Advertisement

Effects of Wormhole Configurations on Performance of Cyclic Solvent Injection in Heavy Oil Systems

  • Nathan Abraham David
  • Farshid TorabiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the effect of three different wormhole configurations: single-linear, single-branched, and double-branched wormholes on the performance of cyclic solvent injection was investigated through extensive experimentation. A 2D rectangular sand-packed model with porosity and permeability of 31.96–33.2% and 4.3–10.4 d and heavy oil sample of viscosity 4440 mPa.s at T = 21 °C were used to represent a typical thin post-cold heavy oil production, respectively, with sands (post-CHOPS) reservoir. First, a series of cyclic solvent (15% C3H8–85% CO2) injection tests were carried out under operating injection pressure of Pinj = 730 kPa. After termination of each test, the residual oil saturation distributions on the top and middle layers of the sand-packed model were determined through additional tests. Thereafter, the double-branched wormhole network was subjected to another cyclic injection of 15% C3H8–85% CO2 to investigate the effect of a lengthier soaking time. The experimental results showed an improved heavy oil recovery factor (RF) (attributed to foamy oil phenomenon) as the number of wormhole branch increases. Therefore, better performance of CSI process was ascribed to larger wormhole coverage in the sand-packed model. The residual oil saturation profile also confirms this as larger wormhole coverage is required to produce oil during CSI process. However, lengthier soaking time in the presence of double-branched wormhole improved the incremental production of the early cycles, and increased the ultimate oil RF from 43.46 to 47.06% original oil in place. The findings of this paper further iterate the role of wormhole multi-branching systems in post-CHOPS reservoirs on the application of CSI schemes as a follow-up technique.

Keywords

CSI Foamy oil Heavy oil Multi-branched wormhole Residual oil saturation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The “Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research (FGSR) of University of Regina” and also “Petroleum Technology Research Center (PTRC)” are acknowledged for providing financial support to carry out this study.

References

  1. Ahadi, A., & Torabi, F. (2018a). Effect of light hydrocarbon solvents on the performance of CO2-based cyclic solvent injection (CSI) in heavy oil systems. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 163, 526–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahadi, A., & Torabi, F. (2018b). Insight into heavy oil recovery of cyclic solvent injection (CSI) utilizing C3H8/CH4 and C3H8/CH4/CO2. Petroleum, 4(3), 337–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmodloo, F., Asghari, K., Henni, A., & Freitag, N. P. (2011). Experimental results and analytical modeling of solvent leaching gravity drainage phenomenon in heavy oil reservoirs. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, R. M., & Jiang, Q. (2000). Improved recovery of heavy oil by Vapex with widely spaced horizontal injectors and producers. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(1), 48–56.  https://doi.org/10.2118/00-01-04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, J., & Ivory, J. (2013). Field-scale simulation of cyclic solvent injection (CSI). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 52(4), 251–265.  https://doi.org/10.2118/157804-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, S., Lines, L., & Daley, P. F. (2004). Do wormholes play a role in heavy oil cold production ? In 2004 CSEG National Convention.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1851142.
  7. Du, Z., Peng, X., & Zeng, F. (2018a). Experimental investigation of cyclic solvent injection based on mixture solvent of carbon dioxide and propane. Fuel, 225, 646–654.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du, Z., Zeng, F., & Chan, C. (2015). An experimental study of the post-CHOPS cyclic solvent injection process. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 137(4), 042901.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Du, Z., Zeng, F., Peng, X., & Chan, C. (2018b). Experimental and material balance equations analyses of cyclic solvent injection based on a large 3D physical model. Fuel, 215, 915–927.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ivory, J., Chang, J., Coates, R., & Forshner, K. (2010). Investigation of cyclic solvent injection process for heavy oil recovery. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 49(9), 22–33.  https://doi.org/10.2118/140662-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia, X., Zeng, F., & Gu, Y. (2015). Gasflooding-assisted cyclic solvent injection (GA-CSI) for enhancing heavy oil recovery. Fuel.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang, T., Zeng, F., Jia, X., & Gu, Y. (2014). A new solvent-based enhanced heavy oil recovery method: Cyclic production with continuous solvent injection. Fuel, 115(January), 426–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knorr, K. D., & Imran, M. (2012). Solvent-chamber development in 3D-physical-model experiments of solvent—Vapour extraction (SVX) processes with various permeabilities and solvent-vapour qualities. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology.  https://doi.org/10.2118/149190-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ma, H., Huang, D., Yu, G., She, Y., & Gu, Y. (2017). Combined cyclic solvent injection and waterflooding in the post-cold heavy oil production with sand reservoirs. Energy and Fuels.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayo, L. (1996). Seismic monitoring of foamy heavy oil, Lloydminster, Western Canada. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1996 (pp. 2091–2094).Google Scholar
  16. Mohammadpoor, M., Saskatchewan, R., & Volodin, A. (2014). Experimental, Numerical, and Soft Computing-Based Analysis of the Vapex Process in Heavy Oil Systems. Regina: University of Regina Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research Supervisory and Examining Committee.Google Scholar
  17. Mohammadpoor, M., & Torabi, F. (2015). Extensive experimental investigation of the effect of drainage height and solvent type on the stabilized drainage rate in vapour extraction (VAPEX) process. Petroleum, 1(3), 187–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2015.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Qazvini Firouz, A., & Torabi, F. (2012). Feasibility Study of Solvent-Based Huff-n-Puff Method (Cyclic Solvent Injection) To Enhance Heavy Oil Recovery. In SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada.  https://doi.org/10.2118/157853-MS.
  19. Rangriz Shokri, A., & Babadagli, T. (2014). Modelling of cold heavy-oil production with sand for subsequent thermal/solvent injection applications. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 53(2), 95–108.  https://doi.org/10.2118/158934-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rangriz Shokri, A., & Babadagli, T. (2015). Field-scale deformation analysis of cyclic solvent stimulation in thin unconsolidated heavy-oil reservoirs with developed wormhole network. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 54(06), 341–350.  https://doi.org/10.2118/165534-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rangriz Shokri, A., & Babadagli, T. (2016). Laboratory measurements and numerical simulation of cyclic solvent stimulation with a thermally aided solvent retrieval phase in the presence of wormholes after cold heavy oil production with sand. Energy & Fuels, 30(11), 9181–9192.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sawatzky, R. P., Lillico, D. A., London, M. J., Tremblay, B. R., & Coates, R. M. (2002). Tracking Cold Production Footprints. In Canadian International Petroleum Conference, June 11–13.  https://doi.org/10.2118/2002-086.
  23. Soh, Y., Rangriz-Shokri, A., & Babadagli, T. (2018). Optimization of methane use in cyclic solvent injection for heavy-oil recovery after primary production through experimental and numerical studies. Fuel, 214(November 2017), 457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Squires, A. (1993). Inter-well tracer results and gel blocking program. In Tenth Annual Heavy oil Sands technical Symposium. Calgary.Google Scholar
  25. Tremblay, B., Sedgwick, G., & Forshner, K. (1996). Imaging of sand production in a horizontal sand pack by X-ray computed tomography. SPE Formation Evaluation, 11(02), 94–98.  https://doi.org/10.2118/30248-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tremblay, B., Sedgwick, G., & Forshner, K. (1997). Simulation of cold production in heavy-oil reservoirs: Wormhole dynamics. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12(02), 110–117.  https://doi.org/10.2118/35387-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tremblay, B., Sedgwick, G., & Vu, D. (1999). CT imaging of wormhole growth under solution-gas drive. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2(01), 37–45.  https://doi.org/10.2118/54658-PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiao, L., & Zhao, G. (2017). Estimation of CHOPS wormhole coverage from rate/time flow behaviors. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 20(4), 957–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yadali Jamaloei, B., Dong, M., Mahinpey, N., & Maini, B. B. (2012). Enhanced cyclic solvent process (ECSP) for heavy oil and bitumen recovery in thin reservoirs. Energy & Fuels, 26(5), 2865–2874.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300152b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeung, K. C. (1995). Cold flow production of crude bitumen at the burnt lake project. In UNITAR international conference on heavy crude and tar sands on fueling for a clean and safe environment. Houston.Google Scholar
  31. Yuan, J.-Y., Bernard, T., & Babchin, A. (1999). A wormhole network model of cold production in heavy oil. Society Of Petroleum Engineers.  https://doi.org/10.2523/54097-MS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeng, F., Knorr, K. D., & Wilton, R. (2008). Post-cold production solvent vapor extraction (SVX) Process performance evaluation by numerical simulation. In Canadian International Petroleum Conference.Google Scholar
  33. Zhang, M., Du, Z., Zeng, F., Hong, S. Y., & Xu, S. (2016). Upscaling study of the cyclic solvent injection process for post-chops reservoirs through numerical simulation. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 94(7), 1402–1412.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao, D. W., Wang, J. ( Jacky), & Gates, I. D. (2015). An evaluation of enhanced oil reovery strategies for a heavy oil reservoir after cold production with sand. International Journal of Energy Research, 39(10), 1355–1365.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Petroleum Systems EngineeringUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations