Natural Resources Research

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 83–93 | Cite as

Tee-SVX: Enhanced Oil Flow Rate in Solvent Vapor Extraction Process

Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

The production rate in classical vapor extraction (VAPEX) is far too low for the process to be considered commercially viable. This is largely because the classical process utilizes forces of buoyancy and mass transfer by diffusion and dispersion to distribute the solvent and gravity to drain the diluted oil to the producer. This article presents a new well pattern Tee-SVX which may enhance the oil-flow rate by two to ten times over that of the classical approach. In the new well pattern, additional horizontal injectors, perpendicular to the injector and the producer in Classical VAPEX, are placed in the topmost region of a reservoir. The oil-rate-enhancement mechanism for this new well pattern involves two features. First, the operation pressure of the top injectors is set slightly higher than the bottom injector pressure. This facilitates a downward driving force to assist gravity drainage of diluted oil to the producer. Second, the supplementary injectors generate an additional diluted oil profile perpendicular to the diluted oil profile of the Classical VAPEX process. Therefore, in the new well pattern, the heavy oil is solvent contacted and diluted in both vertical planes (one plane perpendicular to and the other parallel to the horizontal producer), whereas in Classical VAPEX, the heavy oil is diluted in only one. A series of numerical simulations were conducted to evaluate this process. In order to obtain reliable evaluation results, the numerical dispersion was eliminated through extrapolating the simulation results at different grid sizes to an infinitesimal grid size (Δy → 0). The simulation results suggest that the oil-flow rate can be enhanced two to ten times greater than that with Classical VAPEX, depending on the well spacing of the top injectors. For example, for a well spacing of the top horizontal injectors of 120 m, the oil-flow rate from the original producers will be 5.5 times higher than that of Classical VAPEX. For thinner reservoirs, the Tee-SVX can enhance the oil-production rate higher compared with Classical VAPEX. For reservoirs with a small gas cap, Lateral-SVX with vertical injector is quite effective.

Keywords

Solvent injection heavy oil horizontal wells VAPEX enhanced oil rate 

Nomenclature

Tvapex

Time required to produce the amount of oil for Classical VAPEX process (days)

TTee-SVX

Time required to produce the amount of oil for Tee-SVX process (days)

Rov

Enhanced oil rate ratio

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the financial and in-kind support from the Petroleum Technology Research Center (PTRC), Technology Early Action Measures (TEAM) project, the Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), and Nexen Inc.

References

  1. Baytex Energy Ltd. (2005). Vapor extraction. Field Project Technical Report, Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, Regina, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, R. M., & Jiang, Q. (2000). Improved recovery of heavy oil by VAPEX with widely spaced horizontal injectors and producers. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(1), 48–56.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, R. M., & Mokrys, I. (1998). Closed-loop extraction method for the recovery of heavy oils and bitumens underlain by aquifers: The VAPEX process. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 37(4), 41–50.Google Scholar
  4. Cuthiell, D., McCarthy, C., Frauenfeld, T., Cameron, S., & Kissel, G. (2003). Investigation of the VAPEX process using CT scanning and numerical simulation. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 42(2), 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuthiell, D., McCarthy, C., Kissel, G., & Cameron, S. (2006). The role of capillarity in VAPEX. Presented at the Petroleum Society’s 7th Canadian international petroleum conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 13–15, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Frauenfeld, F., Jossy, C., Rispler, K., & Kissel, G. (2006). Evaluation of the bottom water reservoir VAPEX process. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 45(9), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haajizadeh, M., et al. (1999). On the importance of dispersion and heterogeneity in the compositional simulation of miscible gas processes; SPE 57264. Presented at the 1999 Asia pacific improved oil recovery conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 25–26, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Rahnema, H., Ghaderi, S. M., & Farahani, S. (2007). Simulation of VAPEX process in problematic reservoirs: A promising tool along with experimental study. Presented at the 2007 SPE/EAGE reservoir characterization and simulation conference held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, October 28–31, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Rezaei, N., & Chatzis, I. (2007). Incorporation of heat in the VAPEX process: Warm VAPEX. Presented at the Petroleum Society’s 8th Canadian international petroleum conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 12–14, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Stalder, J. L. (2007). Cross SAGD (XSAGD)—An accelerated bitumen recovery alternative. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 10(1), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stalkup, F. I. (1990). Effect of gas enrichment and numerical dispersion on enriched-gas-drive predictions. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 5(6), 647–655.Google Scholar
  12. Wu, X., Polikar, M., & Cunha, L. B. (2005). A numerical approach to simulate and design VAPEX experiments. Paper 2005-180 presented the 2005 Canadian international petroleum conference, June 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Petroleum Systems EngineeringFaculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC)ReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations