Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 793–799 | Cite as

Gender-Related Differences in Changes in the Coherence of Cortical Biopotentials during Image-Based Creative Thought: Relationship with Action Efficacy


The aim of the present work was to study the characteristics of cortical interactions during performance of an image-based creative task in men and women with high and low levels of creativity. Subjects were divided into groups on the basis of the median originality score. EEG recordings were made in baseline conditions and during performance of the task (the Torrance Tests of Creating Thinking, “Incomplete Figures”). EEG coherence was calculated in six frequency ranges, from theta1 to beta2. Total coherence was analyzed for each of 16 leads calculated separately for intrahemisphere and interhemisphere coherence links. Differences in changes in coherence evoked by performing the task between subjects with high and low levels of originality were seen at the theta2, alpha1, and alpha2 frequencies. These differences resulted from decreases in coherence at low levels of originality, accompanied by increases in coherence in the theta1 and alpha 2 ranges and, at high levels of originality, a less significant decrease in the alpha2 range. The alpha2 range also showed an interaction between the gender, creativity, laterality, and electrode position factors on analysis of task performance-linked intrahemisphere coherence of cortical biopotentials. The patterns of the spatial distributions of coherence across the hemispheres were found to be similar in men and women with opposite levels of creativity, while task-linked changes in coherence in the anterior areas of the left and posterior areas of the right hemisphere were larger in high-creativity men as compared with those with low creativity. The results are evaluated in relation to the possibility that men and women use different cognitive strategies to achieve identical results from creative activity.

Key words

EEG coherence levels of creativity gender-related differences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. N. Bekhtereva, S. G. Danko, M. G. Starchenko, S. V. Pakhomov, and S. V. Medvedev, “Studies of the cerebral organization of creativity. III. Brain activation assessed by analysis of local brain blood flow and the EEG,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 27, No. 4, 6–14 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. P. Bekhtereva and Zh. V. Nagornova, “Dynamics of EEG coherence during performance of tasks involving nonverbal (figural) creativity,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 33, No. 5, 5–13 (2007).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. V. Volf, O. M. Razumnikova, and M. A. Onishchenko, “Relationship between hemisphere selection of information in a modified Stroop test and the effectiveness of creative activity,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 57, No. 4, 448–454 (2007).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. G. Danko, M. G. Starchenko, and N. P. Bekhterev, “Local and spatial EEG synchronization during performance of a test for the insight strategy for solving creative verbal tasks,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 29, No. 4, 129–132 (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. M. Razumnikov, “Functional significance of biopotentials in the α-2 range in convergent and divergent verbal thought,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 33, No. 2, 23–34 (2007).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. E. Siderskaya, T. N. Dashchinskaya, and G. V. Taratynova, “Spatial organization of the EEG in active creative processes,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 51, No. 3, 393–401 (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. E. Sviderskaya, G. V. Taratynova, and R. G. Kozhedub, “Influence of the skill consisting of forming visual images on the spatial organization of the EEG,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 55, No. 6, 812–821 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. V. Tarasova, N. V. Volf, and O. M. Razumnikova, “Changes in EEG coherence on performance of a figural creative task in men and women,” Byull. Sib. Otdel Ros. Akad. Med. Nauk., 1, 117–122 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. V. Ushakov, “Current studies in creativity,” Psychology: Zh. Vyssh. Shk. Ekonomiki, 2, No. 4, 53–56 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. A. Berfield, W. J. Ray, and N. Newcombe, “Sex role and spatial ability: An EEG study,” Neuropsychology, 24, 731–735 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. M. Clements, S. L. Rimrodt, J. R. Abel, J. G. Blankner, S. H. Mostofsky, J. J. Pekar, M. B. Denckla, and L. E. Cutting, “Sex differences in cerebral laterality of language and visuospatial processing,” Brain Lang., 98, 150–158 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Dietrich, “The cognitive neuroscience of creativity,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 11, 1011–1026 (2004).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. I. Elfgren and J. Risberg, “Lateralized frontal blood flow increases during fluency tasks: influence of cognitive strategy,” Neuropsychology, 36, 505–512 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. J. Farah, “The neural basis of mental imagery,” Trends Neurosci., 12, 395–399 (1989).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Fink and A. C. Neubauer, “EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 62, 46–53 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. J. Haier, R. E. Jung, R. A. Yeo, K. Head, and M. T. Alkire, “The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters,” Neuroimage, 25, 320–327 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. M. Heilman, S. E. Nadeau, and D. O. Beversdorf, “Creative innovation: possible brain mechanisms,” Neurocase, 9, 369–379 (2003).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Jausovec and K. Jausovec, “EEG activity during the performance of complex mental problems,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 36, 73–88 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Jung-Beeman and E. M. Bowden, “The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems,” Mem. Cognit., 28, 1231–1241 (2000).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Martindale, “Biological bases of creativity,” in: Handbook of Creativity, R. Sternberg (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999), pp. 137–152.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Mohr, C. M. Michel, G. Lantz, S. Ortigue, I. Viaud-Delmon, and T. Landis, “Brain state-dependent functional hemispheric specialization in men but not in women,” Cer. Cortex, 15, 1451–1458 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Petsche, S. Kaplan, A. von Stein, and O. Filz, “The possible meaning of the upper and lower α frequency ranges for cognitive and creative tasks,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 26, 77–97 (1997).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. D. Ragland, A. R. Coleman, R. C. Gur, D. C. Glahn, and R. E. Gur, “Sex differences in brain-behavior relationships between verbal episodic memory and resting regional cerebral blood flow,” Neuropsychologia, 38, 451–461 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O. M. Razumnikova, “Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: an EEG investigation in human subjects,” Neurosci. Lett., 362, 193–195 (2004).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. E. Roberts and M. A. Bell, “Sex differences on a mental rotation task: variation in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students,” Dev. Neuropsychol., 17, 199–223 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Thomsen, K. Hugdahl, L. Ersland, R. Barndon, A. Lundervold, A. I. Smievoll, B. E. Roscher, and H. Sundberg, “Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task,” Med. Sci. Monit., 6, 1186–1196 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Vannini, O. Almkvist, A. Franck, T. Jonsson, U. Volpe, M. Kristofferson Wiberg, L. O. Wahlund, and T. Dierks, “Task demand modulations of visuospatial processing measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging,” Neuroimage, 21, 58–68 (2004).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. V. Volf and O. M. Razumnikova, “Sex differences in EEG coherence during a verbal memory task in normal adults,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 34, 113–122 (1999).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. V. Volf, O. M. Razumnikova, and I. V. Tarasova, “EEG-mapping study of sex differences during verbal creative thinking,” in: Focus on Brain Research,” C. J. Resch (ed.), Nova Sci. Publ., New York (2007), pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. von Stein and J. Sarnthein, “Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 38, 301–313 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. V. Volf
    • 1
  • I. V. Tarasova
    • 1
  • O. M. Razumnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.State Research Institute of Physiology, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of Medical SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations