Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 536–541 | Cite as

Current Approaches to Restoring Walking in Patients during the Acute Phase of Cerebral Stroke

  • V. I. Skvortsova
  • G. E. Ivanova
  • N. A. Rumyantseva
  • A. N. Staritsyn
  • E. A. KovrazhkinaEmail author
  • A. Yu. Suvorov

The aim of this study was to create a complex program for restoring walking in stroke patients using motor-assisted walking trainers. The study included patients (mean age 59 ± 10.4 years) in the acute phase of stroke who were unable to walk independently; 53 patients were in the study group and 25 in the control group. The mean time from onset to treatment using motor-assisted trainers was 14 ± 1.6 days and was defined on the basis of adequate test results. The rehabilitation program included daily 30-min sessions of physical therapy. Patients of the study group but not controls also received 20-min sessions using Motomed Viva 2 and Gait Trainer 1 (GT1) motor-assisted trainers accompanied by continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Patients received 5–12 (mean 7 ± 1) sessions on the GT1. After complex rehabilitation treatment, patients of the study group, as compared with controls, showed significant (p < 0.01) improvements in dynamics on the standing stability, walking functionality, and the Berg and Bartel scales; all patients of this group became able to walk with a support or completely independently. In the study group there were significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the proportions of patients with impaired proprioception (from 37.7% to 9.4%) and lower limb ataxia (from 37% to 11.3%); no such changes occurred in the control group. These results lead to the conclusion that the complex use of reflex kinesiotherapy and robot-driven mechanotherapy in patients during the acute phase of stroke produces improvements in functional activity and increases the level of independence by discharge from hospital.

Key words

cerebral stroke mechanotherapy motor-assisted trainers complex walking restoration program 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. N. Belova, Neurorehabilitation: Handbook for Doctors [in Russian], Moscow (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Belyaev, Spasticity [in Russian], Moscow (2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. P. Warlow, M. S. Dennis, J. Van Gijn, et al., Stroke: A Practical Guide to Management [Russian translation], Politekhnika, St. Petersburg (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. I. Gusev, V. I. Skvortsova, and V. V. Krylov, “Decreases in mortality from vascular brain diseases in the Russian Federation,” in: Proc. 80th Session of the General Meeting of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences [in Russian] (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. I. Gusev,V. I. Skvortsova, and L. V. Stakhovskaya, “Epidemiology of stroke in Russia,” Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiat., Stroke (suppl.), No. 8, 4–9 (2003).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. I. Dovgan and I. B. Temkin, Mechanotherapy [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. E. Ivanova, “Rehabilitation treatment of stroke patients,” Ros. Med. Zh., 1, 48–50 (2002).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. A. Polyaev, O. A. Laisheva, and S. A. Parastaev, “Current concepts of the possible mechanisms of correcting functional impairments to the motor system,” Vestn. RGMU, 1, 38–41 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. V. Chogovadze, V. I. Skvortsova, and G. E. Ivanova, “A system for the early rehabilitation of stroke patients,” Vestn. RGMU, 1, No. 6, 42–46 (1999).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (1991), pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Doman, What to Do about Your Brain-Injured Child, Juridiskais Birojs VINDEX, SIA (2007).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Hesse, C. Bertelt, M. T. Janke, et al., “Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients,” Stroke, 26, 976–981 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Hesse, “Recovery of gait and other motor functions after stroke: novel physical and pharmacological treatment strategies,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 22, No. 3–5, 359–369 (2004).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Hesse, H. Schmidt, and C. Werner, “Machines to support motor rehabilitation after stroke: 10 years of experience in Berlin,” J. Rehab. Res. Dev., 43, No. 5, 671–678 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Hilder, D. Nichols, M. Pellicio, et al., “Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the LOKOMAT in subacute stroke,” Neurorehab. Neural Rep., 23, No. 1, 5–13 (2009).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. C. Kosak and M. J. Reding, “Comparison of partial body-weightsupported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing assisted walking post stroke,” Neurorehab. Neural Rep., 14, No. 1, 13–19 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Peurala et al., “Gait characteristics after gait – oriented rehabilitation in chronic stroke,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 23, No. 2, 57–65 (2005).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. K. Tong, M. F. Ng, and L. S. Li, “Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 87, No. 10, 1298–1304 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. I. Skvortsova
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. E. Ivanova
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. A. Rumyantseva
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. N. Staritsyn
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. A. Kovrazhkina
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Yu. Suvorov
    • 1
  1. 1.Russian State Medical UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Research Institute of Cerebrovascular PathologyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations