Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 416–423 | Cite as

Induction of Amnesia Evoked by Impairment to Memory Reconsolidation by Glutamate or Serotonin Receptor Antagonists Is Suppressed by Protein Synthesis Inhibitors

  • V. P. NikitinEmail author
  • S. V. Solntseva

Common snails previously trained to an associative skill consisting of refusing a defined foodstuff were used to study the effects of the ionotropic AMPA-kainate glutamate receptor antagonist DNQX, the serotonin receptor antagonist methiothepin, and the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide on long-term memory reconsolidation processes. DNQX and cycloheximide given 24 h after training and before a reminder procedure were found to lead to impairment of the reproduction of the acquired skill, which was not restored by retraining two weeks after initial training. The skill impaired after methiothepin and the reminder recovered on retraining. However, simultaneous injections of DNQX and cycloheximide or methiothepin and cycloheximide before the reminder produced no impairment to the skill. It is suggested that irreversible and reversible types of amnesia induced by AMPA-kainate glutamate receptor antagonists and serotonin antagonists respectively require the synthesis of specific protein molecules.


learning memory reconsolidation amnesia neurotransmitter receptors protein synthesis inhibitors common snail 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. S. Abramova, V. L. Nistratova, A. A. Moskvitin, and A. S. Pivovarov, “Methiothepin-sensitive serotonin receptors are involved in the postsynaptic mechanism of sensitization of defensive reactions in the common snail,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “Serotonin and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists selectively impair reactivation of associative memory in the common snail,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 93, No. 10, 1101–1111 (2007).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “The reversible and irreversible stages of the development of amnesia after impairment of the reactivation of associative memory in snails,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 59, No. 3, 344–352 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “Protein synthesis is required for the induction of amnesia arising on impairment of the reconsolidation of long-term memory,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 96, No. 3, 247–258 (2010).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, A. V. Shevelkin, A.V. Lagutin, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Inhibition of protein synthesis during reactivation of an associative memory in the common snail induces transient or irreversible amnesia,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 92, No. 9, 1058–1068 (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Akirav and M. Maroun, “Ventromedial prefrontal cortex is obligatory for consolidation and reconsolidation of object recognition memory,” Cereb. Cortex, 16, No. 12, 1759–1765 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. M. Alberini, N. H. Milekic, and S. Tronel, “Mechanisms of memory stabilization and destabilization,” Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 63, No. 9, 999–1008 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. V. Anokhin, A. A. Tiunova, and S. P. R. Rose, “Reminder effects – reconsolidation or retrieval deficit? Pharmacological dissection with protein synthesis inhibitors following reminder for a passive-avoidance task in young chicks,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 15, No. 11, 1759–1765 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. M. Balaban, “Declarative and procedural memory in animals with simple nervous systems,” in: Psychology at the Turn of the Millennium, C. Hofsten (ed.), Akad. Press, Stockholm (2002), Vol. 1, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Citri and R. C. Malenka, “Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms,” Neuropsychopharmacology Rev., 1–24 (2007).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Cui, K. A. Lindl, B. Mei, S. Zhang, and J. Z. Tsien, “Requirement of NMDA receptor reactivation for consolidation and storage of nondeclarative taste revealed by inducible NR1 knockout,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 22, No. 3, 755–763 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory: a review,” Psychol. Bull., 96, No. 4, 518–559 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Diergaarde,A. N. Schoffelmeer, and T. J. De Vries, “Beta-adrenoceptor mediated inhibition of long-term reward-related memory reconsolidation,” Behav. Brain Res., 170, No. 2, 333–336 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Dudai, “The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram?” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 51–86 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Frey and J. U. Frey, “‘Synaptic tagging’ and ‘cross-tagging’ and related associative reinforcement processes of functional plasticity as the cellular basis for memory formation,” Progr. Brain Res., 169, 117–143 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. H. Gainutdinova, R. R. Tagirova, A. I. Ismailova, L. N. Muranova, E. I. Samarova, K. L. Gainutdinova, and P. M. Balaban, “Reconsolidation of a context long-term memory in the terrestrial snail requires protein synthesis,” Learn. Mem., 12, No. 6, 620–625 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. L. Lee and B. J. Everitt, “Appetitive memory reconsolidation depends upon NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 90, No. 1, 147–154 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Nader and S. H. Wang, “Fading in,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 530–553 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. E. Pedreira, L. M. Perez-Cuesta, and H. Maldonado, “Reactivation and reconsolidation of long-term memory in the crab Chasmagnathus: protein synthesis requirement and mediation by NMDA-type glutamatergic receptors,” J. Neurosci., 22, No. 18, 8305–8311 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. K. Rose and C. H. Rankin, “Blocking memory reconsolidation reverses memory-associated changes in glutamate receptor expression,” J. Neurosci., 26, No. 45, 11582–11587 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. J. Sara and B. Hars, “In memory of consolidation,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 515–521 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. M. Sherry and S. F. Crowe, “The non-NMDA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) impairs late reconsolidation of passive avoidance learning in the day-old chick,” Neurosci. Lett., 442, No. 3, 244–248 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. J. Summers, S. F. Crowe, and K. T. Ng, “Memory retrieval in the day-old chick: a psychobiological approach,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 27, No. 3, 219–231 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Suzuki, S. A. Josselyn, P. W. Frankland, S. Masushige, A. J. Silva, and S. Kida, “Memory reconsolidation and extinction have distinct temporal and biochemical signatures,” J. Neurosci., 24, No. 20, 4787–4795 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Torras-Garcia, J. Lelong, S. Tronel, and S. J. Sara, “Reconsolidation after remembering an odor-reward association requires NMDA receptors,” Learn. Mem., 12, No. 1, 18–22 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. C. Tronson and J. R. Taylor, “Molecular mechanisms of memory reconsolidation,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 8, No. 4, 262–275 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.-H. Wang and R. G. M. Morris, “Hippocampal-neocortical interactions in memory formation, consolidation, and reconsolidation,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 61, 49–79 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.P. K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology, Russian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations