No. 49, 19514–19519 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tulip, J., Zimmermann, J. B., Farningham, D., and Jackson, A., “An automated system for positive reinforcement training of group-housed macaque monkeys at breeding and research facilities,” J. Neurosci. Meth., 285, 6–18 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weed, M. R., Gold, L. H., Polis, I., et al., “Impaired performance on a rhesus monkey neuropsychological testing battery following simian immunodeficiency virus infection,” AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses, 20, No. 1, 77–89 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wichmann, T. and DeLong, M. R., “Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease: the MPTP primate model of the human disorder,” Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 991, 199–213 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, K. C., Corey, S., Westmoreland, S. V., et al., “Perivascular macrophages are the primary cell type productively infected by simian immunodeficiency virus in the brains of macaques: implications for the neuropathogenesis of AIDS,” J. Exp. Med., 193, No. 8, 905–915 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yan, T., Rizak, J. D., Yang, S., et al., “Acute morphine treatments alleviate tremor in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated monkeys,” PLoS One, 9, No. 2, e88404 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeamer, A., Clark, K., Bouquio, C., et al., “Impaired spatial working memory learning and performance in normal aged rhesus monkeys,” Behav. Brain Res., 232, No. 1, 287–293 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Higher Nervous Activity, Faculty of BiologyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations