Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 46, Issue 8, pp 855–862 | Cite as

Isometric Retraction and Invisible Nerve Cell Processes

  • O. S. Sotnikov
  • N. Yu. Vasyagina
  • T. V. Krasnova
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:

Many physiological studies in recent years on stress and hibernation have noted an unusual morphological phenomenon consisting of the rapid disappearance and restoration of the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and other parts of the brain. The present article seeks to explain this on the basis of morphological analysis of the natural elastic properties of the neuroplasm and the kinetics of partially preserved processed of living isolated neurons. Movement of neuroplasm in processes has been demonstrated with a bidirectional flow. A new physiological phenomenon is described – the isometric retraction of nerve cell processes, in which flows of neuroplasm are in opposite directions, leading to marked thinning of the middle parts and thickening of both ends. It is suggested that extreme thinning of processes can shrink them to submicroscopic dimensions, such that they become invisible under the light microscope. Repeated reversible “disappearance” and “reappearance” of processes has been demonstrated in neuron cultures and C-1300 neuroblastoma cells. Decreases in process diameter to the limits of visibility have been demonstrated using natural stretching of processes as an example. This same effect is seen in areas between reversible varicosities along processes. These areas become extremely thin and then invisible. By becoming thinner, the processes are able to become much longer. This review of the existing literature and our own data leads to the suggestion that the phenomenon of disappearing apical dendrites can be explained in terms of their isometric retraction, leading to the development of “invisible processes.”

Keywords

neurons nerve cell processes mechanical properties mechanism of thinning neuroplasm retraction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. V. Gulyaeva, “The effects of stress factors on hippocampal functioning in the adult body: molecular-cellular mechanisms and the dorsoventral gradient,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 99, No. 1, 3–16 (2013).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. F. Lesgaft, Basic Theoretical Anatomy, Tov. Khud. Pechati, St. Petersburg (1905).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. S. Sotnikov, Functional Morphology of Myelinated Nerve Fibers, Nauka, Leningrad (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. D. Al-Jahdari, S. Saito, T. Nakano, et al., “Propofol induces growth cone collapse and neurite retractions in chick explant culture,” Canad. J. Anaesthesia, 53, No. 11, 1078–1085 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Arendt, J. Stielder, A. M. Strykstra, et al., “Reversible paired helical filament-like phosphorylation of tau is an adaptive process associated with neuronal plasticity in hibernating animals,” J. Neurosci., 23, No. 18, 6972–6881 (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. W. Baas and F. J. Ahman, “Force generation by cytoskeletal motor proteins as a regulator of axonal elongation and retraction,” Trends Cell Biol., 11, No. 6, 244–249 (2001).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Billuart, C. G. Winter, A. Maresh, et al., “Regulating axon branch stability: the role of p190 RhoGAP in repressing a retraction signaling pathway,” Cell, 107, No. 2, 195–207 (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. B. Bloss, E. R. Puri, F. Yuk, et al., “Morphological and molecular changes in aging rat prelimbic prefrontal cortical synapses,” Neurobiol. Aging, 34, No. 1, 200–210 (2013).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Bray, “Mechanical tension produced by nerve cells in tissue culture,” J. Cell Sci., 37, 391–410 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Bray, “Axonal growth in response to experimentally applied mechanical tension,” Dev. Biol., 102, No. 2, 379–389 (1984).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. M. Brown, S. Henning, and C. L. Wellman, “Mild, short-term stress alters dendritic morphology in rat medial prefrontal cortex,” Cereb. Cortex, 15, No. 11, 1714–1722 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. S. Cook and C. L. Wellman, “Chronic stress alters dendritic morphology in rat medial prefrontal cortex,” J. Neurobiol., 60, No. 2, 236–248 (2004).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Eiland, J. Ramroop, M. N. Hill, et al., “Chronic juvenile stress produces corticolimbic dendritic architectural remodeling and modulates emotional behavior in male and female rats,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, No. 1, 39–47 (2012).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. A. Fenoglio, K. L. Brunson, and T. Z. Baram, “Hippocampal neuroplasticity induced by early-life stress: functional and molecular aspects,” Front. Neuroendocrinol., 27, No. 2, 180–192 (2006).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Fernandez-Moran, “The submicroscopic organization of vertebrate nerve fibers: an electron microscopic study of myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers,” Exp. Cell Res., 3, No. 2, 282–359 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Grutzendler, M. Kasthuri, and W. B. Gan, “Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex,” Nature, 4209, No. 6917, 812–816 (2002).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. H. Hill, C. J. Hillard, and B. S. McEwen, “Alterations in corticolimbic dendritic morphology and emotional behavior in cannabinoid CB1 receptor-deficient mice parallel the effects of chronic stress,” Cereb. Cortex, 21, No. 9, 2056–2064 (2011).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Kilinc, G. Gallo, and K. A. Barbee, “Mechanical membrane injury induces axonal beading through localized activation of calpain,” Exp. Neurol., 219, No. 2, 553–561 (2009).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. M. Margarinos, C. J. Li, J. Gal Toth, et al., “Effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor haploinsufficiency on stress-induced remodeling of hippocampal neurons,” Hippocampus, 21, No. 3, 253–264 (2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Malkinson and M. E. Spira, “Clustering of excess growth resources within leading growth cones underlies the recurrent ‘deposition’ of varicosities along developing neurites,” Exp. Neurol., 225, No. 1, 140–153 (2010).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Martinez-Tellez, M. J. Gómez-Villalobos, and G. Flores, “Alteration in dendritic morphology of cortical neurons in rats with diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin,” Brain Res., 1048, No. 1–2, 108–115 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. McCall, Z. M. Weil, J. Nacher, et al., “Depletion of polysialic acid from neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM) increases CA3 dendritic arborization and increases vulnerability to excitotoxicity,” Exp. Neurol., 241, 5–12 (2013).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. M. Miller, J. H. Morrison, and B. S. McEwen, “Basal anxiety-like behavior predicts differences in dendritic morphology in the medial prefrontal cortex in two strains of rats,” Behav. Brain Res., 229, No. 1, 280–288 (2012).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. V. Mudrakola and K. Zhang, “Optically resolving individual microtubules in live axons,” Structure, 17, No. 11, 1433–1441 (2009).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. A. Myers, I. Tint, C. V. Nadar, et al., “Antagonistic forces generated by cytoplasmic dynein and myosin-II during growth cone turning and axonal retraction,” Traffic, 7, No. 10, 1333–1351 (2006).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. A. Nimchinski, B. L. Sabatini, and K. Svoboda, “Structure and function of dendritic spines,” Annu. Rev. Physiol., 64, 313–353 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. I. Popov and L. S. Bocharova, “Hibernation-induced structural changes in synaptic contacts between mossy fibres and hippocampal pyramidal neurons,” Neuroscience, 48, No. 1, 53–62 (1992).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. J. Radley, A. B. Rocher, M. Miller, et al., “Repeated stress induces dendritic spine loss in the rat medial prefrontal cortex,” Cereb. Cortex, 16, No. 3, 313–320 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Ramon y Cajal, Degeneration, Regeneration of the Nervous System, Haften Publ. Co., New York (1959).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. M. Shansky, C. Hamo, P. R. Hof, et al., “Stress-induced dendritic remodeling in the prefrontal cortex is circuit specific,” Cereb. Cortex, 19, No. 10, 2479–2484 (2009).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    O. S. Sotnikov, “Use of cell culture to prove syncytial connection and fusion of neurons,” in: Biomedical Tissue Culture, INTECH, Rijeka (2012), Chap. 6, pp. 83–114.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O. S. Sotnikov, N. Yu. Vasyagina, and S. S. Sergeeva, “Traumatic retraction of living neural processes and its inhibition,” in: Axons: Cell Biology, Molecular Dynamics and Roles in Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Nova Biomedical, New York (2013), pp. 1–94.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    O. S. Sotnikov, N. Yu. Vasyagina, S. S. Sergeeva, et al., “Simultaneous axonal flows of opposite direction in neurites,” in: Biological Motility. New Facts and Hypotheses, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino (2014), pp. 289–292.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    D. N. Suter and K. E. Miller, “The emerging role of forces in axonal elongation,” Prog. Neurobiol., 94, No. 2, 91–101 (2011).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    C. A. Swetman, Y. Leverrier, R. Garg, et al., “Extension, retraction and contraction in the formation of a dendritic cell dendrite: distinct roles for Rho GTPases,” Eur. J. Immunol., 32, No. 7, 2074–2083 (2002).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D. Turina, V. M. Loitto, K. Björnström, et al., “Propofol causes neurite retraction in neurons,” Br. J. Anaesth., 101, No. 3, 374–379 (2008).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    C. G. Von der Ohe, C. D. Smith, C. C. Garner, et al., “Ubiquitous and temperature-dependent neural plasticity in hibernators,” J. Neurosci., 26, No. 41, 10590–10598 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. S. Sotnikov
    • 1
  • N. Yu. Vasyagina
    • 1
  • T. V. Krasnova
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for the Functional Morphology and Physiology of Neurons, Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations